Suped

Is ZoomInfo's interpretation of CAN-SPAM accurate regarding email marketing best practices?

Summary

ZoomInfo's assertion that email marketers only need to provide an opt-out mechanism to comply with the CAN-SPAM Act is a common, yet potentially misleading, interpretation. While the CAN-SPAM Act focuses on the legality of commercial emails and does indeed require a clear unsubscribe option, it does not fully encompass the broader landscape of email marketing best practices or the stringent policies of email service providers (ESPs) and mailbox providers (MBPs).

What email marketers say

Email marketers often find themselves navigating a complex landscape where legal compliance, platform terms of service, and practical deliverability hurdles intersect. While the CAN-SPAM Act sets legal boundaries, the consensus among marketers points to the need for much more stringent practices, particularly regarding consent and list acquisition, to actually reach the inbox.

Marketer view

An Email Geeks marketer points out that ZoomInfo's statement is precisely what they tell their customers, emphasizing that despite using popular ESPs, their underlying rules and guidelines for spam prevention are consistent. The key takeaway is the misconception that opt-in emails or 'permission' are not necessary, as long as an opt-out option is provided per CAN-SPAM.

24 Sep 2021 - Email Geeks

Marketer view

An Email Geeks marketer states that while ZoomInfo's claim might not be legally incorrect, it's a poor practice. They highlight the audacity of ZoomInfo referencing ESP rules while simultaneously dismissing them by citing CAN-SPAM, pointing out that adherence to ESP terms of use is critical, regardless of legal standing.

24 Sep 2021 - Email Geeks

What the experts say

Email deliverability experts consistently emphasize that legal compliance, while necessary, is merely the baseline for email sending. The true determinants of inbox placement are sender reputation, recipient engagement, and adherence to mailbox provider guidelines, which often go far beyond the explicit requirements of the CAN-SPAM Act.

Expert view

An Email Geeks expert firmly states that ZoomInfo is wrong because CAN-SPAM is not the sole consideration for email sending. They clarify that an ESP's policy exists because mailbox providers dictate what is necessary for successful message delivery to recipients' inboxes, not solely due to legal mandates.

24 Sep 2021 - Email Geeks

Expert view

An expert from SpamResource highlights that compliance with legal frameworks like CAN-SPAM is merely a foundational layer for email sending, and it does not guarantee actual inbox placement. Real deliverability depends on much more than just legal adherence.

1 Jan 2024 - SpamResource

What the documentation says

Official documentation from regulatory bodies and general email standards provides the foundational rules for email sending. While the CAN-SPAM Act defines legal boundaries, the broader ecosystem of email relies on additional technical and ethical guidelines to ensure messages are delivered and not deemed spam.

Technical article

Documentation from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) clarifies that the CAN-SPAM Act mandates commercial emails to include a clear and prominent method for recipients to opt out of future communications, and that senders must honor these requests promptly within ten business days.

1 Jan 2024 - Federal Trade Commission

Technical article

The FTC documentation further states that while the CAN-SPAM Act does not explicitly require prior opt-in consent for sending commercial emails, all other provisions of the act must still be strictly followed, including accurate header information and non-deceptive subject lines.

1 Jan 2024 - Federal Trade Commission

8 resources

Start improving your email deliverability today

Get started