Summary
The X-Originating-IP header, a non-standard email header, reveals the original IP address from which an email was sent. While it can aid in tracing abusive senders and potentially influence filtering decisions, its presence raises concerns about privacy and security by potentially exposing internal network information or even employee home IP addresses. For deliverability, its impact is often debated, with many experts suggesting minimal direct influence on inbox placement when removed, provided other authentication standards like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are properly configured. However, some acknowledge its historical use in distinguishing shared IP traffic, which could indirectly affect reputation.
Key findings
- Traceability: The header is often used by mail servers to identify and track the source of an email, especially for abuse detection.
- Deliverability impact: While it has been historically used in filtering decisions, particularly by larger ISPs to manage traffic from shared IPs, its removal generally has no direct negative influence on email deliverability today, assuming proper email authentication is in place.
- Security and privacy concerns: The primary concern with this header is its potential to leak internal IP addresses, revealing corporate network topology or even individual user home IP addresses.
- Filtering trust: When trusted, this header can contribute to filtering decisions, both positively (for shared IP reputation) and negatively (for abusive senders).
Key considerations
- Risk versus benefit: The security and privacy risks of exposing internal IPs often outweigh the minimal, if any, deliverability benefits of retaining the X-Originating-IP header.
- Header scrutiny: While some believe more information leads to closer scrutiny, filters will examine messages regardless. Focus on legitimate sending practices rather than trying to obfuscate common headers.
- Non-standard vs. standard headers: Distinguish between non-standard headers like X-Originating-IP and standard Received headers. Removing Received headers is generally discouraged as it can hinder legitimate mail flow and tracing, though it may be possible to remove internal server names and IPs from these.
- System-specific impacts: Some mail systems (like Zimbra) might rely on certain headers for internal processes, such as bounce handling. Ensure removal does not disrupt essential functionality.
What email marketers say
Email marketers and administrators frequently question the necessity of the X-Originating-IP header, often driven by a desire to optimize deliverability and enhance security. They tend to advocate for minimizing unnecessary information in email headers, fearing that excessive data could lead to increased scrutiny from spam filters or unwanted exposure of internal network details.
Key opinions
- Questioning utility: Marketers often ask if the X-Originating-IP header provides any genuine benefit for email deliverability or if it should be removed.
- Principle of least information: A common belief among senders is to avoid including any unnecessary information in headers, as they perceive more data might lead to greater scrutiny from filters.
- Privacy concerns: There's a strong emphasis on the potential for the header to expose internal corporate IP addresses or employee home IPs, raising security and privacy issues.
- Recommendation for removal: Many marketers lean towards recommending removal if the header doesn't offer a clear, beneficial impact on deliverability.
Key considerations
- Internal versus external impact: While internal IPs might be exposed, the actual impact on external email deliverability (inbox placement) is often minimal compared to factors like sender reputation and authentication.
- Perceived versus actual scrutiny: Filters will always scrutinize emails. Removing one non-standard header is unlikely to significantly alter the level of scrutiny. It's more about the content and sender reputation than minor header details.
- System-specific behavior: Be aware that mail systems like Zimbra might insert these headers as part of their default configuration, and their removal might require specific administrative actions.
- Focus on core deliverability: Prioritize robust email authentication standards, maintaining a healthy sender reputation, and sending valuable content to avoid landing on a blacklist.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks asks about the utility of the X-Originating-IP header for deliverability and whether it should be removed. They are specifically referring to emails originating from Zimbra, which includes this header.
Marketer view
Marketer from Mutant Mail Blog indicates that while the X-Originating-IP header helps in pinpointing message sources, it comes with inherent flaws such as spoofing risks and significant privacy concerns. This suggests a careful balance is needed when considering its presence.
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability and security often provide a balanced perspective on the X-Originating-IP header. They acknowledge its historical use by large ISPs for internal filtering and even for reputation management (e.g., with shared IPs), but largely agree that its removal poses minimal, if any, direct negative impact on deliverability. Their primary concern with its presence revolves around privacy and security, particularly the unintended exposure of internal network details or client IP addresses.
Key opinions
- Filtering utility: Experts confirm that the header, when trusted, has been historically used in filtering decisions by major email providers like AOL and Hotmail to manage email from their customers based on their assigned IP addresses.
- Reputation enhancement: The header can, in some contexts, be used positively to improve the reputation of mail originating from a shared IP address.
- No deliverability harm in removal: A consensus among experts is that removing the X-Originating-IP header generally has no negative influence on deliverability.
- Privacy and security risks: The main drawback of this header is its potential to expose sensitive information, such as corporate IP addresses or even employees' home IP addresses.
- Received headers: While X-Originating-IP can be removed, it is generally frowned upon to remove standard Received headers, as they are crucial for mail flow diagnostics and abuse tracing.
Key considerations
- Distinguishing headers: It's important to differentiate between the non-standard X-Originating-IP and essential, standard headers like Received (which are part of the mail routing history).
- Filtering logic: Understanding that filters will process emails regardless of minor header modifications, focusing on content, authentication, and sender reputation is more effective for deliverability. This is related to how email filters work.
- Internal system compatibility: Before removing headers, especially internal Received or other X-headers, verify that doing so will not disrupt any internal mail server functionalities, such as bounce processing or logging.
- Security priority: If the header exposes internal network topology or sensitive IP information, its removal for security reasons is often a justified action, as per security best practices outlined in various forensic and security guides.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that the X-Originating-IP header, when reliable, is indeed utilized in filtering decisions. It was historically implemented by major providers like AOL and Hotmail to selectively block or manage their customers based on their assigned dial-up IP addresses, indicating its role in reputation management for ISPs.
Expert view
Expert from DuoCircle states that tracing back emails to their source IP addresses is crucial for identifying various forms of abuse, including scams, spam, phishing, and spoofing emails. This process links back to potentially fraudulent senders, highlighting the importance of IP information (whether from standard or extended headers) for security investigations.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and technical analyses highlight the dual nature of headers like X-Originating-IP. While they can be valuable for forensic investigations and understanding email routing, they are not standardized and can pose security and privacy risks by revealing too much information about the sender's infrastructure. The general advice often leans towards careful consideration before including or removing such non-essential headers.
Key findings
- Tracing aid: Documentation often points out that X-Originating-IP can help in pinpointing the actual source of a message, which is useful for forensic analysis and combating spam.
- Privacy and spoofing risks: Alongside its utility, documentation frequently warns about the header's flaws, including its susceptibility to spoofing and the privacy implications of exposing the originating IP address.
- Informative for routing: Email headers, in general, are highlighted as providing crucial information about a message's source, its routing path through various servers, and how it was delivered.
- Distinction from trusted IP: Technical documentation sometimes clarifies that X-Originating-IP is not the same as the originating IP in forensic terms, which refers to the first 100% trusted IP in the headers.
Key considerations
- Non-standard nature: Remember that X-Originating-IP is a non-standard header. Its presence and interpretation can vary across different mail systems, unlike standard headers defined in RFCs.
- Configuration control: Mail server documentation (e.g., Exchange, Zimbra) often provides instructions on how to manage or remove certain headers, giving administrators control over what information is exposed.
- Security vs. transparency: The decision to include or remove such headers involves a trade-off between the desire for transparency (for forensic analysis) and the need for security and privacy protection.
- Comprehensive header analysis: When troubleshooting deliverability or security issues, it's essential to perform a comprehensive analysis of all email headers, not just X-Originating-IP, to understand the full message path and any potential issues.
Technical article
Documentation from Mutant Mail Blog explains that while the X-Originating-IP header is helpful for pinpointing message sources, it also carries inherent flaws such as spoofing risks and privacy concerns. This indicates a cautious approach should be taken regarding its use and exposure.
Technical article
Documentation from Practical 365 provides guidance on how to remove IP addresses, including X-Originating-IP, from email headers using mailflow rules in Exchange Admin Center (EAC). This indicates that such removal is technically feasible and an option for administrators.
Related resources
10 resources
Related pages
What is the utility of X-Originating IP in email headers?
Does x-originating-ip impact email deliverability?
Should my origination IP and outbound IP be the same when sending email?
How do personalization errors in email headers impact deliverability?
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
How email blacklists actually work: a simple guide
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
Boost Email Deliverability Rates: Technical Solutions from Top Performing Senders
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
What is header.i in email headers, how does it relate to DKIM, and does it affect sender reputation?
