While most modern email clients support HTML rendering, making it the dominant format, the percentage of emails viewed as HTML vs. plain text varies. B2C leans heavily toward HTML, while B2B, particularly in security-conscious sectors, sees a higher (though still minority) proportion of plain text views, possibly up to 10%. The specific industry or domain matters. Most clients display HTML by default, however, tracking engagement with plain text emails is difficult. Always provide a plain-text version, especially since spam filters are less likely to flag them, mobile users make up more than half of all email opens and you can alienate people by only sending HTML emails.
11 marketer opinions
The percentage of emails viewed in HTML versus plain text varies significantly depending on the audience and industry. While HTML emails are generally preferred for their design capabilities and branding opportunities, a significant portion of B2B recipients, particularly in high-security environments, may view plain text emails. It's important to note that tracking opens and clicks in plain text emails is challenging. Additionally, while most modern email clients support HTML, optimizing for mobile is crucial, and providing a plain text alternative ensures accessibility for users who prefer it or have security concerns.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Sendinblue.com explains that plain text emails are easier to read on mobile devices and may get through spam filters better.
24 Nov 2021 - Sendinblue.com
Marketer view
Email marketer from SuperOffice.com states that the general user experience with HTML emails is overwhelmingly positive. But it also states that a poor user experience with HTML is down to poor formatting, large images and cluttered designs. These all contribute to a poor user experience.
5 Sep 2023 - SuperOffice.com
6 expert opinions
Modern email clients overwhelmingly support and display HTML emails by default. While statistically, nearly all clients *can* render HTML, some older systems, specialized domains (like .mil), or security-conscious industries may necessitate or benefit from plain text alternatives. Although the majority will see HTML, having a plain text version as a fallback remains good practice.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that statistically, there are no email clients that don't support HTML, and any normal mail client will display the HTML version. There are a few rare special cases where the text/plain version will be used (crappy, old ticketing systems, obsolete smartwatches).
18 Mar 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that most modern email clients are capable of rendering HTML emails, so the vast majority of users will see the HTML version.
22 Sep 2022 - Spam Resource
5 technical articles
Most popular email clients (Apple Mail, Gmail, Outlook) support HTML rendering. Plain-text emails are less likely to be flagged as spam. Outlook displays HTML by default if capable. MIME defines email content types, with HTML offering richer styles. Non-standard HTML coding can lead to rendering issues across different platforms.
Technical article
Documentation from EmailToolTester explains how to test email deliverability rates. They state that Plain-text email is far less likely to be flagged as spam as it is often perceived as more safe.
21 Jul 2024 - EmailToolTester.com
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft.com states that Outlook will display HTML emails by default if the email client is capable of rendering HTML.
1 Jul 2021 - Microsoft.com
Are HTTP links penalized by spam filters in email marketing?
Are image-based emails a good practice, and what are the deliverability and accessibility implications?
Are image-only emails bad for deliverability?
Are there any ISPs or email clients that only accept text emails and reject HTML emails?
Does including a plain text version of an email improve deliverability and conversion rates?
How does HTML coding affect email deliverability and are emojis safe to use in email marketing?