Summary
Emailing a customer list acquired from a competitor who has gone out of business presents significant challenges from both legal and deliverability standpoints. While the former competitor may have given their blessing, this does not automatically transfer the consent of the individual customers to receive emails from your company. The core issue revolves around consent, data privacy regulations, and the potential negative impact on your sender reputation.
Key findings
- Consent transfer: Direct consent from customers to your company is typically required. The competitor's permission to transfer their customer data does not equate to the customers' consent to receive communications from you.
- Legal ramifications: Data privacy laws, such as GDPR in Europe or CAN-SPAM in the US, govern how email lists can be used. Violating these can lead to significant penalties. Jurisdictional differences are crucial.
- Deliverability risk: Emailing a cold list, or one where recipients have no prior relationship with your domain, can lead to high spam complaints, bounces, and unsubscribes. This severely damages your sender reputation, potentially causing your legitimate emails to land in spam folders.
- No performance history: You lack data on how the list performed for the previous sender (bounces, complaints, engagement), making it a high-risk unknown. The former competitor's business failure may even suggest poor email practices (or at least ineffective ones).
Key considerations
- Legal counsel: Always consult with legal counsel to understand the specific laws applicable to your region and the nature of the data transfer, especially if it's not a formal acquisition of assets.
- Reputation is paramount: Protecting your email sender reputation is crucial for long-term deliverability. A single questionable mailing campaign can have lasting negative effects.
- Alternative re-engagement: Explore indirect methods. Can the defunct company send a final email introducing your service and inviting their customers to opt-in to your list? This is the safest approach for using an existing email list from a partner (even a defunct one).
- Transparency: If you decide to proceed with an initial contact, be entirely transparent. Explain how you obtained their data, why you're contacting them, and provide a clear opt-in option to continue receiving emails from you. Duncan Jones suggests creating a unique offer for their customers when a competitor closes.
- Data hygiene: Even with permission, the list needs extensive cleaning to remove invalid addresses, spam traps, and unengaged contacts before any mailing attempt.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often approach this situation with a blend of caution and practicality. While the opportunity to acquire new customers is enticing, many recognize the significant risks to their existing sender reputation and the potential for negative customer reactions. The prevailing sentiment leans towards prioritizing established email best practices over the immediate gain from a cold list.
Key opinions
- High risk of complaints: Many marketers foresee a high volume of spam complaints because recipients never opted in to receive emails from the new company.
- Reputational damage: The potential damage to the sender's domain and IP reputation is a primary concern, outweighing the perceived benefit of the list. Such damage could impact all future email campaigns.
- Lack of engagement data: Without historical engagement data from the competitor's sends, marketers are blind to the list's quality and potential for successful outreach.
- Ethical considerations: The ethical appropriateness of contacting individuals who have not explicitly opted into your company's communications is a recurring theme.
Key considerations
- Consent acquisition: The ideal scenario is for the original company to send a final email announcing their closure and inviting customers to opt-in to the new service. This maintains proper consent.
- Segmenting the list: If a mailing is attempted, it should be highly segmented and approached with extreme caution, prioritizing a re-opt-in message over promotional content. Using a gradual ramp-up is also advisable.
- Transparency in messaging: Any communication must clearly state how the recipient's information was obtained and why they are receiving the email, offering a clear path to opt-out. MarketingProfs discusses the appropriateness of contact.
- Risk of blocklisting: A high spam complaint rate from this type of mailing can lead to your IP or domain being added to a blacklist or blocklist, preventing delivery of all your emails.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks warns that a list obtained from a defunct competitor is considered a third-party contact list, meaning direct permission to email these contacts is absent. This lack of consent is a fundamental problem.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Quora advises that while it's appropriate to contact another business, the primary concern is not the email itself, but rather whether the customers have given permission for their data to be used by a new entity for marketing purposes.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts consistently highlight the critical importance of explicit consent and adherence to data protection laws when managing email lists. Their advice often focuses on mitigating risks to sender reputation and ensuring long-term inbox placement rather than pursuing short-term gains from potentially problematic data sources. The emphasis is on legality, proper data transfer mechanisms, and the ethical responsibility towards subscribers.
Key opinions
- Permission is paramount: Experts stress that true permission comes from the individual subscriber, not a third-party transfer, unless part of a legally defined asset acquisition where consent is implicitly transferred.
- Jurisdictional differences: The legality of such a transfer varies significantly by country and region, with places like the EU (GDPR) having much stricter rules than others (e.g., US CAN-SPAM, which is less consent-focused).
- Acquisition vs. gift: There's a crucial distinction between legally acquiring a company's assets (including customer data) and merely being given a list. Only the former typically permits continued emailing under the new entity.
- Reputational impact: Sending to unconsenting recipients inevitably leads to high spam complaints and spam trap hits, severely damaging the sender's reputation and deliverability across all campaigns.
Key considerations
- Consult legal counsel: Always seek professional legal advice to navigate complex data transfer scenarios and ensure compliance with relevant privacy legislation before attempting any outreach.
- Formal agreements: If any contact is made, ensure there's a legally binding agreement with the defunct company's representatives about the data transfer and explicit consent for a transitional message.
- Pilot programs: Consider sending a single, highly transparent message from the original company's domain or through a carefully managed co-branded message, clearly inviting recipients to opt into your services. Joel on Software addresses barriers to entry when switching from a competitor.
- Domain and IP strategy: If the previous company's domain and email infrastructure can be acquired, it might offer a slightly different approach, as discussed in company acquisition scenarios. However, this is distinct from just a list transfer.
- Customer benefit: If any communication happens, it must clearly explain the benefit to the customer, focusing on support continuity rather than sales, and explicitly inviting a new subscription. Quora discusses whether it is appropriate to contact a competitor's customers.
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks emphasizes that a competitor's blessing for a data transfer is irrelevant, as the individual data subjects have not granted explicit permission for the new company to possess or email their information.
Expert view
Email expert from SpamResource cautions that simply acquiring an email list, even from a well-meaning source, without proper, explicit opt-in from each subscriber for the new sender is a recipe for deliverability failure due to high complaints and spam trap hits.
What the documentation says
Official documentation from various regulatory bodies and industry standards consistently underscores the importance of explicit consent and transparent data practices. Regulations like CAN-SPAM in the United States and GDPR in the European Union provide legal frameworks that dictate how personal data, including email addresses, can be collected, processed, and used for marketing purposes. These documents prioritize the individual's right to privacy and control over their data, making the transfer of email consent a critical point of compliance.
Key findings
- Explicit consent: Many data protection laws, particularly GDPR, require clear, affirmative, and unambiguous consent for data processing and marketing communications. This consent must be specific to the entity sending the emails.
- Lawful basis for processing: Under GDPR, there must be a lawful basis for processing personal data. Consent is one, but a legitimate interest must also be carefully considered, especially in B2B contexts. A mere gift of a list is rarely sufficient.
- Purpose limitation: Data should only be processed for the specific purposes for which it was collected. If a customer consented to emails from Company A, this doesn't automatically extend to Company B.
- Identification and opt-out: The CAN-SPAM Act requires all commercial emails to clearly identify the sender and provide a clear, conspicuous, and functional opt-out mechanism.
Key considerations
- Jurisdiction-specific laws: Understanding and complying with the specific email marketing laws of the countries where your recipients reside is critical. Ignoring regulations like CAN-SPAM has serious dangers.
- Privacy policy updates: Your company's privacy policy should clearly state how customer data is collected, used, and shared, including any third-party transfers. It's often required that this be updated if new data sources are integrated.
- Record keeping: Maintain clear records of consent for all email addresses. If you cannot demonstrate how consent was obtained for your specific company, you are at risk. Familiarity with email authentication protocols like DMARC, SPF, and DKIM is also essential for deliverability and compliance.
- No implied consent: Unless the defunct company's terms of service explicitly allowed for data transfer to an acquiring entity or partner for ongoing communication, implied consent from customers is not a legal basis for new emails. Fleximize details attracting customers through compliant means.
Technical article
Documentation from the CAN-SPAM Act states that all commercial emails must include a clear and conspicuous notice that the message is an advertisement or solicitation, ensuring transparency for recipients. This also applies when taking over a list.
Technical article
GDPR Article 6 specifies that processing of personal data is lawful only if, and to the extent that, at least one lawful basis applies, such as the data subject giving consent to the processing of their personal data for one or more specific purposes. This makes direct consent crucial.
Related resources
13 resources
Related pages
What are the best practices for using an existing email list for a new sub-company?
How do internal email addresses get added to purchased lists?
What are the dangers of scraping emails and ignoring CAN-SPAM?
How do I start emailing a large list with no engagement history?
What are the issues with sending email updates to very old email lists?
Is purchasing email lists a good strategy for local business?
What are the risks and downsides of cold emailing a purchased list?
What is the best practice for gaining new customers from a partner using email?
Is it legal to reuse an email list after a company acquisition?
An in-depth guide to email blocklists
