Emailing DNS records is generally safe because these records are inherently public information. They are designed to be discoverable by anyone on the internet to facilitate services like email delivery and website hosting. The critical distinction lies between the DNS records themselves (e.g., SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MX records) and sensitive access credentials for your DNS hosting provider. While records are public, credentials must remain private.
Key findings
Public accessibility: DNS records are by design publicly available and discoverable via various online tools. Sharing them does not expose new, sensitive information.
Purpose of records: DNS records, such as SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, are crucial for email authentication and deliverability, ensuring emails reach their intended recipients securely.
No direct risk: Possessing a domain's DNS records does not grant an attacker the ability to use the domain for their own purposes, such as sending emails or hosting websites. That requires access to the domain's DNS hosting account.
Headers provide info: Much of the relevant DNS information for email can be found by examining the headers of any email sent from that domain.
Key considerations
Credentials vs. records: Never email DNS hosting credentials (usernames, passwords) or private keys (e.g., DKIM private keys). These are highly sensitive and must be kept secure.
Data exposure: While DNS records themselves are public, sending them via email (especially unencrypted) could expose them if the email account is compromised. However, this is largely redundant given their public nature.
SPF record length: Be mindful of SPF record limitations, particularly the 10-lookup limit, which can impact deliverability if not properly managed.
Email marketers frequently interact with DNS records to ensure their campaigns reach the inbox. Their perspectives often focus on the practical implications for deliverability and the separation of public records from private access data. While they understand the public nature of these records, some exercise caution regarding how this information is handled, especially when sharing it with third parties.
Key opinions
Public information: Many marketers acknowledge that DNS records are publicly accessible, reducing the security risk of emailing them.
Separation of concerns: Marketers understand the clear difference between sharing DNS record values and sharing sensitive DNS hosting credentials.
Trust and diligence: Projects involving DNS changes require due diligence to ensure no unintended security vulnerabilities arise, even if the records themselves are public.
Key considerations
Risk mitigation: While the records are public, any information transmitted via email could theoretically be intercepted. This reinforces the need for secure email practices in general, especially when sharing any technical details.
Domain reputation: The proper configuration of DNS records, particularly SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, directly impacts domain reputation and prevents issues like spoofing. This is where the real security value lies.
Avoiding credentials: It is critical for marketers and anyone handling domain settings to understand that DNS records are not credentials, and the latter should never be emailed.
Subdomain management: When using subdomains for email sending, marketers need to ensure the correct DNS records are in place for each subdomain to maintain deliverability and authentication.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests that their primary concern was someone forwarding the email to a personal account and then using the domain for their own purposes, highlighting a valid due diligence consideration for any project involving domain settings.
12 Feb 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from MailerSend explains that DNS records are vital for secure and reliable email delivery, often including advanced tracking options. They emphasize that proper configuration is key to maintaining trust and inbox placement.
15 Jan 2024 - MailerSend
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability and security universally agree on the public nature of DNS records. Their emphasis is on distinguishing these public records from the highly sensitive credentials required to modify them. They often highlight that while records can be shared, the true security concern lies with unauthorized access to the DNS management interface.
Key opinions
Open by design: DNS records are inherently public and must be published to function, making emailing them largely benign.
No risk of misuse: Simply possessing DNS records, even through an intercepted email, does not grant a malicious actor the ability to spoof a domain or use it illicitly.
Credentials are key: The only truly sensitive information is the login credentials for the DNS hosting provider, which enable modification of records.
Private key caution: While most DNS records are public, a DKIM private key is an exception and should never be emailed or shared insecurely.
Key considerations
Domain control: Domain's DNS host access should be extremely closely guarded, as it is the gateway to controlling a domain's online presence, including email.
Email chain exploitation: Although records are public, sending them via email might seem to 'make it easier' for a malicious actor if they could exploit the email chain itself, but this is a low-probability risk compared to other methods of obtaining public DNS data.
MX record importance: Experts underline the crucial role of MX records in ensuring emails are delivered to the correct recipients.
Reverse DNS: Beyond standard records, experts also advise on the importance of reverse DNS resolution (PTR records) for maintaining strong email deliverability.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks confirms that DNS records are inherently publicly available and must be published, underscoring that their visibility is fundamental to the internet's operation.
12 Feb 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource highlights that DNS records, specifically SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, are essential for email security, helping to prevent spoofing and ensure legitimate email delivery.
20 Jun 2023 - SpamResource
What the documentation says
Technical documentation on DNS records consistently focuses on their functional roles in enabling internet services, including email. These resources detail the various types of records (e.g., MX, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, TXT) and their specific purposes in routing, authenticating, and securing email communication. They underline that these records are public configurations essential for proper system interoperability, rather than confidential data.
Key findings
Authentication standards: Documentation emphasizes that SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are standards for email authentication, verifying sender legitimacy and preventing spoofing.
Mail exchange: MX (Mail Exchange) records are critical for directing incoming emails to the correct mail server for a domain.
Deliverability: Proper DNS configuration, as outlined in documentation, directly impacts email deliverability, ensuring messages reach the inbox.
Record placement: Documentation specifies where various DNS records should be placed within a domain's DNS settings for optimal functionality.
Absence of records: Without the necessary DNS records, documentation warns that emails are far less likely to be delivered, or may even be rejected outright.
Domain vs. subdomains: Documentation often provides specific guidance for configuring DNS records for both root domains and subdomains used for email sending.
Authentication changes: Recent updates in email authentication standards (e.g., by Google and Yahoo) necessitate the proper setup of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC for any domain sending email.
Technical article
Documentation from DNS Made Easy explains that implementing DNS records ensures the smooth flow of email communication and enhances security by safeguarding against spam.
10 May 2024 - DNS Made Easy
Technical article
Documentation from Pressable confirms that recent changes require domains to have SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records in place if they are used for sending email, highlighting a mandatory update for senders.