Summary
Establishing a precise 'safe' delivery rate threshold can be complex, as true email deliverability goes beyond mere acceptance by a mail server. While a high delivery rate (emails accepted vs. emails sent) is generally desirable, it doesn't guarantee inbox placement. Factors like spam complaints, bounces, and engagement metrics are crucial indicators of sender reputation and overall email health. A consistently high delivery rate, often in the high 90s, is a strong foundation, but a holistic view of all deliverability metrics is essential to understand email program performance and ensure messages reach the inbox, not just a server.
Key findings
- Holistic view: Relying solely on a delivery rate (messages accepted / messages sent) is a flawed approach because emails can be accepted by the server but still land in the spam folder.
- Desired delivery rate: A strong and healthy email campaign should aim for close to 99% of emails being accepted by email servers and not bounced.
- Spam complaint rate: The spam complaint rate should ideally be below 0.1%. Going above 0.3% is a critical threshold to avoid, as it indicates significant deliverability issues that can lead to throttling or blocking.
- Hard bounce rate: Aim for a hard bounce rate (permanent errors) of 0%, or at least below 0.5%. Exceeding 3% indicates serious list hygiene problems.
- Inbox placement matters: Even with a high delivery rate, if emails are going to the spam folder, true deliverability is compromised.
Key considerations
- Metric definitions: Understand how your Email Service Provider (ESP) calculates 'delivery rate', as definitions can vary (e.g., accepted first time, accepted eventually, delayed bounces). Exporting raw data and applying your own formulas can provide clearer insights.
- Bounce log analysis: Regularly review bounce error logs. They often provide specific reasons for rejections or temporary failures, which can help in troubleshooting. Consider what is a reasonable soft bounce tolerance for your campaigns.
- Spam complaint feedback loops: Spam complaints (via Feedback Loops or FBLs) lead to automatic unsubscribes, which is beneficial. Monitor the percentage, but also identify which mailbox providers are generating the most complaints.
- Gmail anomaly: For Gmail-heavy lists, a very low spam complaint rate might be misleading. If emails are going directly to bulk or spam, users cannot easily complain, artificially lowering the reported complaint rate. Consider adjusting your complaint rate calculation by excluding Gmail addresses for a more accurate picture, or focus on other metrics like those found in Google Postmaster Tools.
- Business strategy impact: Your business model (e.g., quantity vs. quality of leads, regional opt-in laws) can inherently affect delivery rates. Understand how email deliverability works in your specific context.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often find themselves grappling with fluctuating delivery rates and the challenge of identifying what truly constitutes a 'safe' threshold. While a numerical percentage provides a quick snapshot, the consensus among marketers is that this figure alone is insufficient. Real deliverability means reaching the inbox, not just getting past the initial server gate. They emphasize the need to look at a broader set of metrics including bounces, spam complaints, and even engagement to diagnose issues effectively. The sentiment is that a high delivery rate is a baseline, but the nuances of recipient engagement and feedback loops truly define the health of an email program.
Key opinions
- Beyond the metric: Many marketers acknowledge that simply tracking a delivery rate percentage on its own isn't enough; it's vital to consider other factors like spam complaints and bounces.
- 99% target: An ideal target for emails accepted by servers, without bounces, is around 99% for a healthy campaign.
- Concern at 96-97%: A drop from 99% to 96-97% delivery rate, even if bounces and spam rates remain low, can be a cause for concern and warrants investigation.
- Low spam complaints: While generally a good sign, very low spam complaints can sometimes be a red flag, especially if mail is being filtered to the spam folder before recipients have a chance to complain.
- Data accuracy: ESPs might calculate metrics differently, so understanding their methodology is key to interpreting data correctly.
Key considerations
- Investigate drops: If delivery rates decrease, marketers should immediately look into the reasons for the change, starting with bounce logs and database hygiene.
- Database cleanup: Regularly deleting hard bounces and invalid addresses is a proactive step to improve deliverability.
- Contextual analysis: Consider your business strategy and audience. A global company with varying opt-in laws across regions will naturally see different deliverability rates.
- Proactive monitoring: Even if current metrics seem fine, continuously monitor and understand underlying factors that might affect deliverability in the future, such as engagement thresholds.
Email marketer from Email Geeks indicates that they are looking at delivery rate metrics provided by their ESP, and while they monitor bounces and spam rate, the delivery rate has decreased lately, prompting their question about safe thresholds.
Email marketer from CampaignHQ Blog explains that industry standards suggest an email deliverability rate should hit at least 85%, with an ideal target between 98-99%. This highlights a range of acceptable rates but also aims for excellence.
What the experts say
Experts universally agree that email deliverability is a multifaceted issue that cannot be distilled into a single 'safe' delivery rate percentage. While a high SMTP acceptance rate is a good starting point, it fails to account for crucial factors like inbox placement and recipient engagement. They emphasize the need for a comprehensive approach, continuously monitoring spam complaint rates, hard bounce rates, and diligently analyzing bounce logs. The consensus is that understanding the nuances of how ESPs calculate metrics and proactively managing list health are far more critical than chasing an arbitrary delivery percentage.
Key opinions
- Delivery rate limitations: A high 'delivery rate' (messages accepted / messages sent) doesn't guarantee inbox placement, as emails can still go to spam after being accepted by the SMTP server. It's a flawed approach to rely on this metric alone.
- Comprehensive monitoring: At a minimum, you must continuously monitor complaints and bounces. Being able to measure conversations or engagements is also very useful.
- Hard bounce rate target: The objective for hard bounce rate (permanent errors like non-existent email addresses) is 0%, though below 0.5% can be considered normal depending on context. Anything above 3% requires immediate investigation.
- Spam complaint threshold: A rule of thumb for spam complaints is to keep them lower than 0.1%. Going beyond 0.3% is a critical issue that can severely impact deliverability.
- Gmail complaint caveats: Low spam complaints from a predominantly Gmail list can be meaningless and should be ignored, as emails might be going to the bulk folder, preventing users from complaining.
Key considerations
- Define metrics internally: Organizations should define their own calculation methods for delivery, complaints, and bounce metrics, as ESPs' definitions can be opaque and change. This empowers accurate internal reporting and troubleshooting.
- Analyze bounce logs: Carefully review bounce error logs, especially for 'soft bounces' (temporary issues), as they often contain specific problem statements and URLs for further information. This detailed analysis can uncover solvable issues.
- Identify complaint sources: While spam complaints are auto-unsubscribed, it's beneficial to analyze which mailbox providers are generating these complaints to identify potential reputation issues with specific ISPs.
- Adjusting complaint rates: For a more accurate representation of complaint rates, especially with mixed lists, consider removing all Gmail addresses from the total denominator before calculating the rate. This helps to overcome the Gmail complaint reporting anomaly.
- Preventive measures: Regularly cleaning up databases by removing hard bounces and invalid addresses is a fundamental practice for maintaining good deliverability. See our guide on soft bounce tolerance.
Deliverability expert from Email Geeks explains that relying on a single 'delivery rate' metric is a flawed approach because emails can be accepted at the SMTP level yet still go to spam, emphasizing the need to monitor bounces and complaints.
Deliverability expert from WP Mail SMTP asserts that maintaining a spam complaint rate below 0.1% is crucial for optimal deliverability, with 0.3% being the absolute maximum to stay under. Exceeding this limit significantly jeopardizes inbox placement.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and industry reports indicate that while a high delivery rate is foundational, it's the combination of low complaint rates and minimal bounces that truly signifies good email deliverability. Major mailbox providers like Google and Yahoo have recently reinforced stricter thresholds, making it imperative for senders to not only achieve high delivery percentages but also maintain low spam rates. The emphasis is shifting from mere server acceptance to actual inbox placement, demanding a more nuanced understanding and adherence to best practices, including robust authentication and list hygiene.
Key findings
- High delivery target: A general consensus points to a target delivery rate of 95% or higher for optimal performance and to meet new sender requirements.
- Spam complaint threshold: It is critical to keep spam complaints below 0.1%, with a hard limit of 0.3% to avoid significant deliverability penalties from major ISPs like Google and Yahoo.
- Bounce rate limits: Combined hard and soft bounce rates should ideally not exceed 3%.
- Authentication requirements: Proper email authentication using SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is fundamental for achieving good deliverability and meeting modern ISP requirements.
Key considerations
- Inbox placement vs. delivery: Documentation often clarifies that a high delivery rate (meaning acceptance by the receiving server) does not automatically equate to good inbox placement. Focus should be on reaching the inbox.
- Engagement signals: Beyond technical metrics, mailbox providers increasingly use engagement signals (opens, clicks, replies) as indicators of sender reputation. Low engagement can lead to filtering even with good delivery rates.
- List hygiene: Regular use of email verification services and active management of inactive subscribers are crucial for maintaining a healthy list and reducing bounce rates.
- Compliance with new rules: New guidelines from major mailbox providers emphasize strict adherence to spam complaint thresholds and authentication protocols, highlighting these as critical for all bulk senders. Learn understanding spam rate thresholds.
- Continuous monitoring: Deliverability is dynamic; continuous monitoring of key metrics and adapting strategies based on provider feedback (e.g., via FBLs) is essential. For more, see what is a good email deliverability rate or benchmark.
Documentation from Mailgun states that senders should strive to keep spam complaints below 0.1% and avoid any spikes that reach a 0.3% threshold. It also stresses the importance of authenticating emails with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC with at least a p=none policy to ensure deliverability.
Documentation from Omeda specifies that if a sender's spam rates are above 0.3%, their email delivery rate will fall below 95%. It strongly advises using an email verification service to ensure all email addresses on a list are valid and reduce bounce rates.
.png)
