Summary
The practice of sending email seed lists separately from your main email campaigns is a topic with nuanced considerations. While including seed addresses within your regular sends offers real-time insights into inbox placement fluctuations, sending them separately generally won't negatively impact your sender reputation or deliverability stats, assuming the volume of seed emails remains small relative to your total sends. The primary trade-off lies in the depth of real-time monitoring versus the administrative ease and security of a gated seed list process.
Key findings
- Real-time insights: Integrating seed addresses directly into your primary send allows for granular, minute-by-minute monitoring of inbox placement and deliverability wobbles across different mailbox providers during the send itself. MailMonitor highlights this benefit of seed testing.
- Engagement signals: Seed lists typically do not generate engagement signals. If sent separately, this lack of engagement usually won't harm your overall deliverability metrics due to the low volume of seed emails compared to your main audience.
- Administrative control: Separating seed sends can be beneficial for large organizations that want to maintain strict control and prevent accidental misuse of seed lists.
- Approximation of data: While less precise than integrated sends, separate seed sends still provide valuable approximate data regarding inbox placement and potential issues. Sparkle.io notes that seed lists catch issues.
Key considerations
- Accuracy limitations: Seed lists provide a snapshot based on default filter settings, not individual user preferences. Understanding these limitations is crucial.
- Frequency of testing: Automated, separate seed sends for testing or demos generally do not harm measured deliverability, even without a concurrent large send.
- Holistic view: Deliverability is complex, and seed list data is just one data point. It's important to look at the overall picture, including engagement metrics from your actual audience, when evaluating performance. Learn more about why seed list results differ.
- Volume threshold: Any negative impact from seed sends would only occur if the volume were disproportionately high, far exceeding typical testing practices.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often seek a balance between comprehensive deliverability insights and practical operational management. Many recognize the benefits of integrating seed lists directly into major sends for granular, real-time data. However, for organizations with strict internal processes or large email volumes, the administrative overhead of combining sends can lead to considering separate seed list deployments. Marketers weigh these factors, often concluding that the potential downsides of separate sends are minimal compared to the practical advantages for their workflows, as long as the core purpose of deliverability testing is still served.
Key opinions
- Operational feasibility: For some large organizations, administering seeds within the main send is less feasible due to security or process constraints. Separating them simplifies this management.
- Minimal negative impact: The lack of engagement signals from a small, separate seed send is generally not considered problematic for overall sender reputation or deliverability, especially if the volume is low.
- Approximate data value: Even if not providing real-time send-through data, separate seed sends can still capture approximate deliverability and inbox placement insights. This is a key part of running an email deliverability test.
- Balancing pros and cons: Marketers frequently weigh the deeper insights from integrated sends against the practicalities of separate sends, choosing the option that best fits their organizational needs without significant negative impact.
Key considerations
- Seed list administration: Proper setup and management of seed lists are essential regardless of the sending method. Explore methods for setting up seed lists.
- Impact on analytics: Some marketers recommend a second, separate send to avoid impacting primary campaign analytics, particularly engagement metrics. As discussed on HubSpot's community forum, this approach helps maintain clean data.
- Data interpretation: Marketers should be aware of the inherent limitations of seed list data, acknowledging that it might not perfectly reflect real user inbox placement due to individual filter settings.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains their approach, stating that they were trying to weigh the pros and cons because, for some large organizations, administering seeds within the main send is something they want to keep gated so they are not accidentally misused. This highlights a common challenge in email operations, where security and control often influence technical decisions.
Marketer view
Email marketer from HubSpot Community states that they would recommend setting up a second separate send for every email as part of your process. This approach helps avoid impacting primary analytics and provides a cleaner data set for evaluating campaign performance.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts generally agree that while integrating seed lists into a full email send provides the most granular, real-time insights, sending them separately is unlikely to cause significant harm to sender reputation or deliverability. They emphasize that seed list data is a valuable, albeit limited, data point. It's crucial to understand the scope of what seed lists can reveal (e.g., default filter behavior) and to interpret their results within a broader context of overall campaign performance and user engagement. The volume of seed list sends is typically too small to negatively influence domain or IP reputation.
Key opinions
- Integrated sends advantages: Including seeds within the main send offers feedback on deliverability and inbox placement wobbles throughout the sending process, providing minute-by-minute insights.
- Limited impact of separate sends: Sending to a seed list separately, even without engagement signals, is generally not problematic. The volume is usually too low to significantly impact deliverability statistics.
- Usefulness of seed data: Despite some skepticism, seed lists provide useful insights into default mailbox provider filter settings and are a valid data point for deliverability monitoring.
- Holistic perspective: Deliverability data points should be viewed as moments in time, requiring a broader assessment to understand true performance, especially when seed results differ from actual engagement. This relates to how reliable seed list data is.
Key considerations
- Seed list providers: Paid services exist that provide and manage seed lists, offering programmatic collection and reporting of email disposition. These services are a common method for obtaining seed lists, though their value and limitations should be understood.
- DIY seed lists: It is possible to create a poor man's seedlist by setting up accounts at various mailbox providers and manually checking them.
- Engagement versus placement: Sometimes, clients may show poor seed list placement (e.g., going to spam), but still achieve desired engagement metrics with their actual audience, indicating the need for a balanced view of data.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from Email Geeks states that if you include seeds during the full (big) send, you gain feedback on deliverability or inbox placement wobbling throughout the send. This is a significant advantage for real-time monitoring and issue detection.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from SpamResource suggests that the primary purpose of a seed list is to identify if emails are landing in the inbox, spam folder, or promotions tab across various providers. They explain that this visibility is crucial for proactive campaign optimization.
What the documentation says
Official documentation from email service providers and deliverability platforms often focuses on the utility of seed lists for pre-deployment testing. They typically outline the process of uploading and targeting seed lists to assess inbox placement. While the documentation may not explicitly recommend or dissuade separate sends, the underlying purpose of seed testing—to identify potential issues before a full deployment—remains consistent. The emphasis is on gaining visibility into how different mailbox providers process and categorize the email, allowing senders to make necessary adjustments to content or sending strategy.
Key findings
- Pre-deployment insight: Seed lists are primarily used to identify potential problems, such as emails going to spam folders, before a large-scale send. Bookyourdata emphasizes this role.
- Content and rendering checks: Beyond deliverability, seed lists are critical for checking how an email appears across various devices and mail clients, and for catching typos or rendering issues, as noted by Sparkle.io.
- Configuration for testing: Documentation often instructs users to upload seed lists and target them specifically for testing purposes before deploying the main campaign. This is detailed in CleverTap's user documentation.
- Not for IP warming: Some documentation explicitly warns against using seed lists for IP warming, as the lack of engagement from seed accounts can negatively impact the reputation of a new IP address, as highlighted by Bloomreach.
Key considerations
- Understanding disposition: Seed lists help marketers understand where their emails land (inbox, promotions, spam). This insight allows for adjustments to improve inbox placement. Our own guide on fixing spam issues delves into this.
- Purpose of testing: The core documentation purpose of seed lists is to identify issues early, allowing for mitigation before a mass audience receives potentially problematic emails.
Technical article
Documentation from CleverTap User Docs instructs that to send an email to a seed list, you must first upload the list to their platform. They clarify that once the upload is complete, you must target the list separately before deploying the main campaign, reinforcing the typical workflow.
Technical article
Documentation from Sparkle.io states that seed lists effectively catch embarrassing typos, reveal which emails are destined for spam folders, and demonstrate exactly how a message will appear across diverse devices. This highlights their utility for quality assurance.
Related resources
5 resources
Related pages
How accurate are seed lists for email deliverability testing?
How valuable are seed lists for email marketing and what are their limitations?
How reliable is email deliverability data from seed lists?
Why do seed list deliverability results often differ from organic engagement data?
What are the best methods for setting up an email seed list for internal stakeholders?
How to run an email deliverability test: A proven checklist
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024 and how to fix it
How email blacklists actually work: a simple guide
What does it mean when your email is blacklisted?
What happens when your domain is put on a blocklist?
