Summary
Including compensation amounts, such as '$200', in survey email subject lines or body content is unlikely to directly trigger spam filters when certain conditions are met. Modern spam filters (or blocklists) have evolved beyond simple keyword matching and now heavily prioritize sender reputation and recipient engagement. While older systems might have flagged such terms as 'spam trigger words', today's sophisticated algorithms assess the overall context of the email, the sender's history, and the recipient's interaction with past communications. A strong relationship with your audience and a history of positive engagement are far more critical for inbox placement than the presence of monetary values in your subject line.
Key findings
- Reputation matters: Sender reputation and audience engagement are more significant factors for deliverability than specific keywords in the subject line or body. A good reputation indicates to mailbox providers that you are a legitimate sender.
- Engagement is key: If recipients have an existing relationship with you (e.g., opted-in, recently engaged with emails), including a compensation offer is less likely to cause issues. High engagement signals relevance and trustworthiness.
- Old rules vs. new rules: The impact of specific spam trigger words has decreased over time. Modern spam filters are more contextual and behavioral.
- Higher open rates: Including compensation in the subject line can actually lead to significantly higher open rates, as it provides a clear incentive for the recipient to engage.
Key considerations
- Audience relationship: Always consider your existing relationship with the recipients. For cold lists or inactive segments, any perceived 'promotional' language, including compensation, might carry higher risk.
- List quality: A clean, opted-in list with recent engagement is crucial. If your list quality is poor, compensation offers could exacerbate deliverability problems.
- Testing: A/B test subject lines with and without the compensation amount to observe the impact on open rates and deliverability for your specific audience. This provides real-world data relevant to your sending practices.
- Holistic deliverability: Focus on overall email health, including proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), consistent sending volume, and relevant content. A single keyword, even one like a compensation amount, is rarely the sole reason for emails going to spam when other factors are optimized. Mailchimp's resources on spam triggers emphasize this holistic view.
What email marketers say
Email marketers generally agree that including compensation amounts in survey email subject lines or bodies is not a significant spam trigger, especially when sending to an engaged audience. Many have experienced success with this tactic, observing increased open rates without negative impacts on deliverability. The consensus points towards sender reputation and list engagement as far more critical factors than the mere presence of monetary figures.
Key opinions
- No noticeable impact: Many marketers have run tests and successfully included compensation offers in subject lines without observing a negative effect on deliverability.
- Higher open rates: The primary benefit noted is a significant increase in email open rates when the compensation amount is clearly stated.
- Relationship is key: The importance of an existing relationship with recipients is frequently highlighted. If your audience is engaged, mentioning compensation is less risky.
- Context over keywords: Spam filters are sophisticated and consider context. An offer to an engaged, opted-in list is seen differently than an unsolicited offer to a cold list.
Key considerations
- Audience targeting: Marketers recommend targeting users who have recently engaged with your emails (e.g., clicked within the last 3 months) to maximize positive impact and minimize deliverability risk.
- Subject line placement: While some debate if the subject line or body is less 'triggering', practical experience suggests subject line inclusion is fine, particularly due to its positive effect on open rates.
- Small audience implication: This strategy is often used for smaller, more targeted audiences, which inherently carry less risk than mass sends.
- Avoid other spam triggers: Even with a compelling offer, ensure other elements of your email (e.g., excessive punctuation, all caps) do not trigger filters. For example, check out these tips for survey email subject lines that emphasize avoiding common pitfalls.
- Monitor performance: Continuously monitor your deliverability metrics. If you notice a drop in inbox placement, review all aspects of your campaign, not just the compensation mention. Tools can help you determine if marketing emails are going to spam.
Marketer from Email Geeks suggests that their team did something similar and it didn't seem to have any impact on deliverability. Their experience indicates that sender reputation and audience engagement are far more influential factors than specific spam trigger words.
Marketer from Email Geeks suggests that testing is crucial. They found that mentioning the money offering led to higher open rates and did not negatively affect deliverability. This was particularly true for lists with recent user engagement.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts generally concur that for an engaged and known audience, including a compensation amount in a survey email's subject line or body is unlikely to be a primary spam trigger. They emphasize that the recipient's relationship with the sender and recent engagement are far more influential factors than keyword analysis by spam filters. While caution is always advised, particularly with cold lists, the benefit of increased open rates for incentivized surveys often outweighs the minimal risk for good lists.
Key opinions
- Relationship over content: Experts agree that the sender's relationship with recipients is paramount. If recipients have opted in and actively engaged, specific content like compensation amounts is rarely an issue.
- Evolving filters: Spam filters have become highly sophisticated, moving beyond simple keyword matching to focus on behavioral patterns, sender reputation, and engagement signals. Therefore, old 'spam word' rules are less relevant.
- Compelling offer: A compelling offer like cash compensation can significantly boost open rates, making it a viable strategy for engaged audiences.
- Content placement: Whether in the subject line or body, the general consensus is that for good lists, the specific placement of the compensation amount is less critical than the overall sender context.
Key considerations
- List hygiene: It's critical to ensure your list is clean and consists of genuinely interested recipients. An old or cold list, regardless of content, poses a higher risk of deliverability issues.
- Spamassassin checks: While unlikely to be a major issue, running content through a SpamAssassin checker can provide reassurance, as it's known for having some weird false positives in its metarules.
- Overall sender health: A robust sender reputation, maintained through consistent positive engagement, proper authentication, and minimal spam complaints, is the best defense against blocklists and ensures good deliverability.
- Perception matters: Although direct spam triggering is unlikely, if the email feels like an unsolicited commercial message rather than a genuine survey, it can still lead to user complaints, which negatively impact reputation.
Expert from Email Geeks suggests that the recipient's relationship with the sender is paramount. If recipients have an existing relationship and have recently engaged with emails, mentioning cash in the subject line will not harm deliverability. In fact, it could serve as a compelling offer.
Expert from Email Geeks notes that the emphasis on subject lines and keywords as major spam triggers has significantly decreased over time. Modern filters are more nuanced, focusing on overall sender behavior and recipient engagement rather than isolated words.
What the documentation says
Email deliverability documentation from various sources indicates a shift in how spam filters operate. While historically some words were 'trigger words,' modern systems prioritize sender reputation, authentication, and user engagement. They often evaluate the overall intent and context of an email. Documentation suggests that misleading subject lines and overly aggressive sales language are more likely to raise red flags than a clear, incentivized offer to an already engaged audience. The emphasis is now on building trust and demonstrating legitimate sending practices.
Key findings
- Sophisticated filtering: Email service providers (ESPs) and mailbox providers use complex algorithms that analyze multiple factors, including sender reputation, IP reputation, content, and user engagement metrics, not just individual keywords.
- Contextual analysis: Filters assess the context of the email. A compensation offer within a legitimate survey from a trusted sender is treated differently than a similar offer from a suspicious or unknown sender.
- Misleading subject lines: Documentation often warns against misleading subject lines or deceptive practices, which are far more damaging than direct communication about incentives.
- Behavioral signals: Positive interactions like opens, clicks, and replies improve sender reputation, while negative signals like spam complaints or unsubscribes hurt it. These user behaviors are heavily weighted.
Key considerations
- Sender reputation management: Maintaining a high sender reputation by ensuring proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) and managing clean lists is critical. This forms the foundation for good deliverability, regardless of specific content. For a deeper dive, check out our guide on understanding your email domain reputation.
- Compliance: Adhere to anti-spam laws like CAN-SPAM. While compensation offers are not inherently non-compliant, deceptive practices or sending to unconsenting recipients are. Understanding what constitutes spam is vital.
- Content quality: Beyond subject lines, the overall quality and relevance of the email content play a significant role. Avoid excessive images, broken links, or overly promotional language in non-transactional emails unless appropriate for your audience.
- Monitoring spam scores: Utilize tools that provide insights into how your emails are scored by spam filters. This allows for proactive adjustments if any issues arise. EngageBay offers insights on spam words and their impact, emphasizing that misleading subject lines increase spam scores.
Documentation from Mailchimp explains that spam filters analyze a wide range of factors beyond just individual words, including sender reputation, content formatting, and recipient engagement. This holistic approach means that a single word or phrase is rarely the sole reason for an email being flagged as spam.
Documentation from EngageBay states that misleading email subject lines can increase spam scores and erode trust with your audience. This suggests that transparency, even about compensation, is generally better than trying to obscure the offer.
![30+ effective survey email subject lines [+ examples & tips]](https://moosend.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Effective-Survey-Email-Subject-Lines.png)
