Anti-spam click bots significantly distort email metrics and can negatively impact deliverability. These automated interactions, often originating from security scanners or malicious actors, inflate engagement data, making it challenging for marketers to accurately assess campaign performance and segment their audience.
Key findings
Metric distortion: Bot clicks artificially inflate open and click-through rates, obscuring genuine user engagement.
Deliverability impact: While some security bots are benign, excessive or suspicious bot activity can sometimes signal low-quality traffic to internet service providers (ISPs), potentially affecting sender reputation and inbox placement.
Automation triggers: Automated clicks can trigger unwanted marketing automation sequences, leading to irrelevant content for actual subscribers.
Prevalence: Bot activity is a common and increasing challenge across all email marketing, including B2B communications.
Key considerations
Detection methods: Identifying bot clicks often involves analyzing click timestamps, IP addresses (especially data center IPs), and patterns like multiple clicks on all links within seconds. For more on this, see identifying bot clicks.
Filtering data: It is crucial to filter out bot-generated data to gain accurate insights into email campaign performance. This helps measure email engagement accurately.
Adjusting strategy: Marketers should adjust their segmentation and automation strategies to account for bot activity, focusing on genuine human interaction.
Industry perspective: Many email security systems perform automated link validation, which can generate bot clicks. More information on this can be found at Mailjet's guide on email bot clicks.
What email marketers say
Email marketers widely acknowledge anti-spam click bots as a significant challenge that skews email performance metrics. They often report difficulties in distinguishing bot clicks from genuine user engagement, which complicates campaign analysis and strategic decision-making.
Key opinions
Common issue: Bot clicks are a very common phenomenon, observed across various industries and email marketing platforms.
Data integrity: Bots compromise the integrity of email analytics, leading to inaccurate click rates and misinformed marketing decisions.
Automation impact: Beyond metrics, bot clicks can incorrectly trigger automation workflows, sending follow-up communications to non-human entities.
Difficulty in identification: While human review can sometimes spot patterns (like all links clicked simultaneously), most marketing automation platforms struggle to programmatically identify all bot activity.
Key considerations
Protecting campaigns: Marketers need to implement strategies to protect their email campaigns from the adverse effects of spam bots. This includes understanding how honeypots can filter bot clicks.
Adjusting reporting: It's essential to factor bot clicks into reporting. Marketers should learn how to filter bot clicks from reports to avoid misinterpreting campaign success.
Email marketer from Email Geeks confirms that anti-spam click bots are a real problem. They note that these bots inflate opens and clicks and even register page visits, which increasingly impacts engagement scoring metrics.
25 Oct 2021 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks suggests that bot clicks are super common. They observe that human users can often detect them when every single link in an email is clicked within the same minute, though most marketing automation platforms struggle with programmatic identification.
25 Oct 2021 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability and security view anti-spam click bots as a complex challenge, impacting not only data accuracy but also potentially influencing sender reputation. They emphasize the need for sophisticated detection mechanisms and a deeper understanding of the various types of automated interactions.
Key opinions
Security vs. spam: Many bot clicks originate from legitimate security scanners that pre-fetch links to check for malicious content, rather than being purely spam-related. However, their impact is still felt on metrics.
Reputation signals: Consistent high volumes of bot clicks, especially from unusual IP ranges, can sometimes be misinterpreted by ISPs as suspicious activity, which may indirectly affect sender reputation.
Complex identification: Differentiating between human and automated interactions requires advanced analytical capabilities, often beyond standard email service provider (ESP) reporting.
Industry resources: Organizations like M3AAWG (Messaging, Malware and Mobile Anti-Abuse Working Group) provide valuable documents and insights into non-human interactions.
Key considerations
Advanced detection: Experts recommend using multiple data points—IP addresses, user agents, click patterns, and time of click—to accurately identify bot activity. This helps prevent bot clicks hurting reputation.
Segmenting data: It is crucial to segment and analyze human-generated engagement separately from bot activity for accurate insights. For further reading, see Marketing Brew's take on data center IP bots.
Impact on deliverability: While direct negative impact on deliverability is not always clear, bot activity can obscure signals that ISPs use to evaluate sender reputation. Understanding what causes increased bot clicks and spam rates is key.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks highly recommends M3AAWG as the premier resource for documents and information on non-human interactions in email. They note that the organization provides comprehensive insights into various automated activities.
25 Oct 2021 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks expresses surprise and admiration, recognizing M3AAWG's significant role as a think tank focused on email-related issues. They acknowledge having read much of M3AAWG's material and appreciate their contributions to the industry.
26 Oct 2021 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
Technical documentation and industry standards often address the phenomenon of automated email interactions, though sometimes not explicitly under the term 'bot clicks'. They typically focus on the behaviors that can lead to false engagement data, such as URL pre-fetching by security scanners, and recommend methods for mitigating their impact on metrics and deliverability.
Key findings
Pre-fetching: Many email clients and security tools automatically 'pre-fetch' URLs within emails to scan for malware, phishing attempts, and other threats. This generates clicks that are not human-initiated.
Impact on metrics: Automated interactions lead to inflated click-through rates, distorting true user engagement and potentially leading to misinformed campaign optimization.
Reputation considerations: While legitimate, high volumes of automated clicks from specific networks (e.g., data centers) can be misinterpreted by algorithms assessing sender behavior.
Key considerations
Monitoring tools: Documentation often advises utilizing monitoring tools, like Google Postmaster Tools, to identify unusual click patterns or IP addresses.
Data segregation: The importance of segregating automated clicks from human clicks for accurate reporting is a recurring theme. This helps ensure accurate spam rate understanding.
Protocol awareness: While not directly about bots, an understanding of email authentication protocols like DMARC, SPF, and DKIM is fundamental to overall email health and avoiding spam issues. Marketing Brew's article on bot clicks from data center IPs offers relevant insights.
Technical article
The official M3AAWG document on non-human interactions details the various types of automated activities affecting email. It categorizes these interactions and their potential impact on email campaign metrics and deliverability reporting.
15 Jan 2022 - M3AAWG
Technical article
Google Postmaster Tools documentation indicates that unusual click patterns, particularly those originating from automated systems, can influence sender reputation algorithms. This suggests the importance of monitoring click source data closely.