Double DKIM implementation, while offering enhanced email authentication, can introduce complex errors, particularly the 'DKIM = Unknown' status for specific recipients. This summary explores the causes of these errors and effective troubleshooting methods.
Key findings
Sporadic failures: Errors often appear for a single recipient or a subset, indicating a highly specific issue rather than a broad misconfiguration.
Second key issues: When the first DKIM key functions correctly, the problem likely lies in the setup or interaction of the second DKIM signature.
MTA configuration: The Mail Transfer Agent (MTA) may not be signing emails correctly with the second key or may be interfering with the signature.
Header analysis: Detailed examination of email headers for the failing messages is crucial to pinpoint the exact failure point.
Yahoo-specific challenges: Yahoo Mail can sometimes present unique challenges with DKIM validation, particularly with multiple signatures.
Key considerations
Validate keys separately: Ensure each DKIM key is valid and properly published in DNS before attempting double implementation. For more information, read about when double DKIM is necessary.
Check body hash: A common cause of DKIM failure is modifications to the email body during transit, leading to a body hash mismatch. Learn how to fix DKIM body hash failures.
Review DMARC reports: Aggregate DMARC reports can offer insights into the overall DKIM authentication status across various receivers.
Consult mailer documentation: For specific issues, reviewing the documentation of your sending platform or MTA regarding DKIM setup can be beneficial. For more information, read how to fix invalid DKIM signature errors.
Isolate the issue: Send test emails to various recipients and email providers (e.g., Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo) to identify if the problem is specific to a recipient domain or a broader configuration.
Email marketers often face significant challenges when implementing advanced email authentication techniques like double DKIM, especially when troubleshooting sporadic errors. Their experiences highlight the need for clear diagnostic steps and reliable validation methods.
Key opinions
Recipient-specific issues are frustrating: Marketers frequently report issues that only affect a single recipient or a small group, making diagnosis difficult.
Focus on the basics first: The advice often leans towards ensuring the primary authentication mechanisms are flawless before adding complexity like double DKIM.
Impact on deliverability: Incorrect DKIM setup can directly lead to emails landing in spam or being rejected, impacting campaign performance.
Debugging complexity: Analyzing email headers and understanding authentication results can be daunting for those without deep technical expertise.
Key considerations
Thorough testing: Implement comprehensive testing to various mailbox providers after any DKIM configuration change. This helps identify why DKIM fails at some ISPs.
Monitor DMARC reports: Regularly review DMARC aggregate and forensic reports to detect authentication failures. Understanding how to troubleshoot DMARC failures is key.
Avoid hasty changes: When encountering issues, avoid making multiple changes simultaneously, as this can complicate troubleshooting.
Leverage community knowledge: For specific issues, sometimes community forums can offer quick insights. For example, some users on Spiceworks report body hash failing.
Marketer view
Email Marketer from Email Geeks explains they are trying to implement double DKIM specifically for Yahoo, and while it works for most users, one recipient consistently sees 'DKIM = Unknown' in the email header. This indicates a problem that is not universal, but specific.
28 Nov 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks states that the first DKIM key was working fine prior to implementing the double DKIM setup, suggesting the issue is directly related to the new configuration or how the second key interacts with existing settings.
28 Nov 2022 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Deliverability experts bring invaluable insights into diagnosing and resolving complex DKIM errors, particularly in scenarios involving double DKIM. Their experience often points to systematic debugging and a deep understanding of email authentication protocols.
Key opinions
Prioritize the first key: Experts recommend ensuring the initial DKIM key is functioning perfectly before introducing a second one, as this eliminates a major variable.
Gmail as a benchmark: Gmail's robust system is considered a reliable indicator for correct email authentication. If it works there, issues elsewhere might be recipient-specific. This aligns with advice on why Microsoft DKIM fails when Gmail passes.
Header analysis is critical: Dissecting the email header provides the most direct clues to the nature of the DKIM failure.
MTA role in signing: The Mail Transfer Agent plays a crucial role in applying DKIM signatures; its configuration for multiple keys must be precise.
Key considerations
Verify DNS records: Confirm that all DKIM TXT records are correctly published and accessible via DNS lookups for both selectors.
Check for message modifications: Intermediary servers or processes can alter messages, leading to a body hash mismatch. This is a common cause for DKIM failing body hash verification.
Systematic troubleshooting: Isolate variables by testing single DKIM setups before enabling double DKIM, then gradually introduce complexity.
Consult technical documentation: Refer to the specific DKIM implementation guides for your MTA or sending platform. A Microsoft blog post discusses processing messages with multiple DKIM signatures.
Expert view
Deliverability Expert from Email Geeks suggests that Google is the benchmark for determining if email is authenticating correctly due to its robust system and ease of result retrieval. They also note that Microsoft has historically had issues with breaking authentication.
18 Nov 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Deliverability Expert from Email Geeks advises focusing on fixing any problems with the first DKIM key before attempting to add a second one, highlighting the importance of a stable foundation.
28 Nov 2022 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
Official documentation and technical guides provide the foundational understanding of DKIM, its implementation, and the common pitfalls that can lead to authentication failures. They are essential for accurate configuration and troubleshooting, especially with complex setups like double DKIM.
Key findings
Multiple DKIM signatures: Email standards allow for multiple DKIM signatures, but their processing can vary across mailbox providers.
DNS record accuracy: Correctly configured DKIM TXT records in DNS are paramount for successful validation.
Body/Header canonicalization: Changes to the email content or headers during transit can invalidate DKIM signatures, leading to body hash failures.
Selector usage: Different selectors allow for multiple DKIM keys for the same domain, enabling scenarios like double DKIM.
Key considerations
DKIM record validation: The initial step in troubleshooting is to validate the DKIM record using a checker to detect errors. This can help to fix a not valid DKIM signature.
Alignment requirements: Ensure that the DKIM 'd=' tag aligns with the 'From' domain in the email header for DMARC pass.
Selector management: Properly manage DKIM selectors, especially when implementing multiple keys, to avoid conflicts or incorrect key usage. See a guide to DKIM selector name examples.
Temporary errors (TempError): Some errors are transient. Understanding DKIM TempError and how to fix it is important for diagnosis.
Technical article
Documentation from AutoSPF states that the first step to fix an invalid DKIM signature error is to run the DKIM record through a validator to detect any mistakes, emphasizing a diagnostic approach.
20 Oct 2024 - AutoSPF
Technical article
GoDMARC Knowledge Base documentation identifies DNS configuration errors, such as missing or incorrect entries, as the most common cause of DKIM signature errors. This highlights the critical role of DNS.