Summary
The choice of your email sending tool can certainly influence your email deliverability, though its impact has evolved. While factors like your email list hygiene and content quality remain paramount, the underlying infrastructure, sending practices, and reputation management of your chosen tool (or email service provider, ESP) also play a role. Modern ESPs generally provide a more robust and compliant sending environment than in the past, but subtle differences in their shared IP pools, rate limiting, and technical configurations can still affect where your emails land.
Key findings
- IP reputation: The reputation of the IP addresses used by your email tool is crucial. If the tool (or ESP) allows other users to send spam from shared IPs, it can negatively impact your deliverability, potentially leading to your emails being blocked or landing in spam folders.
- Shared vs. dedicated IPs: Many tools use shared IP pools. While this can be beneficial for warming up new senders, a poor sender on a shared IP can harm the deliverability for everyone on that IP. Dedicated IPs offer more control but require consistent high-volume, reputable sending to maintain a good reputation.
- Technical configurations: The tool's proper implementation of authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is fundamental. A misconfigured tool can lead to authentication failures, impacting your sender reputation.
- Platform sending practices: The overall sending practices enforced by your email tool can influence your deliverability. ESPs with stricter policies against spam and abuse tend to maintain a better collective reputation, which benefits all their users.
- Tracking features: Certain tracking pixels or link wrappers, while common, can sometimes be flagged by spam filters. While tracking pixels rarely are the sole culprit, it's an element of the tool's implementation that can have a minor effect.
Key considerations
- Focus on fundamentals: While the tool has an impact, factors like list hygiene, engaging content, and sender reputation management typically have a much larger influence on deliverability. Prioritize these core elements over the marginal differences between reputable tools.
- Monitor your sender reputation: Regardless of your tool, consistently monitor your sender reputation. Tools like Google Postmaster Tools provide insights into how mailbox providers view your sending practices.
- Understand your tool's infrastructure: Familiarize yourself with how your chosen email tool manages IPs, handles bounce rates, and ensures compliance. A reputable email service provider (ESP) will prioritize strong deliverability for their clients.
- Evaluate deliverability benchmarks: Some independent tests compare deliverability rates across different email service providers, which can offer a general idea of how various tools perform.
- Consider your sending volume and history: If you are migrating to a new tool, your existing sender reputation will need to be re-established with the new platform's IPs. This period of IP warming is critical.
What email marketers say
Email marketers generally acknowledge that while the email sending tool itself is a factor in deliverability, it's often secondary to the quality of the email list and the content of the emails. Many marketing professionals emphasize the need for a good sender reputation, which is built over time through consistent, high-quality sending practices rather than being solely dependent on the chosen platform. They observe that even subtle differences between tools, such as the collective reputation of their shared IP pools, can lead to varying delivery outcomes.
Key opinions
- List quality is primary: Many marketers agree that the quality and cleanliness of your email list have a greater impact on deliverability than the specific email tool you use, assuming the tool is reputable.
- Minor tool differences: There will always be slight variations in deliverability between different tools, influenced by their IP reputation and the aggregate traffic sent by all users on their platform.
- Sender history matters: A sender's history and established reputation on a particular platform can influence deliverability more than the tool itself. Migrating to a new tool means building a new reputation there.
- Content and engagement: Email content quality and recipient engagement are critical factors that can override the choice of sending tool. High engagement signals positive sender behavior to mailbox providers.
- Beyond delivery: Deliverability is not just about whether an email is delivered, but whether it lands in the primary inbox versus the spam folder or other tabs. The tool's capabilities in aiding this placement are important.
Key considerations
- Consistent sending behavior: Maintaining consistent sending behavior (volume, frequency, content) across different tools is crucial to observe true deliverability differences attributable to the tool itself.
- Monitoring various metrics: Marketers should track not only open and click rates but also bounce rates and spam complaint rates as direct indicators of deliverability health, regardless of the sending tool.
- Vendor reputation management: Choose an email tool that actively manages its IP reputation and takes steps to prevent abuse, which indirectly benefits your sender reputation and deliverability.
- Email content optimization: Ensure your email content is optimized to avoid spam triggers, as this is a universal factor regardless of the email tool.
- Address underlying issues: If deliverability issues persist across different tools, the problem is likely rooted in your sending practices (e.g., list acquisition, engagement strategy) rather than the tool itself. Several factors can kill your email deliverability.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes that list quality often overshadows the impact of the email tool itself. While a tool should be reputable, the recipient list's cleanliness and engagement are more crucial determinants of deliverability.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that inherent differences exist across email tools, influenced by their IP reputation and the aggregated traffic from other users. These factors contribute to variations in deliverability outcomes, although this impact is generally less significant than in the past.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts highlight that while email tools provide the necessary infrastructure, the nuance of their shared IP reputation and internal sending policies significantly affects inbox placement. They often point out that even within the same email service provider, different IP addresses can yield vastly different deliverability results due to statistical variations and the behavior of other senders sharing those IPs. Experts emphasize that a tool's impact is subtle and often intertwined with broader reputation management and the sender's own history.
Key opinions
- Statistical anomalies: Experts acknowledge that sometimes deliverability can vary wildly between two different IP addresses from the same ESP, which can be attributed to statistical probabilities and the behavior of other senders.
- Sender reputation is key: The sender reputation score, calculated by inbox providers based on various metrics, is a primary determinant of inbox placement. A good email tool facilitates building this reputation, but it's ultimately tied to sender behavior.
- Beyond delivery to placement: Deliverability is not merely about email delivery but also about ensuring the email lands in the primary inbox, not spam or other folders. A good tool helps with this distinction.
- Importance of authentication: Email tools must properly implement authentication protocols like DMARC, SPF, and DKIM. Their correct configuration by the tool's infrastructure is vital for sender trust.
- Content analysis capabilities: Some tools offer features to analyze email content for potential spam triggers, helping senders optimize their messages before sending.
Key considerations
- Monitoring IP reputation: Experts recommend consistently checking your IP and domain reputation. Tools can influence this, but consistent monitoring and remediation are your responsibility.
- Understanding blocklist impact: If the IPs your tool uses end up on a public blacklist or blocklist, it will severely affect your deliverability. Ensure your tool has strong policies against abuse.
- Technical compliance: Ensure your email tool adheres to current email standards and technical requirements set by mailbox providers, as these frequently evolve.
- Shared responsibility: While an email tool provides the platform, senders must take responsibility for their list hygiene, content quality, and engagement practices to maintain good deliverability. Understanding how sender reputation is calculated is essential.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks indicates that statistical anomalies can occasionally lead to erratic delivery outcomes, even when comparing two different IP addresses managed by the same email service provider. This suggests that even with a good tool, variations can occur.
Expert view
Expert from Spamresource.com emphasizes that your sender reputation is fundamentally tied to how mailbox providers perceive your sending behavior, not just the tool. A tool provides the means, but your adherence to best practices is paramount.
What the documentation says
Official documentation from various email service providers and industry bodies consistently underlines the technical requirements for optimal email deliverability, emphasizing authentication, sender reputation, and adherence to messaging standards. While these documents rarely single out specific 'tools,' they implicitly highlight that any email sending mechanism must support these fundamental protocols and best practices to ensure messages reach their intended inboxes. The documentation suggests that an email tool's effect is largely derived from its ability to facilitate adherence to these established technical guidelines and its internal policies for managing sending infrastructure.
Key findings
- Authentication standards: Documentation frequently emphasizes the necessity of properly configured SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records. Your email tool must support and correctly implement these protocols for email to be authenticated by recipient servers.
- Sender reputation management: Mailbox provider documentation (e.g., Google Postmaster Tools) outlines how sender reputation is scored based on factors like spam complaints, IP history, and domain age. An email tool should ideally facilitate the maintenance of a positive reputation.
- Content guidelines: Documentation often provides guidelines on email content, including avoiding spammy words, maintaining a good text-to-image ratio, and ensuring proper HTML. While your tool doesn't write your content, it should allow for compliance with these guidelines.
- Compliance with anti-spam laws: Documentation from legal and industry bodies (e.g., CAN-SPAM, GDPR) stresses the importance of consent, clear opt-out mechanisms, and accurate sender information. Reputable email tools provide features to help users comply with these regulations.
- Bounce and feedback loop handling: Official deliverability guides suggest that email tools should effectively process bounces and feedback loops (FBLs) to ensure lists are kept clean and to promptly identify potential issues.
Key considerations
- Tool's adherence to standards: When choosing an email tool, verify that it fully supports and encourages the implementation of all recommended email authentication protocols and technical standards.
- Reporting and analytics: Ensure your email tool provides comprehensive reporting on deliverability metrics, including bounce rates, complaint rates, and open rates, as suggested by various deliverability best practices documentation.
- Scalability and infrastructure: Official documentation implies that an email tool's underlying infrastructure should be robust enough to handle sending volumes without causing delays or performance issues that could negatively impact deliverability.
- Security features: An email tool's security features, such as TLS encryption for email transmission, are also outlined in technical documentation as important for maintaining trust and deliverability.
Technical article
Documentation from Klaviyo Help Center defines email deliverability as the successful placement of an email into the recipient's mail server. It implies that a reliable email tool ensures this initial delivery, setting the stage for further inbox placement.
Technical article
Documentation from EmailLabs.io distinguishes between delivery and deliverability, stating that deliverability specifically answers whether an email landed in the primary inbox. An effective email tool must aid in achieving this crucial 'inbox placement' rather than just 'delivery'.
Related resources
12 resources
Related pages
How does email deliverability work in the current email marketing landscape?
How do email sending practices impact domain reputation and deliverability?
How does email code quality and size impact email deliverability?
Why has my email deliverability dropped significantly, despite a low spam rate and bounce rate, and what steps can I take to resolve it?
How email blacklists actually work: a simple guide
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
Why Your Emails Fail: Expert Guide to Improve Email Deliverability [2025]
Boost Email Deliverability Rates: Technical Solutions from Top Performing Senders
How to Run an Email Deliverability Test: A Proven Checklist
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
