Suped

Summary

When emails are reported as 'sent' by your Email Service Provider (ESP) but are never received by a B2B client, especially without bounce errors, it indicates a complex deliverability challenge. This scenario often points to advanced filtering systems on the recipient's end, which may silently drop messages before they reach the recipient's inbox or even their internal IT's visible logs. Unlike typical bounces that provide explicit error codes, a 'silent drop' leaves senders in the dark, making diagnosis difficult.

What email marketers say

Email marketers often find themselves at a crossroads when their ESPs report successful delivery, yet B2B clients confirm they never received the emails. This discrepancy can be incredibly frustrating, leading to confusion about where the email actually ended up. Many marketers suspect that the issue lies with the recipient's advanced filtering systems, which operate beyond their immediate visibility and often do not provide bounce notifications.

Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks states they have a B2B customer who reports never receiving emails, despite the ESP indicating successful delivery with no bounce errors. They've verified the email addresses for typos and found none, leading them to believe the emails are being caught by a filter on the recipient's side. The marketer is at a loss because the client's IT team also claims to have no record of receiving the emails. This scenario highlights the common challenge of silent filtering where messages are dropped without notification, making diagnosis extremely difficult for senders and recipients alike.

26 Mar 2020 - Email Geeks

Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests confirming whether the email actually deployed from the sender's end and if it's a role address like sales@ or info@. Role addresses can sometimes be subject to stricter filtering rules or be unmonitored. They emphasize the importance of verifying the true delivery status beyond what the ESP reports, prompting further investigation into the path the email takes after leaving the sending platform.

26 Mar 2020 - Email Geeks

What the experts say

Deliverability experts understand that 'sent' status from an ESP does not equate to 'inbox placement.' They frequently point to the layers of protection that B2B organizations employ, which can intercept and dispose of emails without notifying the sender. This often involves hosted MX offerings or advanced security appliances that preprocess incoming mail before it reaches the client's internal servers.

Expert view

Deliverability expert from Email Geeks explains that if a recipient uses a hosted MX offering upstream of their local email servers, messages might be silently dropped before reaching on-site IT controls. This means the message is processed by an external service (like a cloud-based spam filter) and never forwarded to the client's internal system. They emphasize that the IT team's visibility might be limited to what happens *after* the hosted MX service, leading to their inability to find a record even if the email was received by an earlier point in the mail flow.

26 Mar 2020 - Email Geeks

Expert view

Deliverability expert from Email Geeks suggests that an ESP might silently drop emails to certain recipients due to historical complaints or other reasons, preventing them from even attempting delivery. This is typically on a platform-wide basis rather than per account. While acknowledging this is less likely for highly reputable ESPs like Pardot, they caution that less scrupulous providers might maintain larger never-send lists based on past abuse reports.

26 Mar 2020 - Email Geeks

What the documentation says

Technical documentation from email service providers, security vendors, and industry standards bodies outlines the various stages of email delivery and potential points of failure. While SMTP protocol dictates bounce messages for non-delivery, real-world implementations, especially in B2B environments, introduce layers that can bypass these notifications.

Technical article

MarTech documentation indicates that merely meeting authentication requirements is often insufficient for emails to consistently reach the inbox. It highlights that most senders overlook critical factors that influence deliverability, particularly in B2B environments with stringent filtering. This suggests that even with valid SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, emails can still be silently filtered if other signals, such as content, sender reputation, or recipient engagement, are poor, explaining why emails might be 'sent' but never seen by the client.

15 May 2025 - MarTech

Technical article

1827 Marketing documentation on email deliverability in 2025 emphasizes that new rules and higher standards, including stricter authentication requirements from providers like Microsoft, significantly impact B2B marketers. These changes mean that even minor non-compliance can lead to messages being blocked or silently dropped. It advises that senders need to go beyond basic compliance and adopt recommended practices to avoid hidden filtering, particularly when B2B clients report no receipt despite 'sent' status.

20 May 2025 - 1827 Marketing

9 resources

Start improving your email deliverability today

Get started