Email delays, particularly with a specific recipient like Gmail, can be frustrating and difficult to diagnose, especially when standard metrics like IP and domain reputation appear healthy. When the issue coincides with a new email template, like one from Coherent Path, it suggests a content-related trigger for the delays. Such delays, often ranging from one to four hours, typically indicate that Gmail's systems are processing the messages differently due to perceived content issues or a form of rate limiting. This can happen even if your basic email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is correctly configured.
Key findings
Content-related delays: New email templates can trigger delays if their content, formatting, or hidden elements are flagged by Gmail's filtering systems. This is a common reason for deliverability shifts.
Throttling or greylisting: Gmail might be intentionally delaying messages (throttling) or temporarily rejecting them (greylisting), requiring the sending server to retry. This often happens when content is suspicious or sending volume exceeds normal patterns for your reputation. You can learn more about resolving slow email delivery to Gmail.
Post-DATA issues: If messages are delayed after the DATA command in the SMTP conversation, it suggests Gmail has accepted the message but is processing its content before final delivery, indicating potential content filters are at play.
ESP-side delays: Sometimes delays occur within the Email Service Provider's (ESP) infrastructure, between when their MTA receives the message and when it attempts delivery to Gmail.
Reputation vs. content: Even with high IP and domain reputation, problematic content or a sudden change in sending patterns can trigger new scrutiny from Gmail.
Key considerations
Template changes: A new email template, even from a reputable source, can introduce elements that Gmail's filters dislike. This could include excessive images, too much code, or suspicious links. For more on this, see why new email templates affect deliverability with Gmail.
SMTP logs analysis: Thoroughly review SMTP logs from your ESP for specific deferral codes or messages from Gmail. These can provide direct clues as to why delays are occurring.
Test with old template: Send a few emails using the old, successful template to a small segment of Gmail recipients. If these deliver without delay, it strongly points to the new template as the root cause.
Header review: Examine the full email headers of a delayed message to trace the path and identify where the delay is introduced. This can pinpoint internal ESP delays versus recipient-side throttling. Learn more about email delays and notifications at Ask Leo!.
Content audit: Perform a detailed audit of the new template's HTML, links, image ratios, and text content for anything that could appear spammy or unusual to an inbox provider.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often face unexpected deliverability challenges, even when their core metrics seem fine. When a new email template is introduced and coincides with delivery delays, the immediate focus shifts to the template's content and structure. Marketers frequently rely on their ESP's reporting and basic checks to identify issues, but deep-seated content or throttling problems can be harder to spot without granular data.
Key opinions
Template as a trigger: Many marketers suspect that a recently implemented template, especially a new one, is often the cause of sudden deliverability shifts, even if it looks clean on the surface.
Reliance on ESP data: Marketers frequently check their ESP dashboards and Google Postmaster Tools, expecting clear indicators for problems, and are often puzzled when these tools report high reputation and no apparent errors despite delays.
Need for in-depth logs: The common sentiment among marketers is the need for more detailed SMTP logs from their ESP to truly understand deferral reasons.
Testing hypothesis: A practical first step is to isolate the variable by sending with a known good, older template to see if the delays persist.
Key considerations
Template content review: Carefully examine the new template for any changes in HTML structure, image-to-text ratio, or new tracking pixels that could be misinterpreted by Gmail. Read more on how new email templates affect deliverability.
Sending pattern shifts: Beyond the template, consider if there were any changes to sending volume, frequency, or recipient engagement around the time the delays began, as these can influence Gmail's throttling.
Header analysis tools: Utilize online email header analyzers to get a clearer picture of message routing and identify where the significant time gaps are occurring. This can sometimes reveal unexpected hops or processing delays.
ESP support engagement: Engage closely with your ESP's support team, providing them with specific examples of delayed emails and requesting comprehensive SMTP logs to assist in their investigation.
Recipient feedback loops: Monitor any recipient complaints about delays, and if possible, ask a few recipients of the new template to check their spam folders, as delays can sometimes precede outright spam filtering. More general information on email delays can be found on Quora.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks reports major delays at Gmail, ranging from one to four hours, which began approximately two to three weeks after starting to use a new Coherent Path template. Despite these significant delays, standard monitoring tools such as Google Postmaster Tools show no reported issues, with both IP and domain reputation listed as high. Bounce rates also appear normal, although comprehensive SMTP logs from the ESP are still pending to confirm any deferrals.
27 Apr 2021 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks indicates that initial analysis of the message through various tools has not revealed any obvious problems, leading to a suspicion that the new template might be the root cause of the deliverability issues. This highlights the challenge of diagnosing subtle content-related problems that might not immediately trigger standard warning flags.
27 Apr 2021 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts highlight that delays to Gmail, especially when Postmaster Tools reports are clear, often point to a nuanced content or sending behavior issue rather than a straightforward reputation hit. The challenge lies in distinguishing between internal ESP delays and intentional throttling by the recipient's mail server. The specific point in the SMTP conversation where the delay occurs (e.g., after the DATA command) is crucial for accurate diagnosis.
Key opinions
Post-DATA delays: Experts suggest that if Gmail accepts the message (after the DATA command) but then delays it, the issue is likely related to the message's content or internal processing, not a general IP/domain blocklist or low reputation.
ESP vs. Gmail: It's critical to determine whether the delay is happening within the ESP's infrastructure before attempting delivery to Gmail, or if Gmail itself is performing the delay (throttling or greylisting).
Greylisting possibility: Greylisting is a common tactic for delaying suspicious mail, requiring retries from the sending server. While not always the case, it's a potential cause for hour-long delays. For more details, refer to understanding email greylisting.
Insufficient data: Without full email headers and detailed SMTP logs from the ESP, diagnosing the exact cause of lengthy delays can be challenging.
Key considerations
Throttling investigation: If delays persist, investigate potential throttling from Gmail's side, which can occur due to content issues, sudden volume spikes, or changes in how the template's links/tracking are perceived. Consider why your email is getting throttled.
Header analysis depth: The full email headers are crucial for identifying specific relay points and timestamps, helping to pinpoint where delays are introduced. This requires careful parsing of each 'Received:' header.
Content variations: Test sending with a very plain text version of the email, or a minimal HTML version, to see if the template's complexity or specific elements are the cause of the content-based delays.
Engagement feedback: Even with high reputation, a new template might lead to subtle shifts in recipient engagement (e.g., fewer opens, more deletions), which can negatively impact future deliverability and lead to delays. Monitor user interaction closely.
IP/domain warming: If the new template is significantly different, Gmail might treat it as a new 'campaign type' and apply a form of content-based warming, which initially results in delays. Review strategies for boosting email deliverability rates.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests obtaining the full headers of the mail to properly diagnose the issue. Without complete header information, it is difficult to trace the message's journey and pinpoint where the delays are occurring.
27 Apr 2021 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks advises trying a different email template to confirm if the new template is indeed related to the observed delays. This method helps isolate the problem, confirming if the content or structure of the new template is the trigger for Gmail's actions.
27 Apr 2021 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
Email documentation and standards provide a framework for understanding how mail servers interact, but they also imply areas where delays can legitimately occur. SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) allows for temporary failures, which lead to retries and thus delays. Inbox providers implement various filtering and anti-abuse measures that can deliberately introduce delays based on content analysis, sender reputation, or even connection characteristics. While specific template analysis isn't covered, general guidelines on email content and formatting are relevant.
Key findings
SMTP deferrals: The SMTP protocol allows for temporary rejection codes (e.g., 4xx series), prompting sending servers to retry delivery later. These deferrals are a primary cause of legitimate email delays.
Content scanning: Mailbox providers perform deep content scanning on incoming messages to detect spam, malware, and phishing attempts. This process can introduce delays as the email is analyzed before being placed in the inbox, or rejected.
Throttling mechanisms: Inbox providers like Gmail use throttling to manage incoming mail volume and prevent abuse. This can slow down delivery for legitimate senders if their sending patterns or content trigger these mechanisms.
Header and body integrity: Discrepancies in email headers, improper MIME types, or malformed HTML within a template can sometimes lead to processing delays or rejections by strict receiving mail servers.
Key considerations
Compliance with standards: Ensure the Coherent Path template fully complies with email rendering standards and best practices, avoiding overly complex or non-standard HTML that might trip up Gmail's parsers. Our blog on What RFC 5322 Says vs. What Actually Works provides additional insight.
Image optimization: Large or unoptimized images within the template can slow down message processing and lead to delays, especially on mobile networks or for recipients with slower connections.
Link and tracking practices: Review how links are structured and if any new tracking parameters are introduced by the template. Suspicious or excessively long URLs can sometimes be flagged.
Email authentication: While Postmaster Tools reports good reputation, always double-check SPF, DKIM, and DMARC alignment, as authentication failures can lead to deferrals and delays, even if not explicitly shown as 'errors' in some dashboards. A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM can help here.
Technical article
Email standards documentation indicates that a delivery status notification (DSN) with a "delay" status often means that the receiving mail server has temporarily rejected the message. This requires the sending server to queue the message and retry delivery later, adhering to backoff algorithms.
20 Nov 2023 - RFC 3461 (SMTP DSNs)
Technical article
Mail server documentation clarifies that inbound mail servers frequently employ content filtering systems that scan email bodies for spam characteristics, phishing indicators, or malware. This process can inherently introduce a delay in message processing, especially for complex or suspicious content.