Using a DMARC policy of p=none is widely recommended as an initial monitoring phase. It allows domain owners to collect data on email traffic, identify sending sources (including third-party services), and pinpoint authentication issues without impacting email deliverability. DMARC reports generated through this policy provide valuable insights for configuring SPF and DKIM records, preparing for stricter DMARC enforcement, and preventing the accidental blocking of legitimate emails. Some incorrectly believe 'p=none' guarantees inbox placement, or that it's the same as not having DMARC; however, its true value lies in providing visibility before enforcing stricter policies.
9 marketer opinions
A DMARC policy of p=none is primarily used for monitoring email traffic and gathering data on authentication status without impacting email delivery. It allows domain owners to identify sending sources, detect authentication failures, and ensure legitimate services are properly configured with SPF and DKIM before implementing stricter DMARC policies. While some perceive it as being the same as having no DMARC policy, its main value lies in providing visibility and insights into email streams.
Marketer view
Email marketer from StackOverflow explains that the main reason to use p=none is for monitoring. You get reports showing which IPs are sending mail using your domain, and how many are failing DMARC. You use this info to adjust your SPF and DKIM settings before enforcing DMARC.
13 May 2023 - StackOverflow
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks agrees with starting with a DMARC policy of 'None' based on his readings and webinars.
25 Oct 2023 - Email Geeks
4 expert opinions
Using a DMARC policy of 'p=none' is primarily recommended as an initial step for monitoring email traffic. It allows domain owners to gather data about email authentication failures and identify legitimate sending sources that may not be properly configured, all without impacting email deliverability. It is important to enable RUA data when using 'p=none'. Starting with 'p=none' avoids the risk of losing legitimate mail early on.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise shares that using p=none allows you to see how your email is being handled without causing deliverability problems. It is also an important tool to help you find places that send mail you don’t know about. It can also help you find authentication problems in your known sending sources.
23 Jun 2024 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that starting with a DMARC policy of 'None' is advisable, as enforcing it too early can risk losing mail.
10 Apr 2025 - Email Geeks
3 technical articles
Setting a DMARC policy to p=none is primarily for monitoring and reporting purposes, as confirmed by documentation from Google, Microsoft, and DMARC.org. It allows for the collection of DMARC reports without affecting email delivery, providing visibility into email streams and enabling identification of sending sources and authentication issues. It's a recommended first step before implementing stricter DMARC policies.
Technical article
Documentation from Google Workspace Admin Help explains that setting a DMARC policy to p=none allows you to monitor DMARC reports without impacting email delivery. It advises regularly reviewing these reports to identify sending sources and authentication issues before moving to a stricter policy.
31 Mar 2023 - Google Workspace Admin Help
Technical article
Documentation from DMARC.org explains that a DMARC policy of p=none means 'take no action' regarding emails that fail DMARC authentication. It's primarily used for gaining visibility into email streams and assessing the impact of moving to stricter policies.
29 Jan 2025 - DMARC.org
Can I set DMARC to reject if my domain doesn't send email?
Does a DMARC policy of 'none' negatively impact email reputation?
Does implementing DMARC improve email deliverability and is DMARC p=none policy useful?
How do DMARC quarantine and reject policies affect sender reputation and email delivery?
How should I enforce DMARC policies for a bulk sender with p=none?