Summary
Understanding why an SPF record might be deemed "too long" can be confusing, as it often refers to two distinct but related issues. While a single DNS TXT record (where SPF records reside) has a character limit of 255, the more common challenge relates to the DNS lookup limit of 10. Exceeding either of these limits can cause SPF authentication to fail, leading to email deliverability issues and potentially impacting your sender reputation.
Key findings
- TXT record length: While an SPF record itself might appear short in characters, the actual length limitation applies to the entire DNS TXT record, which includes the v=spf1 declaration and all included mechanisms.
- Byte count matters: The 255-character limit for a single TXT string is actually a byte limit, which means special characters can consume more than one byte, reducing the effective character count. If your record exceeds this, it needs to be split into multiple quoted strings within the same record.
- DNS lookup limit: The more common and critical issue is the 10-DNS lookup limit. Each mechanism in your SPF record that requires a DNS lookup (e.g., include, a, mx) counts towards this limit. Exceeding it results in a SPF PermError.
- Impact on deliverability: A broken SPF record, whether due to character or lookup limits, can cause emails to fail authentication, increasing the likelihood of them being marked as spam or rejected by recipient mail servers.
Key considerations
- Consolidate records: If you have multiple SPF records (which is technically invalid and can cause issues), consolidate them into a single record. RFC 7208 specifies that a domain must not have multiple SPF TXT records.
- Use subdomains: Consider using subdomains for different sending services, each with its own SPF record. This helps manage the lookup count for your primary domain.
- Utilize SPF flattening: SPF flattening is a technique where included domains are resolved to their IP addresses at the time the SPF record is generated, reducing the need for multiple DNS lookups during validation. This can significantly alleviate lookup limit issues.
- Remove unnecessary records: Review your DNS TXT records for old or unused entries, especially verification records (like Google Site Verification) that might be contributing to overall TXT record size. For Google verification, a CNAME alternative is often available and preferred.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often encounter issues with SPF records being too long, typically when integrating multiple email service providers (ESPs) or third-party sending services. The common misconception is that the SPF record length refers purely to the character count of the v=spf1 string itself. However, marketers quickly learn that the limitations extend to the total DNS TXT record size and, more critically, the number of DNS lookups required to validate the SPF record. This can lead to unexpected deliverability problems, as recipient servers reject emails due to authentication failures.
Key opinions
- Complexity grows with services: As marketers onboard more sending platforms, their SPF records tend to expand rapidly, making it difficult to stay within the 10-lookup limit without careful management.
- Character vs. lookup confusion: Many marketers initially confuse the 255-character limit for a single TXT string with the SPF lookup limit, only realizing the difference after troubleshooting authentication failures.
- Hidden TXT records: Non-SPF related TXT records, such as domain verification codes, can contribute to the overall byte length of the DNS TXT record for the root domain, unknowingly pushing it over limits.
- Impact on deliverability: SPF validation failures are a common cause of emails landing in spam folders or being outright rejected, negatively impacting campaign performance and sender reputation.
Key considerations
- Audit regularly: Periodically review your SPF record and other TXT records to remove outdated or unnecessary entries, like old domain verification strings or unused ESP includes.
- Prioritize includes: Only include sending services that genuinely need to send email on behalf of your domain. If a service rarely sends, consider if it's truly essential to include it in your primary SPF record.
- Leverage subdomains: For different types of email (e.g., transactional, marketing, internal), use distinct subdomains. Each subdomain can have its own SPF record, helping to distribute the lookup load and keep the root domain's SPF concise. Find out more about DMARC record placement for subdomains.
- Use DNS tools: Utilize online SPF record validators and DNS lookup tools to regularly check your SPF record's length and lookup count. This proactive approach can prevent deliverability issues before they impact campaigns.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains that they thought the SPF record's length was solely based on the character count of the SPF string itself. They were surprised to learn that the entire TXT record's byte size contributes to the "too long" error reported by validators, even if the SPF string seems short. This was a new and valuable lesson learned in their deliverability journey.
Marketer view
Email marketer from DuoCircle suggests that a common issue marketers face is the SPF lookup limit, not just the character count. They advise that integrating many email sending services can quickly push an SPF record beyond the allowed 10 DNS lookups, leading to authentication failures. This often results in emails being filtered as spam or rejected by recipient servers.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts consistently emphasize that while the 255-character per string limit for DNS TXT records is a factor, the primary concern for SPF records becoming "too long" almost always stems from exceeding the 10-DNS lookup limit. They highlight that SPF failures due to excessive lookups (a PermError) are a significant cause of deliverability issues, often leading to emails being rejected outright or sent to the spam folder. Experts advocate for careful optimization and management of SPF records to maintain proper email authentication and avoid impact on sender reputation.
Key opinions
- Lookup limit is critical: The 10-DNS lookup limit is the most common reason for SPF records being flagged as "too long" and resulting in failures, not just the character length of the TXT record itself.
- Beware of indirect lookups: Mechanisms like include and mx can lead to multiple nested lookups, quickly consuming the allowed limit. Each A record or MX record within an included domain also counts.
- Single SPF record rule: Having multiple SPF records on a single domain is a common misconfiguration that leads to SPF failures, as only the first SPF record encountered will be used, and subsequent ones will be ignored.
- TXT record byte size: While less frequent, exceeding the 255-byte limit for a single TXT string (or 512 bytes for the total record, depending on DNS software) requires splitting the string into multiple quoted parts within the same record, even for non-SPF TXT records.
Key considerations
- SPF flattening: This technique involves replacing include mechanisms with the resolved IP addresses of the included domains, effectively reducing DNS lookups at validation time. This is a powerful method for managing lookup limits.
- Dedicated sending subdomains: Experts advise using distinct subdomains (e.g., m.yourdomain.com) for marketing, transactional, or other email streams. Each subdomain can have its own SPF record, preventing the root domain's SPF from becoming overly complex and exceeding limits. This helps to avoid issues like SPF TempError.
- DNS optimization: Prioritize direct ip4 and ip6 mechanisms over include mechanisms where possible to reduce lookups. Remove ptr mechanisms, as they are rarely needed and cause additional lookups.
- Leverage CNAMEs for verification: Whenever an alternative verification method via CNAME is available (e.g., for Google services), use it instead of adding more TXT records to the root domain. This keeps the valuable root TXT space clear for authentication records. This relates to how to resolve "CharacterStringTooLong" errors.
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks clarifies that an SPF record appearing too long is typically due to exceeding the 10-DNS lookup limit, not merely the string's character count. They highlight that each "include" statement, unless it leads to a simple IP address, counts as a lookup. This is a critical distinction for maintaining effective email authentication.
Expert view
Email expert from Word to the Wise emphasizes that TXT records on the root domain are incredibly valuable and should not be wasted on unnecessary entries. They recommend using alternative verification methods, such as CNAMEs, whenever available to preserve this space for critical authentication records like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. This proactive management helps avoid length limitations.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and RFCs (Request for Comments) clarify the technical limitations surrounding DNS TXT records and SPF. The core standards define that a single TXT record string can hold up to 255 characters (bytes). However, they also permit breaking longer values into multiple quoted strings within a single TXT record. More importantly, RFC 7208, which defines SPF, specifies a crucial limit of 10 DNS lookups during SPF validation. Exceeding this limit results in a "PermError" (Permanent Error), indicating a fatal validation failure that can prevent emails from being delivered.
Key findings
- TXT record string length: DNS TXT records are limited to 255 characters (bytes) per string literal. If the content, such as an SPF record, exceeds this, it must be split into multiple concatenated strings enclosed in double quotes within the same record.
- 10-DNS lookup limit: RFC 7208 states that SPF validation must not perform more than 10 DNS lookups that resolve SPF mechanisms (a, mx, ptr, exists, and include).
- PermError consequence: Exceeding the 10-lookup limit results in a SPF PermError, indicating that the SPF record is malformed or too complex to validate, and the authentication will fail.
- Single SPF record requirement: A domain must not have multiple SPF TXT records published; only the first one encountered during validation will be used, rendering others ineffective. This can be a source of broken SPF records.
Key considerations
- Concatenation for long strings: If an SPF record's string exceeds 255 characters, it should be broken into multiple double-quoted strings, which DNS will automatically concatenate. For example, "v=spf1 include:_spf.example.com" "include:_spf2.example.org ~all".
- Minimize lookups: To stay within the 10-lookup limit, use IP addresses directly with ip4 or ip6 mechanisms where possible, rather than relying on multiple include statements that trigger additional lookups. For DNS record placement, consult this guide.
- Avoid ptr mechanism: The ptr mechanism is deprecated and inefficient, requiring reverse DNS lookups that count against the 10-lookup limit and can cause performance issues.
- Use DMARC for reporting: Implement DMARC alongside SPF to receive reports on authentication failures, including SPF PermErrors. These reports provide visibility into whether your SPF record is failing due to length or lookup issues. Learn more about how to fix SPF lookup limit errors.
Technical article
Documentation from Amazon Web Services (AWS) explains how to configure TXT records that exceed the 255-character limit for a single string. They clarify that the value should be broken into multiple strings, each enclosed in double quotation marks. For example, '"String_1" "String_2"' will be concatenated by the DNS resolver. This is crucial for long SPF records.
Technical article
Documentation from DuoCircle outlines the concept of SPF lookup limits and how to resolve them. They define the SPF lookup limit as the maximum number of DNS queries performed during SPF record validation, typically 10. Exceeding this limit invalidates the SPF record, and they recommend SPF flattening to optimize records by replacing includes with IP addresses.
Related resources
7 resources
Related pages
How do broken SPF records, like those with too many DNS lookups or exceeding size limits, affect email deliverability and authentication?
How do SPF 'a' records affect DNS lookups and the 10-lookup limit, and what are the best practices?
Why does Google domain verification with TXT records fail and CNAME records work better?
Does a subdomain used for sending emails need its own SPF record?
Demystifying the SPF TempError in your DMARC reports
Why your emails fail at Microsoft: the hidden SPF DNS timeout
Where should SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records be placed for email authentication?
How to troubleshoot SPF authentication issues with multiple ESPs, subdomains, and CNAMEs?
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
Solving the SPF alignment puzzle for google workspace alias domains
