Emails ending up in the spam folder is a common and frustrating challenge for senders, from individuals to large enterprises. It's often due to a complex interplay of factors that email providers use to protect their users from unwanted mail. These factors range from sender reputation and authentication to content quality and recipient engagement. Understanding these elements is key to improving your inbox placement.
Key findings
Sender reputation: Your sending domain and IP address history heavily influence whether your emails reach the inbox or are flagged as spam. A poor reputation can lead to consistent deliverability issues.
Authentication failures: Lack of proper authentication, like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, makes your emails appear suspicious and prone to spam filtering.
Content quality: The actual content of your email, including subject lines, images, and links, can trigger spam filters if it resembles typical spam patterns or uses certain keywords.
Low engagement: If recipients rarely open, click, or reply to your emails, and frequently mark them as spam or move them to trash, it signals to mailbox providers that your content is not valued, leading to future spam placement.
Blocklist inclusion: Being listed on an email blocklist (or blacklist) instantly flags your emails as spam by many providers. This often happens due to sending to spam traps or high complaint rates.
Implement authentication: Ensure your emails are properly authenticated with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to build trust with mailbox providers.
Maintain list hygiene: Regularly clean your email lists to remove inactive or invalid addresses, reducing bounces and spam trap hits.
Focus on engagement: Send relevant content to segmented audiences to encourage opens and clicks, signaling positive engagement. For more details on why emails go to spam, Kinsta offers a comprehensive guide on reasons why your emails go to spam.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often face the perplexing issue of their emails landing in spam, even when they diligently follow what they believe are best practices. Their experiences frequently highlight the immediate impact of user behavior, the unpredictability of spam filters, and the ongoing struggle to maintain good sender reputation. This perspective emphasizes practical, day-to-day challenges rather than deep technical roots.
Key opinions
Irony of spam: Marketers find it ironic when emails from deliverability companies or seemingly legitimate sources end up in spam, underscoring that no sender is immune.
User influence: Average users marking emails as spam, even if inadvertently or out of habit, significantly contribute to an email's or sender's poor reputation.
Provider neutrality: Even major providers like Microsoft or Google do not grant special privileges to their own internal emails, subjecting them to the same spam filtering rules.
One mailbox doesn't mean everything: While a single instance of an email landing in spam is notable, marketers recognize that overall deliverability across many mailboxes is more indicative of a real issue.
Key considerations
Content relevance: Marketers must focus on sending highly relevant and engaging content to reduce spam complaints and increase positive interactions.
Avoid spam triggers: Vigilance is required to avoid keywords, poor formatting, or excessive links that might trigger spam filters, as detailed by OptinMonster on common spam reasons.
Consent and expectations: Ensuring proper consent and setting clear expectations for email frequency and content can significantly reduce user-initiated spam reports.
Regular audits: Performing regular checks on email content and sender reputation helps proactively identify and fix issues before they escalate.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks notes that it is ironic when an email related to email analytics or deliverability lands in the spam folder, even if it happens rarely. This experience can be quite amusing despite the underlying deliverability challenge.
26 Oct 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks shares their personal experience, confirming that the email in question genuinely landed in their GSuite work account's spam folder, not due to any third-party app. They acknowledged that a single mailbox's outcome isn't definitive but found the situation humorous.
26 Oct 2023 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts highlight that spam folder placement is a nuanced outcome of sophisticated filtering systems that evaluate a sender's entire digital footprint. They often delve into the technical mechanisms behind reputation scoring, authentication protocols, and the impact of blacklists and spam traps. Their insights provide a deeper understanding of the 'why' behind spam placement, beyond surface-level observations.
Key opinions
Reputation is paramount: Both IP and domain reputation are crucial. A poor sending history, even if from a previous user of your IP, can negatively impact your deliverability.
Authentication is foundational: Properly configured SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are essential for proving sender legitimacy and preventing spoofing, which directly influences spam filtering.
Engagement signals: Positive engagement (opens, clicks, replies) and low negative engagement (spam complaints, deletions without opening) are key signals that inbox providers use to determine inbox placement.
Blocklists matter: Inclusion on a public or private email blacklist (or blocklist) can severely impact deliverability, especially to major ISPs.
Key considerations
Consistent sending: Maintaining a consistent sending volume and pattern helps build and stabilize your sender reputation with mailbox providers.
Feedback loops: Utilize feedback loops provided by ISPs to quickly identify and remove users who mark your emails as spam, preventing further reputation damage.
Segment your audience: Sending targeted content to segmented audiences improves engagement rates, which positively impacts your sender score.
Deliverability expert from SpamResource suggests that maintaining a consistent sending volume is crucial for building a stable sender reputation, as erratic sending patterns can negatively impact deliverability.
10 Mar 2024 - SpamResource
Expert view
Deliverability expert from Word to the Wise explains that spam traps are a critical factor in reputation management; sending to them can instantly lead to being blocklisted and impact overall deliverability.
05 Apr 2024 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
Official documentation from major email providers and industry bodies sets out clear technical requirements and best practices for email sending. This information is critical for understanding the baseline expectations for deliverability. It covers everything from required authentication standards to content guidelines and user management. Adhering to these documented standards is a non-negotiable step for any sender aiming for consistent inbox placement.
Easy unsubscribe: A clear, one-click unsubscribe mechanism is a fundamental requirement, significantly impacting user experience and reducing spam complaints.
Spam complaint thresholds: Exceeding very low spam complaint rates (e.g., 0.1-0.3%) can immediately trigger stricter filtering or blocklisting.
Reputation transparency: Tools like Google Postmaster Tools provide data on sender reputation and compliance.
Key considerations
Technical compliance: Ensure your DNS records for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are correctly configured and updated regularly to reflect changes in your sending infrastructure.
List management: Implement strict list acquisition practices (e.g., double opt-in) and promptly remove invalid or unengaged addresses to maintain list quality.
Content best practices: Adhere to content guidelines regarding image-to-text ratio, link quality, and avoidance of spammy phrasing, as outlined in documentation such as Mailchimp's guide on avoiding spam filters.
Monitoring and adaptation: Continuously review postmaster tool data and adapt your sending strategy based on performance metrics and evolving ISP requirements.
Technical article
Documentation from Kinsta highlights that issues like missing email authentication, poor sender reputation, and previous spammy content are primary reasons why emails are sent directly to the spam folder. Proper configuration is critical to avoid this.
20 Nov 2020 - Kinsta
Technical article
Mailchimp documentation on email filtering states that emails may end up in spam due to their content or subject line, noting that certain phrases are known to trigger spam filters. This underscores the need for careful content creation.