Summary
Achieving optimal inbox placement in Outlook and managing Spam Confidence Level (SCL) scores often requires a multifaceted approach beyond merely implementing proper email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. The primary determinant of deliverability in Microsoft environments is a strong sender reputation, which is profoundly influenced by recipient engagement, content quality, and consistent sending practices. Factors such as high complaint rates, low engagement, spammy content, and issues with list hygiene can significantly elevate SCL scores and direct emails to the junk folder, even if technical authentication is perfect. Additionally, external mail filters, layered by some organizations, can also play a role in how messages are processed. Addressing these underlying issues through proactive reputation management, meticulous list hygiene, and valuable content is key to improving deliverability.
Key findings
- Reputation Trumps Authentication: While email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is essential, it alone is not sufficient to guarantee good Outlook deliverability or low SCL scores. Microsoft's filtering heavily relies on overall sender reputation-for the IP, domain, and mailstream-which goes beyond just authentication.
- Engagement Drives Reputation: Sender reputation is primarily influenced by user engagement metrics, including opens, clicks, replies, and whether emails are moved from junk to inbox. Conversely, negative actions like deleting without reading or marking as spam significantly degrade reputation and increase SCL scores.
- Content and Consistency Matter: Email content itself (spammy phrases, excessive links) and inconsistent sending volumes can trigger filters. High bounce rates and a history of sending to invalid addresses also negatively impact reputation and deliverability.
- External Filters Impact Deliverability: Messages marked as spam, even with proper Office 365 SCL, might indicate the presence of external filters like Proofpoint or TitanHQ, which can be layered on top of Office 365 by middleware vendors and might not be immediately apparent to companies.
- SCL is Configurable: SCL (Spam Confidence Level) is an Office 365 metric based on Microsoft's Content Filter and Exchange Online Protection (EOP). SCL values determine message actions (e.g., move to Junk Email), and administrators can configure their own SCL thresholds for mail delivery.
Key considerations
- Prioritize List Hygiene: Regularly clean email lists by removing inactive, invalid, or unengaged subscribers. This reduces bounce rates and complaint rates, which are strong positive signals to email providers like Microsoft.
- Enhance Recipient Engagement: Send valuable, relevant content that encourages opens, clicks, and positive interactions. High engagement signals trustworthiness to filters, directly improving sender reputation.
- Manage Sender Reputation Actively: Monitor your sending IP and domain reputation through tools like Microsoft's Smart Network Data Services (SNDS) and Junk Mail Reporting Program (JMRP). Address any negative signals promptly, such as high complaint rates or blocklist placements. For new sending IPs or domains, implement a proper warm-up process.
- Review Email Content: Carefully scrutinize email copy for spam trigger words, excessive capitalization, unusual formatting, or overly promotional language that can flag filters. Ensure content provides clear value to the recipient.
- Adjust EOP Policies: For administrators, review and configure anti-spam policies within Exchange Online Protection (EOP). Adjusting SCL thresholds can influence how messages are treated, even if authenticated.
- Address Underlying Sending Practices: Identify and rectify aggressive sending practices or poor email list collection methods that lead to recipients disliking your mail. Temporary fixes will not sustain improved deliverability; focus on genuinely improving audience and list quality.
What email marketers say
11 marketer opinions
While proper email authentication is a foundational element of deliverability, it is often insufficient on its own to prevent emails from landing in Outlook's junk folder or receiving high Spam Confidence Level (SCL) scores. Microsoft's filtering mechanisms, particularly Exchange Online Protection (EOP), heavily weigh sender reputation-a multifaceted metric influenced by recipient engagement, list hygiene, sending consistency, and content quality. Even with robust authentication, factors like low engagement, high bounce rates, spammy content, or sudden changes in sending volume can trigger filters. Therefore, a holistic approach is essential, focusing on maintaining a pristine sender reputation through meticulous list management, creating valuable and engaging content, and adhering to best practices for sending volume and patterns, including proper IP warmup for new infrastructure.
Key opinions
- EOP Filtering Nuances: Microsoft's Exchange Online Protection (EOP) primarily filters emails based on sender IP and domain reputation, authentication, and campaign detection, with content analysis playing a supporting role in SCL score assignment.
- Beyond Authentication Factors: Even with perfect SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, emails often land in Outlook's junk folder due to a poor sender reputation, low recipient engagement, high bounce rates, or content issues.
- Holistic Deliverability Required: Fixing Outlook junk mail placement demands a comprehensive strategy encompassing excellent sender reputation, consistent recipient engagement, regular list cleaning, and active avoidance of spam traps.
- IP Warmup Necessity: For new sending IPs or domains, a gradual IP warmup process is crucial to establish a positive sender reputation with major ISPs like Microsoft, preventing high SCL scores and junk folder placement.
- Content-Based Triggers: Spam trigger words, excessive capitalization, unusual formatting, or overly promotional content are significant factors that can lead to high SCL scores and junk folder delivery, irrespective of authentication.
Key considerations
- Database Health & Collection: Regularly audit database activity, remove inactive contacts, and critically review email list collection methods to prevent issues at the source.
- Proactive Reputation Management: Consistently monitor sending IP and domain reputation, check for blocklist placements, and implement a strategic IP warmup for new sending infrastructure to build trust with Microsoft.
- Engagement-Centric Content: Craft email content that provides value and encourages high recipient engagement-opens, clicks, and positive interactions-while meticulously avoiding spam trigger words, excessive links, or overly promotional language.
- List Hygiene Discipline: Implement rigorous and ongoing list cleaning practices to remove unengaged, invalid, or inactive subscribers, thereby reducing bounce rates and improving overall list health.
- Consistent Sending Patterns: Maintain a consistent sending volume and schedule to establish predictable and trustworthy sending patterns with ISPs like Microsoft, avoiding sudden spikes that can trigger filters.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks advises improving email deliverability by checking database activity, removing inactive contacts, and reviewing the methods used for collecting the email database.
9 May 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that SCL scores are based on Microsoft's Content Filter and describes Exchange Online Protection (EOP). EOP is a cloud-based email filtering service that primarily relies on sending IP and domain reputation, authentication, campaign detection, and spammer hosting infrastructure reputation for filtering, with content filters playing a lesser role.
25 Nov 2024 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
4 expert opinions
Achieving favorable inbox placement and reducing high Spam Confidence Level (SCL) scores in Outlook environments requires moving beyond mere email authentication. Experts emphasize that deliverability is fundamentally driven by the sender's comprehensive mailstream and domain reputation, which Microsoft's filters heavily weigh. This reputation is primarily shaped by real recipient behavior, including engagement levels and complaint rates, rather than just technical setup. Furthermore, the presence of external, third-party spam filters operating in conjunction with Office 365 can significantly influence message routing. Therefore, sustainable improvements depend on addressing underlying aggressive sending practices, cultivating positive recipient interactions through valuable content, and diligently maintaining list hygiene to reflect genuine subscriber interest.
Key opinions
- Mailstream Reputation Dominates: Email filters, particularly those at Microsoft, assess overall mailstream reputation, which encompasses more than just individual IP or domain reputation, making a holistic view of sending practices critical.
- Engagement Outweighs Authentication: While essential, proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is not sufficient to guarantee good Outlook deliverability. Sender reputation, heavily influenced by user engagement and complaint rates, is the primary driver for low SCL scores and inbox placement.
- External Filters Can Intervene: Messages marked as spam with a junk filter 'other than the Outlook Junk Email filter' often indicate the presence of external security solutions, like Proofpoint, layered on top of Office 365, which can bypass standard Outlook filtering mechanisms.
- SCL Thresholds are Configurable: SCL (Spam Confidence Level) is an Office 365 metric. An SCL 5 is a mid-range score, and companies often set their own SCL thresholds, meaning even a moderate score can result in mail being placed in bulk or junk folders depending on an organization's specific configurations.
- Temporary Fixes Unsustainable: Attempting temporary fixes, such as changing sender details or content types, only works by making mail appear different from previously disliked mailstreams. These are unsustainable, and mail will revert to junk unless audience and list quality issues are genuinely addressed.
Key considerations
- Address Root Causes: Shift focus from temporary fixes, which only alter how mail appears, to rectifying core issues such as aggressive sending strategies and inadequate email list collection that lead to recipient disengagement.
- Enhance List Quality: Implement rigorous list hygiene practices, including removing unengaged subscribers and avoiding purchased or old, unvalidated lists. This minimizes negative signals like high bounce and complaint rates.
- Foster Positive Engagement: Design email campaigns to encourage active recipient engagement, such as opens, clicks, and replies. Actively prompt recipients to move your emails from the junk folder to their inbox, as these actions significantly boost sender reputation.
- Monitor Microsoft Programs: Leverage Microsoft's Smart Network Data Services (SNDS) and Junk Mail Reporting Program (JMRP) to gain insights into your sender reputation, monitor complaint rates, and proactively address any emerging deliverability issues.
- Investigate External Filters: Be aware that external spam filters, such as Proofpoint or TitanHQ, might be layered on top of Office 365 by middleware vendors. These can independently impact deliverability and should be investigated if Outlook junk mail persists despite good SCL scores.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that email filters operate based on the overall mailstream reputation, not just IP or domain. She notes that temporary fixes, like changing sender details or content type, only work by making mail appear different from the client's disliked mailstream. The underlying issue is the client's aggressive sending practices and poor email list collection, leading to recipients disliking their mail. These temporary solutions are unsustainable and mail will revert to junk unless the audience and list quality are genuinely addressed.
24 Nov 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks clarifies that the message "marked as spam using a junk filter other than the Outlook Junk Email filter" often indicates the presence of external filters layered on top of Office365, such as Proofpoint or TitanHQ, which companies might not be aware of if they use a middleware vendor. She confirms SCL (Spam Confidence Level) is an Office365 metric, explaining that SCL 5 is a mid-range score, and companies set their own SCL thresholds for mail to be delivered to bulk folders.
11 Nov 2024 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
To resolve Outlook junk mail placement and high Spam Confidence Level (SCL) scores, even with proper email authentication, a multi-faceted approach is essential. This involves proactively managing sender reputation through consistent, high-quality sending, ensuring low complaint rates, and avoiding invalid addresses. Administrators can also directly influence deliverability by reviewing and configuring anti-spam policies within Exchange Online Protection (EOP) to adjust sensitivity. Furthermore, addressing a potential IP blocklist entry through Microsoft's delist portal may be a necessary step, emphasizing that content quality and overall sender behavior are key determinants alongside technical setup.
Key findings
- Content/Reputation SCL Impact: High SCL scores, even with proper authentication, primarily indicate that message content or the sender's overall reputation is negatively influencing delivery to the inbox.
- EOP Policy Influence: Outlook's junk mail placement and SCL scores are directly influenced by administrator-configured anti-spam policies within Exchange Online Protection (EOP), allowing for sensitivity adjustments.
- Sender Reputation Imperative: A positive sender reputation, built on low complaint rates, valid recipient lists, and consistent sending volumes, is crucial for deliverability and to mitigate high SCLs, extending beyond basic authentication protocols.
- IP Blocklist Resolution: An IP address being on Microsoft's blocked senders list is a direct cause of junk mail placement, which can be addressed by requesting removal through their dedicated delist portal.
Key considerations
- Configure EOP Policies: Administrators should actively review and fine-tune anti-spam policies within Exchange Online Protection to control how messages are filtered and SCL scores are applied.
- Optimize Content: Ensure email content is high-quality, relevant, and free of spam trigger words or patterns, as content quality directly impacts SCL scores and junk mail placement.
- Prioritize Sender Reputation: Continuously work to improve sender reputation by maintaining low complaint rates, meticulously cleaning email lists, and ensuring consistent, legitimate sending patterns to build trust with Microsoft's filters.
- Initiate Delisting Requests: If your sending IP is blocklisted by Microsoft, promptly use their delist portal to request removal, which is a critical step for restoring deliverability.
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft Learn explains that high SCL (Spam Confidence Level) scores, despite proper authentication, often indicate that the message content or sender reputation is negatively impacting delivery. It details how different SCL values lead to specific actions like moving to Junk Email or blocking, highlighting that even authenticated emails can be filtered if other signals suggest spam.
30 Oct 2022 - Microsoft Learn
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft Learn explains that to fix Outlook junk mail placement and high SCL scores, administrators should review and configure anti-spam policies in Exchange Online Protection (EOP). These policies dictate how spam filtering is applied and can be adjusted for sensitivity, influencing SCL scores and subsequent message actions even for authenticated emails.
12 Dec 2022 - Microsoft Learn
How can I improve my Spam Complaint Level (SCL) on Outlook?
How to fix Hotmail/Outlook emails landing in spam even with proper authentication and opt-in?
Why are authenticated emails going to junk in Microsoft Outlook?
Why are my emails going to the junk folder in Outlook despite passing authentication checks?
Why are my emails marked with a high BCL score and landing in junk folders, and how can I fix it?
Why is Microsoft Defender marking my one-to-one emails as spam with a high SCL score when authentication is correct and there are no blacklist issues?
