Suped

Why does my newsletter land in Outlook/Hotmail spam and what can I do about it?

Matthew Whittaker profile picture
Matthew Whittaker
Co-founder & CTO, Suped
Published 16 Jul 2025
Updated 15 Aug 2025
8 min read
It can be incredibly frustrating when your carefully crafted newsletter, intended for eager subscribers, consistently lands in the junk or spam folders of Outlook and Hotmail. This is a common challenge for email senders, especially for newer domains or those managing significant subscriber lists. While it might feel like an uphill battle, there are definitive steps you can take to diagnose and resolve these deliverability issues.
One of the immediate concerns often raised is the age of a domain. While a brand new domain can experience some initial scrutiny, a couple of months should typically be enough to establish a basic level of trust if best practices are followed. However, if your confirmation emails or regular newsletters are consistently missing the inbox for Microsoft users, it points to deeper underlying problems beyond just domain age.
This guide will walk you through the primary reasons your newsletter might be getting caught in Microsoft's spam filters and provide actionable strategies to improve your inbox placement. We'll cover everything from technical configurations to content best practices, ensuring your messages reach their intended audience.

Understanding Outlook and Hotmail's filtering

Microsoft's spam filtering systems for Outlook and Hotmail are known for their strictness and can be less transparent than those of other major providers. They rely heavily on sophisticated machine learning algorithms that constantly analyze incoming mail for potential threats and unwanted content. This means even legitimate newsletters can inadvertently trigger filters if certain criteria are met, or rather, not met.
Unlike some providers that might be more forgiving, Microsoft's systems often require a higher level of trust and adherence to best practices from the very beginning. This includes strong authentication, positive user engagement, and a clean sender history. A single negative signal, such as a high complaint rate or a low engagement rate, can significantly impact your deliverability.
The challenge is that the exact criteria used by these machine learning models are proprietary and constantly evolving. What works today might need adjustment tomorrow. This opacity can make troubleshooting difficult, as there isn't always a clear, explicit reason provided for why your emails are being filtered. This is why a holistic approach to deliverability, focusing on all known best practices, is crucial when sending to Outlook and Hotmail.

Outlook/Hotmail filtering

  1. Aggressive Filters: Highly sensitive to sender reputation, content, and user engagement metrics.
  2. Opaque Logic: Specific filtering rules are not publicly disclosed, making diagnosis challenging.
  3. Emphasis on User Feedback: Spam complaints and positive interactions (moving to inbox, adding to contacts) heavily influence future placement.

General email filtering

  1. Varied Strictness: Different ISPs and ESPs have varying levels of filtering strictness.
  2. More Predictable Rules: Some providers are more open about their filtering criteria or provide tools like Postmaster Tools.
  3. Broader Acceptance: While still important, individual user actions might have a less immediate impact on overall sender reputation compared to Microsoft.

Common reasons for landing in spam

One of the most frequent culprits for emails landing in junk is incomplete or incorrect email authentication. This includes SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. When these are not set up properly, or if they fail checks, email servers cannot verify that the sender is legitimate, leading to emails being flagged as suspicious. Microsoft, in particular, has very stringent authentication requirements, as outlined in their official guidance on email going to spam issues.
Another major factor is low engagement. If your subscribers aren't opening, clicking, or responding to your newsletters, email providers interpret this as a lack of interest. Worse yet, if recipients mark your emails as junk, it severely damages your sender reputation. Even a small number of complaints can negatively impact your deliverability for your entire list, especially with Microsoft's filters. This is often why confirmation emails, which users explicitly expect, still go to spam if the sender's reputation is poor.
Content issues also play a significant role. Using too many spammy keywords, having broken links, or linking to domains that are on a public blocklist (or blacklist) can trigger spam filters. Even seemingly innocuous content can be flagged if it deviates significantly from established norms for legitimate email, or if it resembles patterns associated with malicious emails. It's crucial to review both your email content and any linked external sites for potential issues.

Warming up a new domain

If your domain is relatively new, you might experience initial deliverability challenges while you build sender reputation. It takes time for email providers, especially Microsoft, to trust a new sending domain. Start with smaller sending volumes and gradually increase, ensuring high engagement from your early subscribers. Avoid sending large bursts of emails from a cold domain, as this can be perceived as spamming behavior and land you on a blocklist.

Strategies to improve deliverability

The most effective way to improve deliverability to Outlook and Hotmail is to foster strong engagement with your subscribers. This means sending content that your audience genuinely wants to receive and interact with. High open rates, click-through rates, and replies signal to email providers that your emails are valued, which boosts your sender reputation. Conversely, low engagement combined with a high percentage of Microsoft email accounts can lead to emails consistently going to the junk folder.
Actively encourage your subscribers to add your sending address to their safe senders list or address book. For confirmation emails, provide clear instructions on your thank-you page to check the junk folder if the email doesn't arrive immediately and how to move it to the inbox. While individual actions don't scale directly, collective positive engagement helps build your sender reputation with Microsoft's filters over time. You might also want to explore Outlook's new sender requirements.
Maintaining a clean and engaged email list is paramount. Implement a double opt-in process for all new subscribers. This verifies that email addresses are valid and that recipients genuinely want to receive your newsletters, reducing the likelihood of spam complaints and bounces. Regularly remove inactive subscribers who haven't opened or clicked your emails in a long time. These practices signal to email providers that you are a responsible sender committed to sending wanted mail.

Authentication type

Purpose

Impact on deliverability

SPF (Sender Policy Framework)
Authorizes specific IP addresses to send emails on behalf of your domain.
Prevents spoofing and ensures sender legitimacy. Essential for inbox placement.
DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail)
Adds a digital signature to outgoing emails, verifying content integrity.
Confirms the email hasn't been tampered with in transit. Crucial for trusted sending.
DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance)
Builds on SPF and DKIM, telling receiving servers what to do with unauthenticated emails and providing reports.
Strongly influences domain reputation and email filtering, especially with Microsoft and Gmail's new requirements.

Technical considerations for success

To ensure your emails don't fall into the Outlook/Hotmail spam trap, start by thoroughly checking your SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records. These DNS records are foundational for email authentication. Incorrect or missing records are red flags for email providers. Ensure your SPF record includes all IP addresses or sending services authorized to send email on your behalf. Your DKIM signature should be properly configured by your email service provider. For DMARC, even a relaxed policy of p=none can provide valuable insight through aggregated reports, helping you identify authentication failures. You can find a simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM on our site.
Your IP and domain reputation are critical. Even if your authentication is perfect, a poor reputation can lead to inboxing issues. This is especially true if your sending IP or domain is listed on any major blocklist (or blacklist). Regularly check if you've been placed on a blocklist. Being listed indicates that your sending practices might be seen as suspicious by other email providers, which can then negatively impact your deliverability to Microsoft domains as well. Understanding what happens when your domain is on an email blacklist is a crucial step.
Additionally, engage with outlook.com logoMicrosoft's Smart Network Data Services (SNDS) and their Junk Mail Reporting Program (JMRP). SNDS provides data about your sending reputation to Hotmail and Outlook users, including junk mail statistics and blocklist status. JMRP allows you to receive copies of emails that Hotmail/Outlook users mark as junk, helping you identify problematic content or list segments. These tools offer direct insights into how Microsoft perceives your sending practices.
Example DMARC record (p=none policy)DNS
v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_reports@yourdomain.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_forensics@yourdomain.com; fo=1;

Moving forward with your newsletter

Addressing Outlook and Hotmail deliverability challenges requires a multi-faceted approach, combining robust technical setup with careful content and audience management. It's not uncommon for legitimate newsletters to face hurdles, especially with new domains or changes in sending patterns. However, consistent application of best practices yields significant improvements over time.
The key is patience and persistence. Monitor your metrics closely, pay attention to user feedback, and continuously refine your strategy. By prioritizing proper authentication, fostering strong engagement, and maintaining a clean sending reputation, you can significantly increase the likelihood of your newsletters consistently landing in the inbox, rather than the junk folder, for all your subscribers.

Views from the trenches

Best practices
Actively encourage subscribers to add your email address to their safe senders list or address book to improve inbox placement.
Implement double opt-in for all new subscribers to ensure a high-quality, engaged email list and reduce spam complaints.
Regularly monitor your email authentication records (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) to ensure they are correctly configured and aligned.
Segment your email list and send relevant content to specific groups, which can significantly boost engagement rates.
Consistently remove inactive subscribers to maintain a clean list and improve overall sender reputation metrics.
Common pitfalls
Ignoring low open and click rates from Microsoft domains, as this signals disinterest and can worsen deliverability.
Not configuring DMARC, SPF, and DKIM properly, leading to authentication failures and increased likelihood of landing in spam.
Sending to unengaged subscribers, which can result in high bounce rates or spam complaints, damaging sender reputation.
Using overly promotional or spammy language in subject lines and email body, triggering content-based spam filters.
Neglecting to monitor blocklists, which can lead to significant deliverability issues if your domain or IP is listed.
Expert tips
Utilize Microsoft's Smart Network Data Services and Junk Mail Reporting Program for direct insights into your sending reputation with Hotmail and Outlook.
For new domains, start with low sending volumes and gradually increase them over time (warm-up) to build a positive sender reputation.
Even if individual users move your email out of spam, the cumulative effect from many users is what truly improves deliverability at scale.
Provide a clear incentive for subscribers to confirm their subscription and contact you if they don't receive the confirmation email.
If your emails contain links to external sites, ensure those domains are not listed on any blocklists, as this can negatively affect deliverability.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks says they have virtually given up on Microsoft domains, only sending to those who have engaged in the last 15 days, due to consistent spam folder placement despite good open rates.
2020-06-11 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says that while Microsoft's machine learning can be difficult, good inbox placement is achievable, and giving up is not always feasible for senders with a large Microsoft audience.
2020-06-11 - Email Geeks

Frequently asked questions

DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard

What you'll get with Suped

Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing