DMARC adoption is steadily increasing globally, driven by growing awareness of email security threats like phishing and spoofing, the need to protect brand reputation, and the incentive of BIMI adoption. While DMARC might not become a strict requirement soon, aligning with SPF and DKIM for DMARC readiness is a best practice. Benefits include improved deliverability and protection from fraudulent emails. However, implementation costs and business process changes can be significant barriers. Future expectations involve stricter enforcement by mailbox providers and increased importance of DMARC reporting. Starting with DMARC on new domains is easier than retrofitting existing ones. Organizations should aim for full DMARC compliance, even if gradually, and proactively monitor their DMARC reports. Domains with properly configured DMARC records achieve better delivery rates, crucial for domain reputation and sender trust.
11 marketer opinions
DMARC adoption is growing due to increasing awareness of email security threats, the desire to protect brand reputation, and the rise of BIMI. It's becoming increasingly necessary for email marketing, with mailbox providers expected to enforce stricter DMARC policies. While adoption is on the rise, many organizations hesitate to implement a 'reject' policy due to concerns about blocking legitimate emails, preferring a gradual approach. DMARC reporting is crucial for understanding email handling and identifying issues. Failing DMARC authentication will likely result in email rejection, impacting deliverability. Starting with DMARC on new domains is easier than implementing it later. DMARC plays a vital role in domain reputation and maintaining sender trust.
Marketer view
Email marketer from LinkedIn user EmailSecurityExpert shares that DMARC adoption is being driven by the growing interest in BIMI (Brand Indicators for Message Identification). To use BIMI, senders must have DMARC in place, encouraging wider adoption.
6 Jul 2022 - LinkedIn
Marketer view
Email marketer from ReturnPath (now Validity) stated that the expectation is DMARC becomes critical for managing and protecting domain reputation, ensuring that only legitimate emails are delivered and maintaining sender trust.
23 Aug 2023 - ReturnPath
5 expert opinions
DMARC adoption is considered vital for improving email security and protecting against phishing attacks. While not a mandatory requirement in the foreseeable future, aligning with SPF and DKIM for DMARC readiness is seen as a best practice. Cost and complexity in implementation are significant barriers to wider adoption, often requiring changes to existing business processes. Domains with correctly configured DMARC records passing alignment checks are more likely to experience better delivery rates, emphasizing the benefits of full adoption. Starting a new domain with DMARC in place is easier than retrofitting an existing one.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks shares that starting from scratch is easy compared to trying to work out all the folks legitimately sending your mail.
2 Jun 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks shares that Google announced they would be moving all their mail to p=reject in 2016 and then didn’t, indicating that DMARC is unlikely to become a requirement in the foreseeable future. However, she still believes that it is best practice for mail to align with both SPF and DKIM to be DMARC ready.
24 Aug 2023 - Email Geeks
5 technical articles
DMARC adoption is steadily increasing, protecting a significant portion of global email traffic. Implementing DMARC helps reduce phishing attacks and domain spoofing. Major email providers like Google and Microsoft emphasize the importance of DMARC for email security and anti-spoofing protection. RFC7489 defines DMARC's technical specifications and sees it as a future requirement for email security.
Technical article
Documentation from Google states that having a DMARC record is important for protecting your domain from spoofing and phishing. Google encourages all domain owners to implement DMARC to improve email security for everyone.
1 Sep 2021 - Google
Technical article
Documentation from Proofpoint (formerly Agari) reports DMARC implementation helps reduce phishing attacks and domain spoofing. They mention statistics showing a significant decrease in fraudulent emails for organizations that have fully implemented DMARC.
14 Sep 2023 - Proofpoint
Are DMARC records required by Mailgun and Yahoo?
Are DMARC RUA and RUF tags mandatory for compliance and what are their benefits?
Can DMARC reports be sent without RUA or RUF addresses?
Do DMARC and BIMI require p=reject to be present on the organizational domain?
Do Yahoo and Gmail require DMARC authentication for senders?
How can DMARC reports be enriched with user-level data for better domain enforcement?