Spam bot clicks are a growing concern for email marketers, often inflating click-through rates and distorting engagement data. These automated interactions, originating from security filters or malicious scripts, can make it challenging to accurately assess campaign performance and maintain a healthy sender reputation. Identifying these clicks is crucial for reliable reporting and effective email strategy.
Key findings
Excessive clicks: Bots frequently click on specific links, like logos, multiple times within a short period, often on just one or a few links in the email rather than all links.
Coexistence: Bot clicks and genuine human engagement can occur from the same email address, making differentiation complex.
Security filters: Many bot clicks originate from security filters and anti-spam scanners, even from reputable providers like Gmail for business-to-business emails.
Honeypot limitations: Traditional honeypots may not always catch these advanced bot clicks, especially if they focus on common link patterns.
Key considerations
Raw data analysis: Request raw click data from your email service provider (ESP) to analyze user-agent strings, IP addresses, and click timing for patterns. This helps in identifying artificial email clicks.
Holistic engagement: Do not solely rely on click metrics; consider other engagement signals like purchases, form fills, or website activity for a more accurate picture.
Deliverability impact: While bot clicks themselves do not directly harm deliverability unless they find malicious content, they can indirectly affect it by misrepresenting engagement signals to ISPs.
Monitor IP addresses: Keep an eye on the IP addresses associated with email opens and clicks. Look for suspicious patterns, such as multiple interactions from the same IP, which can indicate automated activity.
What email marketers say
Email marketers frequently face the dilemma of distinguishing genuine subscriber interest from automated bot activity, which can significantly skew campaign metrics. The challenge lies in accurately interpreting engagement data while ensuring that valid customer contacts are not inadvertently suppressed. Marketers often express frustration over the lack of precise tools and data from their service providers to effectively manage this issue.
Key opinions
Data distortion: Many marketers report that bot clicks lead to a significant overstatement of click rates, sometimes accounting for 20% or more of total clicks, which distorts true engagement.
List management dilemma: There is a hesitation to remove email addresses showing bot-like behavior, especially if they are associated with actual customer records.
ESP support gaps: Marketers often find their ESPs lack robust built-in bot filtering or the ability to provide detailed raw data needed for manual identification.
Automation impact: Inflated click metrics can incorrectly trigger marketing automation sequences, leading to sending more emails to unengaged 'bot' profiles and potentially harming sender reputation.
Annoyance vs. cost: For some, the primary impact is the annoyance of inaccurate data, while for others, especially those heavily reliant on click metrics, the distortion is a major concern.
Key considerations
Manual outreach: Consider a direct, perhaps humorous, outreach to suspicious contacts to ascertain if they are legitimate or bot-affected, particularly for small volumes of suspicious activity.
Beyond clicks: Prioritize webform fills, purchases, or other downstream conversions as stronger indicators of engagement than clicks alone. This aligns with approaches for identifying and handling suspicious bot clicks.
Permission-based marketing: Reiterate the importance of clear, explicit permission to send emails to ensure a genuinely engaged list, mitigating some bot click issues.
Advanced tracking: Explore tracking user behavior beyond simple email clicks, incorporating deeper web analytics to understand true interest, which can mitigate the impact of bot clicks.
Marketer from Email Geeks indicates they frequently observe excessive clicks on single links, like a company logo, which distort reporting. They note that the affected email addresses often appear legitimate, making it difficult to decide whether to remove them from lists.
23 Aug 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from MailSoar emphasizes the importance of monitoring IP addresses for email opens and clicks, advising marketers to look for unusual patterns indicative of bot activity to protect their email metrics from distortion.
15 Mar 2025 - MailSoar
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability offer nuanced insights into the nature of bot clicks, distinguishing between various types of automated interactions and their true impact on sender reputation. Their perspectives often emphasize sophisticated data analysis and strategic approaches to mitigate reporting inaccuracies, rather than just basic filtering.
Key opinions
Deliverability impact: Experts generally agree that bot clicks themselves do not directly harm deliverability unless the bots encounter malicious content, which then negatively impacts the performance at the receiving server.
Metrics over deliverability: The primary concern articulated by experts is the misleading data these clicks generate, which obscures actual subscriber engagement and makes performance analysis difficult.
ESP responsibility: Many experts suggest that ESPs should ideally handle bot filtering or, at the very least, provide raw data, including user-agent information, to allow senders to analyze and filter this activity independently.
Complex interactions: It is acknowledged that human and bot clicks can sometimes originate from the same subscriber, often due to security software on the user's end.
Accurate engagement: The main goal is to accurately determine true user engagement, as artificial clicks can lead to misinformed marketing strategies and resource allocation.
Key considerations
Fingerprinting bots: Implement methods to 'fingerprint' bot clicks by analyzing specific patterns in timing, user agents, and IP addresses to filter these events from true engagement data. For more details on this, consult how to identify and exclude automated scripts.
Permission is paramount: Reinforce the importance of strong permission-based email practices, as a truly engaged list is less susceptible to the negative repercussions of bot click distortions.
Sophisticated tracking: Move beyond basic click tracking to more advanced behavioral analysis on your website, providing a more accurate picture of engagement and a better understanding of your email domain reputation.
Data-driven decisions: Base list segmentation and sending decisions on comprehensive engagement data, rather than solely on potentially inflated click metrics.
Analyze user-agent strings: Experts recommend analyzing user-agent strings associated with clicks to identify patterns indicating non-human activity and differentiate between legitimate security scans and other bot types.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks advises that bot clicks are unlikely to harm deliverability directly unless they uncover something undesirable at the destination, which would then impact the performance at the recipient's scanning server.
23 Aug 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource states that automated scripts and security scanners are increasingly clicking links in emails, and while this distorts engagement metrics, it is often a benign process unless malicious content is found.
10 Apr 2024 - SpamResource
What the documentation says
Official documentation from email service providers and industry resources often sheds light on the nature of bot clicks, explaining their purpose, common characteristics, and providing guidance on how to manage them within reporting. This information is key to understanding the technical aspects of these automated interactions that aim to protect users from malicious content.
Key findings
Purpose of bots: Documentation frequently states that bot clicks originate from automated scripts used for security scanning, virus checking, and phishing link detection.
IP origins: Data center IPs are often associated with these bot clicks, indicating automated processes rather than individual user interactions.
Immediate click spikes: A common pattern noted in documentation is a surge of clicks occurring almost immediately after an email is sent, often before a human could realistically open and click.
User-agent analysis: Many platforms suggest examining user-agent strings to identify automated systems versus human browsers or email clients.
Discrepancy in timing: Documentation points out that a click recorded before an email is registered as 'opened' or too quickly after, is a strong indicator of bot activity.
Key considerations
Platform filtering: Utilize any 'bot filtering' or 'click fraud protection' features available within your ESP settings to automatically remove these clicks from your reported metrics. This is a common method for combating spam filter and bot clicks.
Sign-up CAPTCHAs: Implement CAPTCHAs or similar verification methods at email sign-up points to prevent bots from entering your mailing list in the first place, helping prevent future bot sign-ups.
Geographic analysis: Monitor the geographic locations associated with clicks; unusual or inconsistent locations for a segment can indicate bot activity.
Understand filter behavior: Educate yourself on how various anti-spam filters and security solutions operate, as their pre-scanning actions contribute to bot clicks.
Documentation from Klaviyo Help Center explains that to view the volume of bot clicks, users should apply a specific filter for 'Bot Click = true' when analyzing their 'Clicked Email' events within the platform's reporting interface.
05 Jan 2025 - Klaviyo Help Center
Technical article
Documentation from Mailjet advises comparing open times with click times, noting that if a user appears to 'click' a link before or immediately after opening the email, it is a strong indicator of potential bot activity and not genuine human engagement.