Summary
Understanding why DKIM passes in Gmail but fails in Hotmail (Outlook.com) is crucial for maintaining good email deliverability. This discrepancy often points to specific sensitivities or unique handling mechanisms by Microsoft's email systems compared to Google's. While Gmail is generally robust in validating email authentication, Outlook.com and Hotmail can be more stringent or interpret DKIM signatures differently, leading to 'signature did not verify' errors even when your setup appears correct. This summary explores the technical nuances and common pitfalls that cause this specific DKIM authentication challenge.
Key findings
- Microsoft's strictness: Microsoft (Outlook.com/Hotmail) can be more sensitive or have different interpretations of DKIM signatures, leading to failures that don't occur with other providers like Gmail. This is a common pain point for senders.
- Content modification: Historical issues suggest Microsoft might modify email content, for example by converting certain characters or tabs to spaces, which invalidates the DKIM signature during verification.
- Interoperability issues: There can be interoperability problems between specific DKIM signing implementations, such as OpenDKIM, and Microsoft's verification systems. Sometimes, a signature that fails with one validator passes with another.
- DNS resolution: Problems with Microsoft's ability to resolve your DKIM DNS record, possibly due to caching or specific DNS server issues, can cause verification failures.
- Signature integrity: A DKIM body hash did not verify error (or signature did not verify) means the received message content or headers do not match the DKIM signature that was applied at the sending end.
Key considerations
- Sender reputation: While a DKIM failure can impact deliverability, Microsoft may not automatically send an email to spam based on DKIM alone if other authentication or reputation signals are strong.
- Testing with simple content: When troubleshooting, send a very basic, plain-text email to isolate if content-related issues are causing the DKIM signature to break.
- Monitoring DMARC reports: Analyze your DMARC reports, especially those from Outlook.com, to identify specific DKIM failure reasons, such as 'temperror' or 'signature verification failed'.
- Reviewing sender guidelines: Always refer to the latest sender requirements for Microsoft as their authentication policies can evolve.
- DKIM key and canonicalization: Ensure your DKIM record uses appropriate key length and canonicalization methods (e.g., relaxed/relaxed) as strict methods are more prone to breaking due to minor modifications.
What email marketers say
Email marketers frequently encounter the frustrating scenario of DKIM authentication passing perfectly in one email client, like Gmail, but failing when the same email is sent to another, such as Hotmail or Outlook. This inconsistency can lead to deliverability issues and impact campaign performance. Marketers often suspect that Microsoft's systems might be more finicky or perform unique processing that inadvertently breaks the DKIM signature, even when the setup appears technically sound. Many share experiences of this specific challenge without always finding a clear, universal solution.
Key opinions
- Widespread issue: Many marketers report experiencing DKIM failures with Microsoft services, indicating it's a common problem without a single, easy fix.
- Microsoft's unique handling: There's a strong perception that Microsoft invalidates DKIM signatures due to their specific internal processing or stricter validation rules.
- Transactional email impact: Marketers are particularly concerned when critical transactional emails, like flight information, are impacted and land in spam due to these authentication failures.
- Wildcard record concern: Some suggest that the presence of certain DNS records, like wildcard DKIM entries, might contribute to authentication issues, even if not directly causing the Microsoft-specific problem.
- Platform specific variations: Senders note differences in DKIM behavior depending on the sending platform or method (e.g., PowerShell vs. Outlook client).
Key considerations
- No easy fix: Marketers often express frustration due to the lack of clear explanations or immediate solutions for these persistent DKIM discrepancies between providers.
- Impact on DMARC: While SPF might pass, a failing DKIM means DMARC may not pass, particularly if DMARC alignment relies on DKIM, which can then lead to mail being blocked or sent to junk, emphasizing the importance of understanding DMARC authentication.
- Collaboration: Engaging with email deliverability communities can provide insights into shared experiences and potential workarounds, even if definitive solutions are scarce.
- Holistic deliverability view: A DKIM failure with one provider doesn't necessarily mean all emails will go to spam, as inbox placement is influenced by multiple factors, including SPF, DMARC, content, and sender reputation. Other checks may apply.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes that this issue is not isolated and many others face similar DKIM failures with no clear solution yet.
Marketer view
A user on PrestaShop Forums encountered DKIM failure when sending via PowerShell, but not Outlook, suggesting platform-specific signing variations.
What the experts say
Industry experts concur that the DKIM validation disparities between Gmail and Hotmail are a known challenge, often stemming from Microsoft's specific and sometimes unpredictable handling of email content and DNS queries. Experts highlight that while a DKIM failure is a concern, Microsoft's anti-spam systems consider multiple factors beyond just DKIM when determining inbox placement. They suggest that the root cause might be interoperability issues between common DKIM signing software and Microsoft's verification processes, or even subtle content modifications that invalidate the signature.
Key opinions
- Microsoft's DKIM handling: Experts commonly point to Microsoft's (Outlook.com) DKIM handling as the primary reason for these failures, suggesting their verification process might be more idiosyncratic or strict.
- Interoperability issues: The problem may be an interoperability issue where DKIM signatures generated by tools like OpenDKIM are not consistently verified by Microsoft's systems, even if valid elsewhere.
- Content modification: A significant theory is that Microsoft's systems might be making subtle modifications to email content (e.g., character encoding, tab-to-space conversions), which then causes the DKIM signature hash to mismatch.
- DNS query issues: Microsoft's inability to properly query one or more of your DNS servers for the DKIM record can lead to authentication failures.
- Not sole spam factor: Experts generally agree that a single DKIM failure by Microsoft is unlikely to be the sole reason an email goes to spam, as other factors like SPF, DMARC alignment, and sender reputation also play a role.
Key considerations
- System-level vs. sender-level: When DKIM passes in Gmail but fails in Outlook, it often points to a problem with the receiving end's (Microsoft's) DKIM handling or an interoperability issue, rather than a misconfiguration on the sender's part.
- Troubleshooting methodology: To diagnose content issues, send minimalist emails to Microsoft recipients and gradually add content elements to pinpoint the breaking factor. This is key when fixing DKIM body hash mismatch failures.
- DNS verification: Manually confirm that your DKIM record is externally queryable from all your DNS servers to rule out DNS resolution problems for various receiving IPs.
- Algorithm and key choice: While RSA-SHA256 is standard, ensuring full compatibility might involve reviewing specific OpenDKIM versions or canonicalization settings if issues persist, as some systems might be more forgiving.
- DMARC reports provide insight: Experts recommend using DMARC reports to diagnose the exact reasons for DKIM failures reported by Hotmail, which often show temperror statuses when Microsoft has trouble performing DNS lookups.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests that the problem might lie with Microsoft's DKIM handling rather than the sender's configuration, noting that Microsoft's signatures often fail verification by OpenDKIM.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from Spamresource.com advises that email senders regularly audit their DKIM records for proper syntax and publication to prevent authentication issues.
What the documentation says
Technical documentation and research on email authentication protocols like DKIM highlight that different email providers implement and enforce these standards with varying degrees of strictness and unique interpretations. While the core DKIM specification is uniform, how mail servers process, reformat, or validate incoming emails can differ, leading to situations where a signature passes verification at one domain but fails at another. This is especially true for large providers like Microsoft, which may implement additional security layers or content scanning that inadvertently alter the signed email content, thus breaking the DKIM signature.
Key findings
- Signature verification process: DKIM failure fundamentally means the digital signature on an email could not be verified by the recipient's server, indicating the message content or headers may have been altered after signing.
- Body hash did not verify: A common cause of DKIM failure is a mismatch in the body hash, which occurs if the email body is modified even subtly during transit or by the receiving mail server before verification.
- Identifier alignment: DKIM failures can result from issues with identifier alignment, where the domain in the DKIM signature does not align with the RFC5322.From domain, which is crucial for DMARC enforcement.
- DNS lookup issues: A DKIM 'temperror' in DMARC reports from services like Outlook.com often means the receiving server had a temporary issue performing a DNS lookup for the DKIM public key.
- Provider-specific checks: Some major email providers, including Microsoft, may apply additional, proprietary checks or interpret existing standards more strictly, potentially leading to DKIM breaking, as noted by industry resources.
Key considerations
- Canonicalization choice: The choice of DKIM canonicalization algorithm (relaxed vs. simple) impacts how sensitive the signature is to message modifications. 'Relaxed' is generally more resilient to common reformatting by mail servers.
- Header and body integrity: Ensuring that no unintended modifications occur to the email headers or body after DKIM signing is critical for successful verification.
- Regular record validation: Periodically validating your DKIM DNS record and ensuring it's accessible globally can prevent failures due to DNS propagation or caching issues.
- DMARC impact: A DKIM failure, especially if the DMARC policy is set to quarantine or reject and SPF also fails alignment, can significantly impact deliverability. DMARC provides a framework for handling such failures.
Technical article
Mailgun's blog indicates that Microsoft may apply additional checks before delivery or interpret alignment more strictly, potentially leading to DKIM breaking.
Technical article
AutoSPF explains that DKIM failure occurs when the email's digital signature fails verification on the recipient's server, often due to identifier alignment issues or record setup problems.
Related resources
10 resources
.png.cfa0d94e3dd662c62583f1674220e6b9.png)
Related pages
Why does DKIM fail for Outlook.com and Hotmail.com?
How to fix DKIM body hash did not verify errors on Outlook.com and prevent emails from going to spam?
Why is Microsoft DKIM failing when Gmail passes, and how to fix it?
Why are Microsoft Office 365 DKIM signatures failing and how to fix it?
Decoding DKIM temperror: what it is and how to fix it
Diagnosing and reducing DKIM temporary error rates with Microsoft
How to fix DKIM body hash mismatch failures
How To Comply With Outlook's New Sender Requirements
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
