Suped

What are the considerations for choosing ReturnPath for email deliverability?

Summary

Choosing an email deliverability vendor like ReturnPath involves weighing various factors, from their suite of services to their pricing model and market reputation. Historically, ReturnPath was a dominant force in email deliverability, offering tools for inbox placement, sender reputation monitoring, and certifications. However, the landscape has evolved significantly, with new competitors and changes to ReturnPath's ownership and service offerings.

What email marketers say

Email marketers often approach deliverability tools with practical considerations, focusing on how these platforms directly impact their campaigns, inbox placement rates, and overall ROI. While many acknowledge the historical significance of ReturnPath, the recent changes under Validity and the rise of other tools have led to a more cautious and comparative approach.

Marketer view

An email marketer from Email Geeks indicates that ReturnPath offers many different products. They suggest that potential users need to specify which aspects or tools they are interested in, as a blanket assessment of the entire suite might not be useful for making an informed decision about onboarding the platform.It's not just a single tool; it's a collection of services.

09 Jul 2019 - Email Geeks

Marketer view

A marketer from DeBounce.io emphasizes the crucial role of the return-path header in maintaining high email deliverability and minimizing bounce rates. This technical element directly influences sender reputation, making its proper configuration and management vital for any email marketing strategy.Monitoring and optimizing this header is a fundamental practice for ensuring emails reach their intended inboxes and do not adversely affect sender standing.

02 Dec 2024 - DeBounce.io

What the experts say

Email deliverability experts offer a more nuanced perspective on ReturnPath, often considering its historical influence, evolving market position, and the technical underpinnings of its services. Their insights typically delve into the efficacy of specific features like whitelisting in the current email ecosystem, emphasizing a data-driven approach over brand loyalty.

Expert view

An expert from Email Geeks notes that a competing deliverability platform maintains a fundamentally different approach. This distinction primarily revolves around the belief that whitelists and 'pay-to-play' models are becoming obsolete in the current email deliverability landscape. They suggest that while both firms offer valuable insights, their core philosophies about achieving inbox placement diverge significantly.This highlights an industry shift away from relying on paid certifications towards a greater emphasis on organic sender reputation and engagement.

09 Jul 2019 - Email Geeks

Expert view

An expert from Word to the Wise suggests that reliance on third-party certifications should be balanced with direct engagement metrics. They emphasize that while some certifications provide valuable data points, ultimate deliverability hinges on how well a sender manages their list hygiene and engages with their audience. The focus should increasingly be on building a strong, organic sender reputation through consistent positive sending behavior and user interaction.

20 Feb 2024 - Word to the Wise

What the documentation says

Official documentation and technical guides often detail the specific functions and importance of various email deliverability components, including the return-path header itself, and implicitly, the role of services that monitor or certify aspects of email sending. This information typically highlights the technical specifications and underlying mechanisms that influence whether an email reaches the inbox.

Technical article

Mailjet's documentation on return-path customization states that the return-path email header is essential for tracking and handling bounce messages. It specifies the address where non-delivery reports (NDRs) are sent, making it crucial for maintaining a clean mailing list and ensuring that senders are aware of deliverability issues. Customizing this header is recommended for better bounce management and overall email campaign performance.

20 Apr 2025 - Mailjet

Technical article

DeBounce.io's blog explains that the return-path header significantly contributes to high email deliverability and low bounce rates, directly influencing sender reputation. They highlight that this header is a critical component for email systems to process undeliverable messages correctly, preventing them from negatively impacting a sender's standing with Internet Service Providers (ISPs).Proper management of the return-path is therefore a foundational element of effective email sending.

10 Nov 2024 - DeBounce.io

9 resources

Start improving your email deliverability today

Get started