Summary
The Spam Complaint Level (SCL) on Outlook is a crucial indicator of how Microsoft’s filtering systems perceive your emails. A lower SCL, such as SCL 1, indicates a high level of trust, meaning your emails are likely to land in the recipient's inbox. Conversely, a higher SCL, like SCL 5, signals that your messages are considered more likely to be junk, leading to them being routed to the spam folder. This often presents a challenge for marketers, as transactional emails (like double opt-in confirmations) might achieve a low SCL, while broader marketing campaigns struggle with higher SCLs, even with simple plain-text content. Improving your SCL is essential for maintaining strong email deliverability to Outlook and Hotmail users.
Key findings
- SCL variation: Transactional emails often have a significantly lower SCL than marketing emails, even when sent from the same setup.
- Recipient perception: The primary difference in SCL between email types often stems from how recipients engage with and perceive the content. Emails they expect and find valuable are less likely to be marked as spam.
- Content relevance: Even plain-text marketing emails can receive a high SCL if their content or sending practices are not aligned with recipient expectations. This suggests that the issue extends beyond simple content formatting.
- Filtering mechanism: Outlook's filtering relies heavily on a combination of sender reputation and recipient feedback, influencing the SCL assignment.
Key considerations
- Active consent: Ensure all recipients have actively opted in to receive your emails. Ambiguous opt-in methods, such as pre-checked boxes, can lead to higher spam complaints and consequently, a higher SCL. Focus on clear, explicit consent to build a healthy list.
- Recipient behavior: Analyze why your marketing emails are being marked as junk. It could be due to content, frequency, or relevance. Your strategy needs to meet recipient wants and expectations. For more on this, see our guide on how to troubleshoot Outlook email deliverability.
- List hygiene: Regularly clean your email lists by removing inactive subscribers and those who have marked your emails as spam. Utilizing feedback loops (FBLs) from Junk Mail Reporting (JMR) programs is crucial for this process. To understand more about why emails get marked as spam, read our article how do you get spam complaints.
- Content and frequency: Evaluate your sending frequency and the relevance of your content. Sending too often, or sending irrelevant offers (e.g., marketing products already purchased), can increase spam complaints. As highlighted by the Spotler blog on Microsoft junk emails, SCL and Bulk Complaint Level (BCL) are key scores for inbox placement.
What email marketers say
Email marketers frequently encounter varying Spam Complaint Levels (SCLs) for different types of emails, with transactional messages often performing better than promotional ones. Their discussions typically revolve around optimizing list acquisition, managing recipient expectations, and refining content strategies to avoid the junk folder. The core challenge lies in understanding why subscribers, who may have initially opted in, still mark marketing emails as spam.
Key opinions
- Confirmed opt-in effectiveness: Many marketers agree that confirmed opt-in (COI) significantly improves inbox placement for initial confirmation emails, but subsequent marketing sends can still face SCL challenges, even for confirmed subscribers.
- Recipient dissatisfaction: The main reason for a higher SCL on marketing emails is often that recipients simply don't like the content or frequency, even if they explicitly opted in. This suggests a need to re-evaluate overall email strategy.
- Beyond technical fixes: While technical configurations are important, marketers often find that the solution to high SCL scores lies more in adapting content and sending practices to better match subscriber expectations rather than just technical adjustments.
- Importance of feedback loops: Cleaning data through Feedback Loops (FBLs) and Junk Mail Reporting (JMR) programs is frequently cited as a crucial step to maintain a clean list and improve sender reputation.
Key considerations
- Audience segmentation: Segmenting your audience and tailoring content to their specific interests can significantly reduce spam complaints. Irrelevant content, even to an opted-in list, can trigger negative recipient feedback, which Microsoft's filters use to assign a higher SCL. For strategies to improve deliverability to Microsoft Outlook, consult our best practices.
- Sending volume and frequency: Excessive sending or sending too frequently can quickly lead to subscriber fatigue and increased spam complaints, directly impacting your SCL. Re-evaluate your email calendar and volume for marketing campaigns.
- Expectation management: Clearly communicate what subscribers can expect from your emails during the opt-in process. This helps manage expectations and reduces unexpected spam markings for subsequent marketing emails. To avoid the spam folder, refer to our guide on preventing emails from going to spam.
- Feedback loop utilization: Actively enroll in and monitor feedback loop (FBL) programs, such as Microsoft's Junk Mail Reporting (JMR), to receive notifications when recipients mark your emails as spam. This data is invaluable for promptly removing disengaged users and maintaining a healthy sending reputation. Klaviyo's blog on email deliverability best practices reinforces the importance of minimizing spam complaints.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks indicates that the challenge lies in understanding why marketing emails, despite coming from a reliable setup, receive higher SCLs than transactional ones. The key takeaway is that mere technical setup parity isn't enough; recipient perception and engagement levels are critical.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks suggests focusing on active opt-in. They highlight that simply forgetting to uncheck a box does not constitute active opting-in. This means recipients who are not genuinely interested are more likely to mark emails as spam, negatively impacting SCL.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts consistently emphasize that achieving a good Spam Complaint Level (SCL) on Outlook is a multi-faceted challenge that goes beyond basic email authentication. They point to the critical role of recipient engagement and list quality as primary drivers of how Microsoft's filters assess incoming mail. The consensus is that even with perfect technical setup, a poor sending strategy will result in high SCLs.
Key opinions
- Engagement is paramount: Experts stress that user engagement (opens, clicks, replies) and lack of negative actions (deletions without opening, spam complaints) heavily influence SCL. Highly engaged recipients signal trustworthiness to ISPs.
- List hygiene is non-negotiable: Maintaining a clean, active email list, free from stale addresses and known complainers, is fundamental. This includes processing feedback loops diligently.
- Content and reputation synergy: It's not just about what you send, but who you send it to and how they react. A strong sending reputation is built on consistent positive recipient interactions over time, which directly impacts SCL.
- Beyond technical compliance: While authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is a baseline, experts confirm that it alone cannot overcome poor sender behavior or low recipient engagement that leads to high SCLs. This is further explored in our guide on fixing Outlook junk mail placement even with proper authentication.
Key considerations
- Sender reputation management: Proactively manage your sender reputation by monitoring blacklists/blocklists and ensuring your domain and IP addresses are not compromised. A tarnished reputation can lead to higher SCLs regardless of content quality. Use a practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation to help.
- Audience re-engagement: Implement re-engagement campaigns for less active subscribers before segmenting them out. This can help improve overall list health and signal positive engagement to Microsoft’s filters. However, if they don't re-engage, remove them.
- Consistent content quality: Ensure your marketing content consistently provides value to your subscribers. Irrelevant or overly promotional content can increase the likelihood of spam complaints and a higher SCL. For a broader overview, check why your emails go to spam.
- Monitor and adapt: Continuously monitor your deliverability metrics, including SCL (if accessible), and adapt your sending strategy based on performance. Being proactive helps maintain a healthy sender reputation and lower SCLs. Spamhaus's official site provides general guidelines on preventing emails from being blocked.
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource emphasizes that deliverability is a dynamic process influenced heavily by recipient behavior. A positive SCL is built on consistent positive engagement, meaning recipients are opening, clicking, and replying, rather than marking as spam. Senders should prioritize content that fosters such interactions.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise advises that email authentication, while foundational, is not a silver bullet for SCL issues. While SPF, DKIM, and DMARC establish legitimacy, they cannot override negative user feedback. The core problem often lies in the content and how it's perceived by the recipient.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and technical guides from major mailbox providers and email security companies offer insights into how Spam Complaint Level (SCL) is determined and what steps can be taken to influence it positively. These resources often emphasize the role of email authentication, sender reputation, and recipient feedback loops as integral components of their spam filtering algorithms. Understanding these documented principles is key to aligning your sending practices with the requirements of major ISPs like Microsoft Outlook.
Key findings
- SCL as a core metric: Microsoft actively uses SCL to classify incoming emails, with higher scores leading to junk or quarantine folders. This metric is a central component of their anti-spam protection.
- BCL integration: The Bulk Complaint Level (BCL) threshold is a configurable setting for secure email systems, and adjusting it (e.g., to 6 or lower) is important for effective spam protection, indicating a direct link between complaints and deliverability.
- Authentication baseline: Proper email authentication, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, is consistently highlighted as a fundamental requirement to pass initial filtering checks and avoid a negative sender reputation which would impact SCL.
- User feedback impact: Outlook's junk mail filter adapts based on user feedback. If users frequently move emails to junk or mark them as spam, it contributes to a higher SCL for similar future messages.
Key considerations
- Secure score adjustments: Documentation, such as from the AdminDroid Blog, suggests that adjusting the email Bulk Complaint Level (BCL) threshold to 6 or lower is important for a secure email system, directly impacting SCL. This indicates the importance of managing perceived bulk mail.
- Anti-spam configuration: Microsoft's junk action and spam engines, as discussed by Perception Point Support, use sophisticated methods to detect spam. Senders must ensure their email infrastructure and content avoid triggering these mechanisms. Implementing DMARC (and SPF, DKIM) is a key part of this. For more, see a simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM.
- Filter protection levels: Users can change the level of protection in their Junk Email Filter settings, implying that overly aggressive filters on the recipient's side can also lead to higher SCLs. However, senders primarily control the content and sender reputation. To prevent emails from going to spam in Microsoft Hotmail or Outlook, check our guide.
- Compliance with sender requirements: Adhering to general email deliverability best practices, such as providing visible unsubscribe links and avoiding spammy content, directly influences how mailbox providers perceive your emails and assign SCLs. Our blog post on how to comply with Outlook's new sender requirements offers detailed guidance.
Technical article
Documentation from AdminDroid Blog explains that setting the email Bulk Complaint Level (BCL) threshold to 6 or lower is critical for a secure email system. This adjustment plays a significant role in determining how readily an email is classified as spam by Microsoft, thereby impacting its SCL. A proactive approach to BCL configuration helps maintain a healthy sending reputation and better inbox placement.
Technical article
Documentation from Spotler emphasizes that if emails consistently miss the inbox, it typically comes down to two key scores: Spam Confidence Level (SCL) and Bulk Complaint Level (BCL). Both metrics are central to Microsoft's filtering decisions. Understanding and optimizing for both SCL and BCL is paramount for improving deliverability to Outlook.
Related resources
7 resources
Related pages
How to troubleshoot and resolve Outlook email deliverability and spam filtering issues?
How to prevent emails from going to spam in Microsoft Hotmail or Outlook?
What are the best practices for improving email deliverability to Microsoft Outlook and Hotmail?
How to fix Outlook junk mail placement and high SCL scores despite proper email authentication?
How do you get spam complaints?
Why are my emails marked with a high BCL score and landing in junk folders, and how can I fix it?
How to comply with outlook's new sender requirements
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024 and how to fix it
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
