Understanding whether your emails are automatically going to the spam folder is a common challenge for senders. Unlike a recipient manually marking an email as spam, which gives direct feedback, automatic filtering often occurs silently. There's no single, direct way to check an individual email's destination in real-time after it's sent. Instead, you must rely on indirect indicators and proactive testing methods to gauge your deliverability performance.
Key findings
Indirect indicators: Direct visibility into individual recipient inboxes is not possible. You must use indirect signs.
Open rate drops: A sudden or significant decrease in your email open rates, especially if it drops by 5-10% or more, is a strong indicator that emails are landing in spam.
Complaint rates: For high-volume senders, an unusual drop to zero complaints might signal that emails are being filtered before they even reach the inbox for recipients to mark as spam.
User feedback: Recipients might inform you directly if they aren't receiving your emails or find them in their spam folder.
Seed testing: Using seed lists (a collection of email addresses at various ISPs) allows you to see where your emails land across different providers.
Key considerations
Monitoring is key: Regularly monitor your email campaign metrics for signs of deliverability issues. This includes not just opens, but also clicks and bounces.
Reputation checks: Your IP and domain reputation heavily influence inbox placement. Tools like SenderScore.org can provide insights into your sending reputation.
Authentication: Ensure your emails are properly authenticated with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. Misconfiguration can lead to spam filtering.
Auditing practices: Regularly audit your email sending practices to prevent issues. For a comprehensive check, refer to our guide on how to run an email deliverability test.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often face the challenge of their campaigns not reaching the inbox, even without direct notifications. They frequently rely on a combination of observation and testing to diagnose if emails are going to spam. Marketers highlight key metrics and the lack of explicit feedback as primary indicators, emphasizing proactive measures over reactive fixes.
Key opinions
Indirect assessment: It's generally agreed that there's no direct method to see if a single email lands in a spam folder. Marketers must infer this from other data.
Performance indicators: Low or zero open rates are considered significant red flags indicating spam folder delivery, as images (which track opens) aren't loaded.
Sudden drop in engagement: A precipitous drop in open rates, sometimes as much as 5-10% or more, is a tell-tale sign of filtering.
Complaint anomaly: For high-volume senders, an extended period of zero complaints might paradoxically suggest emails are being blocked before recipients can even report them.
Key considerations
Proactive testing: Marketers frequently use seed testing services to predict where their emails will land across various ISPs.
List hygiene: Sending to unengaged or old contacts can harm your sender reputation and increase the likelihood of landing in spam. Learn more about why emails go to spam.
Content review: Spam filter triggers often relate to email content, including specific keywords or HTML issues. A good guide on why your emails go to spam can help identify these.
Sender reputation: Maintaining a healthy sender reputation is crucial to inbox placement.
Marketer view
An email marketer from Email Geeks indicates that it's only possible to tell indirectly if emails are automatically sent to spam folders. They suggest observing user reports and using seed tests or panel data as common methods to infer deliverability.For high-volume senders, a noticeable decrease in user complaints to near zero for an extended period could paradoxically be a strong clue that their emails are being filtered by spam defenses, preventing them from even reaching the inbox where users might complain.
05 Nov 2018 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
A marketer from OptinMonster highlights that a primary reason emails end up in spam folders is sending to recipients who have not explicitly subscribed to your list. When users flag such unsolicited messages as spam, it signals email providers to be more aggressive in filtering future emails from that sender.This behavior negatively impacts sender reputation, making it harder for legitimate emails to reach the inbox, even for other subscribers. Building a permission-based list is crucial to avoid this issue and improve deliverability.
23 Sep 2024 - OptinMonster
What the experts say
Deliverability experts consistently point out the complexities of determining spam folder placement. They stress the lack of direct insight into individual inboxes, emphasizing the importance of monitoring aggregated data, managing sender reputation, and understanding the nuances of IP warming and authentication protocols.
Key opinions
No direct visibility: Experts confirm there is no direct way to see if an email lands in a specific recipient's spam folder.
Open rate decline: A sudden, significant drop in open rates, typically 5-10% or more, is a key indicator that emails are being filtered.
IP warming importance: Proper IP warming is critical for new mail streams; if an IP was warmed up weeks ago, re-warming might be necessary based on sending patterns.
Reputation tools: Utilizing tools like Cisco Talos Intelligence provides insight into IP and domain reputation.
Key considerations
Gentle volume ramp-up: When establishing a new mail stream or IP, volume should be increased gradually to build trust with ISPs and avoid triggering spam filters.
Blocklist status: Being listed on an email blocklist (or blacklist) will severely impact deliverability. You should be checking these regularly through a blocklist monitoring service.
Understanding filtering: Spam filters apply scores to emails; if a score exceeds a certain threshold, the email is flagged. More information on how to avoid emails going to spam is essential.
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks reiterates that there is no direct visibility into individual recipients' inboxes. This means senders cannot confirm in real-time if a particular email bypassed the inbox and landed in spam.This lack of direct insight necessitates reliance on aggregated data and indirect signals to assess deliverability performance.
05 Nov 2018 - Email Geeks
Expert view
An expert from Spam Resource states that building a good sender reputation takes time and consistent, positive sending behavior. A sudden change in sending volume or content can negatively impact this reputation.They emphasize that maintaining a steady, healthy send volume and engaging content are crucial for sustained inbox placement.
12 Apr 2024 - Spam Resource
What the documentation says
Official documentation from email service providers and industry bodies often outlines the factors influencing email deliverability and how spam filters operate. While not providing a direct 'spam check' tool, these resources detail the technical requirements and best practices that, if not followed, significantly increase the likelihood of emails being automatically filtered to the spam or junk folder.
Key findings
Authentication standards: ISPs (Internet Service Providers) heavily rely on SPF, DKIM, and DMARC for validating sender identity. Failure in these checks can lead to automatic filtering.
Content analysis: Spam filters analyze email content for suspicious keywords, formatting issues, and malicious links. Certain scores trigger spam folder placement.
Sender reputation scores: Reputation is dynamic and based on various factors like bounce rates, spam complaints, and engagement. Low scores directly correlate with increased spam placement.
List quality: Sending to invalid or unengaged addresses impacts your sending reputation, signaling poor list management to ISPs.
Key considerations
Compliance with guidelines: Adhering to ISP-specific guidelines and industry best practices is crucial for consistent inbox delivery. For example, understanding how to comply with Outlook's new sender requirements can be vital.
Monitoring DMARC reports: DMARC reports provide detailed feedback on authentication failures, which are strong indicators of potential spam folder placement. Tools like understanding DMARC reports from Google and Yahoo can assist.
Reputation management: Regularly checking your IP and domain against public blacklists (or blocklists) and working to remove any listings is fundamental to deliverability.
Engagement metrics: High engagement (opens, clicks, replies) signals positive sender reputation, while low engagement can lead to filtering. Mailchimp's resources on avoiding spam filters emphasize this.
Technical article
Documentation from Klaviyo Help Center indicates that inbox providers use spam filters to determine whether or not your emails reach the inbox. While direct observation of individual spam placements is not possible, it is feasible to monitor broader trends in spam folder delivery through various metrics.They emphasize the importance of understanding these filtering mechanisms to proactively improve email deliverability and ensure messages consistently reach their intended destination.
10 Nov 2022 - Klaviyo Help Center
Technical article
The Twilio blog states that spam filters assign a score to each email based on various criteria, and if this score exceeds a predetermined threshold, the email will be flagged as spam and sent directly to the junk folder. Each spam filter may function with slightly different parameters.This highlights the need for senders to optimize their email content, sending practices, and authentication to keep their spam scores low across diverse filtering systems.