Summary
The bounce code 4.7.0 Too many concurrent connections indicates that the recipient mail server is temporarily refusing connections because your sending server (or IP address) is attempting to establish too many simultaneous connections. This is a common form of rate limiting used by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and Mailbox Providers (MBPs) to protect their infrastructure from overload or potential abuse. While it is a soft bounce, meaning the email might eventually be delivered after retries, persistent occurrences can lead to messages being discarded by your Email Service Provider (ESP).
Key findings
- Rate limiting: This bounce code is a direct result of the recipient's mail server enforcing connection limits to manage load and prevent abuse. Many systems implement similar rate-limiting measures for various protocols.
- Shared IP pools: If you are sending from a shared IP pool, the issue might stem from the cumulative volume of all senders using that IP, exceeding the recipient's connection limits. This can lead to intermittent issues that are hard to predict. Learn more about how connection limits are managed for deliverability.
- Sender reputation impact: While connection limits can be static, some recipient servers dynamically adjust them based on the sending IP's reputation. A lower sender score or questionable metrics can lead to stricter limits.
- Temporary failure: The 4.X.X bounce code signifies a temporary failure. Emails experiencing this bounce are usually queued for reattempt, and many will eventually be delivered. However, excessive retries can result in the ESP ultimately discarding the message.
Key considerations
- ESP role: For senders using an ESP, managing concurrent connections and rate limits typically falls to the ESP. They are responsible for configuring their servers to respect recipient limits. You can also explore how to fix server availability issues related to connections.
- Communication with ESP: If you are experiencing this bounce code regularly, it is crucial to contact your ESP's support team. Provide them with the full bounce message and the affected ISPs to help them investigate and adjust connection parameters if possible.
- Dedicated IP consideration: If using a shared IP pool, and connection limit issues persist, especially for critical transactional email, consider discussing a move to a dedicated IP with your ESP. This gives you more control over your sending reputation and connection behavior.
- Monitoring: Regularly monitor your bounce logs and deliverability metrics. Understanding which ISPs or B2B destinations are generating these specific bounces can provide valuable insights into where adjustments might be needed.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often face the 4.7.0 Too many concurrent connections bounce, particularly when using shared IP addresses for transactional email. Their primary concern is often the impact on deliverability and the difficulty in resolving these issues directly, as the responsibility largely lies with their Email Service Provider. Marketers emphasize the need for clear communication with ESPs and the challenges of inconsistent deliverability on shared pools.
Key opinions
- ESP control: Many marketers believe that the ability to adjust connection limits rests solely with the ESP, especially when using a platform like Mailgun.
- Shared IP quality: There's a strong sentiment that questionable SenderScore metrics or generally poor quality shared IP pools can contribute to these connection limit bounces. This highlights the importance of understanding your email domain reputation.
- Limited visibility: Marketers often report that ESP bounce interfaces provide minimal details, making it difficult to diagnose the exact cause of the 4.7.0 error.
- Persistent soft bounces: While temporary, repeated soft bounces for the same message can lead to the ESP eventually discarding it, impacting overall deliverability.
Key considerations
- Escalate to ESP: The first step for any marketer encountering this bounce consistently is to open a support ticket with their ESP to seek adjustments or insights.
- Consider dedicated IPs: If current shared IP performance is inconsistent, especially for business-critical transactional emails, moving to a dedicated IP is often seen as a viable solution to gain more control and stability.
- Identify problem ISPs: Even with limited bounce details, marketers should try to identify which ISPs or B2B mail servers are most frequently returning this bounce, as this can help the ESP in their investigation. This is related to managing rate limit exceeded errors.
- Understand temporary vs. permanent: Though a soft bounce, repeated failures can lead to permanent non-delivery. Marketers should understand their ESP's retry policies for temporary errors to prevent message loss.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests that connection limit issues, especially when using shared IPs for transactional email, may indicate a poor quality shared IP pool. They noted seeing questionable SenderScore metrics that might correlate with these bounces, affecting B2B destinations specifically.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks mentions that if the ESP's bounce interface provides minimal information, it becomes very challenging to diagnose the root cause of 'too many concurrent connections'. They emphasized the frustration of only getting a generic bounce code without specific ISP details.
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability clarify that the 4.7.0 Too many concurrent connections bounce is primarily a recipient-side rate-limiting mechanism. They stress that while it's a temporary error, underlying reputation issues or an overly aggressive sending pattern (especially from shared IP pools) can exacerbate the problem. Experts emphasize that the ESP is typically responsible for managing these connection limits on behalf of their users.
Key opinions
- ESP responsibility: Experts generally agree that unless the sender has direct control over their MTA's connection settings, it's the ESP's responsibility to configure and adjust outbound connection limits to comply with recipient server policies.
- Fixed vs. reputation-based limits: Recipient mailbox providers (MBPs) may enforce either a fixed limit on concurrent connections or dynamically adjust this limit based on the sending IP's real-time reputation. This makes the issue more complex, as good reputation management is key for improving email deliverability.
- Shared IP challenges: On shared IP pools, the collective sending behavior of all users impacts the IP's reputation and can trigger connection limits, even if a single client's traffic is clean. This leads to inconsistent issues that are hard to consistently address without ESP intervention. It is often a key issue related to Hotmail emails failing due to connection limits.
- Temporary nature: Despite being a soft bounce, experts confirm that if an ESP is unable to deliver a message after multiple retries due to persistent connection issues, the message may eventually be discarded as undeliverable.
Key considerations
- Proactive ESP management: Senders should expect their ESPs to proactively manage connection limits and adapt sending behavior based on feedback from recipient servers. This includes adjusting concurrent connections, retry intervals, and throttling.
- Dedicated IP for stability: For consistent high-volume or critical transactional email streams, experts strongly recommend considering a dedicated IP. This provides more stable connection management as resources are not shared, simplifying troubleshooting, particularly for Charter/Spectrum concurrent connection issues.
- Full bounce message analysis: While ESP dashboards may show limited info, full bounce messages (often found in raw logs) can provide critical context, including the specific recipient server and potential additional error details, essential for expert analysis.
- ISP-specific adjustments: Some ISPs or B2B custom MX setups might have unique, tighter connection policies. Experts may need to work directly with the ESP to request specific adjustments for these problematic destinations, as suggested by the Mailop.org best practices for SMTP connection management
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that unless Mailgun provides specific settings for concurrent connections, it is the ESP's responsibility to configure these limits to ensure proper mail flow.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests that 'too many concurrent connections' could be due to a fixed limit set by the Mailbox Provider or a decision based on the sender's reputation. They highlighted that only the ESP (Mailgun in this case) can change these limits.
What the documentation says
Official email documentation and best practices consistently highlight the importance of managing SMTP connections to ensure smooth email delivery and avoid overwhelming recipient servers. The 4.7.0 Too many concurrent connections bounce code reflects a fundamental aspect of mail server interaction: respecting the receiving server's capacity and policies. Documentation often advises implementing proper throttling and retry mechanisms to prevent such errors, which are designed to protect infrastructure from excessive load or perceived abuse.
Key findings
- RFC compliance: SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol), defined in RFCs like RFC 5321, dictates how mail servers communicate. While not explicitly defining 'too many concurrent connections', it lays the groundwork for error handling and temporary failures (4xx codes).
- Server resource management: Recipient mail servers implement connection limits to prevent resource exhaustion, such as CPU, memory, and network bandwidth, from a flood of incoming connections. This is a standard defensive measure.
- Throttling mechanisms: Mail server documentation often details configuration parameters for throttling outbound connections, including maximum concurrent connections per IP, per domain, or overall. Senders or their ESPs are expected to configure their systems to adhere to these limits.
- Reputation and dynamic limits: Some documentation indicates that modern mail systems can dynamically adjust connection limits based on the perceived reputation of the sending IP address, adding a layer of complexity to rate limit management.
Key considerations
- Proper retry logic: Sending systems must employ appropriate retry schedules for temporary bounce codes like 4.7.0. Retries should be spaced out to avoid repeatedly hitting the same connection limits. Proper retry logic is crucial for troubleshooting Postfix 'too many connections' errors.
- Postmaster guidelines: Consulting postmaster pages (e.g., Gmail Postmaster Tools, Outlook.com Postmaster) can provide specific guidelines or best practices for sending to those domains, which may include implicit or explicit advice on connection limits. You can find out more in our Ultimate Guide to Google Postmaster Tools.
- Capacity planning: High-volume senders, or those managing their own MTAs, should conduct thorough capacity planning to ensure their systems can handle peak sending volumes without exceeding typical recipient connection limits, especially for critical transactional email.
- Software configuration: Many mail server software packages (e.g., Postfix, Sendmail) offer granular controls over outbound connection concurrency. Administrators should configure these settings judiciously based on their sending volume and recipient mix.
Technical article
Technical Documentation from Postfix states that 'too many concurrent connections' typically results from an overwhelmed receiving server or an overly aggressive sending configuration. It recommends adjusting smtp_destination_concurrency_limit settings.
Technical article
RFC 5321, section 4.2.2, on the SMTP protocol indicates that temporary negative responses (4xx codes) are used when a server is temporarily unable to complete a request. This implicitly covers situations like 'too many concurrent connections' due to resource constraints.
Related resources
1 resources
Related pages
How are email message connection limits and concurrent outbound connections managed for deliverability?
What causes 'Server is not currently available, possibly due to too many connections' and how to fix it?
Why are my Hotmail emails failing due to connection limits and what can I do?
How to troubleshoot email bounce issues with Charter/Spectrum due to concurrent connections?
What does 'rate limit exceeded' mean in email delivery, and how do I troubleshoot it?
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
Why your emails fail: expert guide to improve email deliverability [2025]
Boost email deliverability rates: technical solutions from top performing senders
How to troubleshoot Postfix 'too many connections' errors after upgrading?
Email deliverability issues: getting your messages to the inbox in 2025
