What are the best tools and methods to measure email deliverability outside of campaign metrics, like GlockApps?
Michael Ko
Co-founder & CEO, Suped
Published 13 Jun 2025
Updated 16 Aug 2025
7 min read
Understanding email deliverability goes beyond just looking at open and click rates. While these campaign metrics provide valuable insights into recipient engagement, they don't fully reveal whether your emails are actually reaching the inbox, or if they're being diverted to spam folders, or even blocked entirely. This is where external tools and methodologies become indispensable for a comprehensive view of your email performance.
Many email marketers and deliverability professionals turn to dedicated services, often referred to as seed list testing tools. GlockApps, for instance, is a popular example of such a tool that helps gauge inbox placement across various mailbox providers. However, relying solely on one tool, or even this type of tool, might not provide the full picture needed to diagnose and resolve complex deliverability challenges.
To truly measure and improve email deliverability, you need to look at a broader set of indicators and employ a diverse set of tools and practices. This involves diving into technical configurations, monitoring sender reputation, and understanding how different mailbox providers (MBPs) perceive your sending patterns. Let's explore the essential tools and methods that complement campaign metrics and provide a more accurate assessment.
The holistic view of email deliverability
Beyond the immediate feedback of opens and clicks, true email deliverability focuses on whether your messages consistently land in the primary inbox, rather than being filtered to spam, junk, or promotional tabs. This depends on a complex interplay of factors that external tools are designed to monitor and evaluate.
Key elements of a robust deliverability measurement strategy include assessing your sender reputation, ensuring proper email authentication, and analyzing content for potential spam triggers. Without these insights, even high open rates can mask underlying issues that may eventually lead to significant deliverability problems, affecting future campaigns.
One fundamental method for gaining this insight is through seed list testing. This involves sending your emails to a predefined set of email addresses hosted across various mailbox providers. The results indicate where your email lands, offering a snapshot of your inbox placement rate.
The role of seed list testing
Many providers, like GlockApps, offer seed list testing services. Users generally find them to be a good benchmark for understanding where emails land and often appreciate their DMARC reporting capabilities. However, a common observation is that the sample size of seeds for major providers like Gmail and Yahoo can be limited, potentially leading to false negatives or positives. Despite this, they can provide a good directional read, especially for identifying non-inbox placement.
The true value of seed tests often lies in their ability to simulate how new subscribers, who haven't previously interacted with your emails, would receive your messages. This is because many seed services include both interactive and non-interactive seeds. When you interact with your own personal seeds (e.g., opening messages, clicking links), you inadvertently signal to Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that you like the content, which can skew deliverability results for those specific addresses.
Professional seed services
Wider reach: Access to a broad range of mailbox providers and filters.
Non-interactive seeds: Simulate the experience of new subscribers, providing unbiased data.
Automated reporting: Quick, consolidated reports on inbox placement, spam folder, or missing.
Potential limitations
Seed pool size: May have limited seeds for certain major ISPs, impacting accuracy.
Occasional inaccuracies: Can sometimes report false positives or negatives.
Self-managed seed lists
Full control: Ability to create as many seeds as needed across various domains.
Deep insights: Allows for direct inspection of email headers and raw message content.
Cost-effective: Can be set up with free email accounts, reducing tool costs.
Challenges
Manual overhead: Requires significant effort to maintain and monitor.
Interaction bias: Your interactions can inadvertently influence deliverability outcomes.
While seed lists provide a general idea of inbox placement, it's crucial to use them directionally rather than as an absolute truth. For instance, they are particularly effective in pinpointing issues with hosted providers, such as Proofpoint or Cloudmark, which might filter emails differently than standard consumer inboxes.
Essential monitoring beyond seed tests
One of the most authoritative sources of deliverability data comes directly from the ISPs themselves. Tools like Google Postmaster Tools and Outlook Postmaster Tools (formerly Outlook.com Smart Network Data Services) provide essential insights into your sender reputation, spam complaint rates, IP reputation, and domain reputation. For high-volume senders, these dashboards offer a more accurate representation of deliverability than any seed test can.
These tools are particularly important for understanding how your emails are performing with specific providers, which can vary significantly. For example, Google Postmaster Tools provides detailed spam rates and domain reputation scores that are direct reflections of their internal filtering systems. Monitoring engagement rate trends through these platforms is often a better indicator of health for Gmail deliverability than relying solely on seed tests, as some users have noted. More information on leveraging these tools can be found in our guide on improving domain reputation with Google Postmaster Tools.
Monitoring sender reputation
Beyond ISP tools, consistently checking your sender reputation across various monitoring services is vital. These services track your IP and domain health across different metrics, providing early warnings of potential issues. Timely identification and resolution of blocklist (or blacklist) listings are crucial for maintaining consistent inbox placement. You can learn more about this in our in-depth guide to email blocklists.
Being listed on an email blacklist (or blocklist) can severely impact your deliverability, leading to emails being rejected or sent directly to spam folders. Regular blocklist monitoring is a proactive measure that helps you detect if your IP address or domain has been flagged for suspicious activity, allowing you to take immediate action for delisting.
Technical foundations: authentication and infrastructure
Beyond reputation and content, the technical setup of your email sending infrastructure plays a pivotal role in deliverability. Proper implementation of email authentication protocols—Sender Policy Framework (SPF), DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM), and Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC)—is non-negotiable for proving your legitimacy to receiving mail servers.
Misconfigurations in these DNS records can lead to authentication failures, resulting in your emails being marked as spam or rejected outright. Tools that check your SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are essential for identifying and rectifying these issues before they impact your email campaigns. For a deeper dive, explore our guide on DMARC, SPF, and DKIM.
Example: Check your DMARC record using digBASH
dig TXT _dmarc.yourdomain.com +short
Ensuring that these records are correctly configured and aligned is a strong signal to mailbox providers that your emails are legitimate and not spoofed. This significantly boosts your sender reputation and, consequently, your inbox placement rates. For more on DMARC, visit the official DMARC.org website.
Record
Purpose
Impact on Deliverability
SPF
Specifies authorized senders for your domain.
Prevents unauthorized senders from using your domain, crucial for basic trust.
DKIM
Digitally signs outgoing emails to verify content integrity.
Ensures email hasn't been tampered with, builds sender reputation.
DMARC
Policy for how receivers should handle emails failing SPF or DKIM, and provides reporting.
Prevents spoofing and phishing, essential for brand protection and high deliverability.
By combining the insights from seed list testing tools with direct feedback from ISP postmaster tools and rigorous technical authentication checks, you gain a multi-dimensional understanding of your email deliverability. This comprehensive approach allows you to proactively identify issues, optimize your sending practices, and maintain a strong sender reputation, ensuring your messages consistently reach your recipients' inboxes.
Views from the trenches
Best practices
Actively monitor Google Postmaster Tools and Outlook Postmaster Tools for direct feedback from major ISPs.
Always set up SPF, DKIM, and DMARC for your sending domains and ensure proper alignment for strong authentication.
Use non-interactive seeds from testing services to get unbiased inbox placement data for new sign-ups.
Common pitfalls
Solely relying on seed list results from tools like GlockApps for Gmail deliverability due to limited seed samples.
Interacting with your own personal seed accounts, which can skew deliverability data due to positive engagement.
Neglecting to monitor blocklists (blacklists), leading to unexpected deliverability drops.
Expert tips
Combine various data sources, including campaign metrics, seed tests, and ISP feedback, for a holistic view.
Focus on engagement rate trends over time, as positive engagement is a strong signal to ISPs.
Prioritize fixing issues with hosted email providers and enterprise filters identified by seed tests, as they often have stricter rules.
Marketer view
A marketer from Email Geeks says GlockApps can be a good benchmark for deliverability, but its limited seed count for Gmail and Yahoo can sometimes lead to false results.
2023-01-31 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
A marketer from Email Geeks says GlockApps is a good tool for its price point.
2023-02-01 - Email Geeks
Achieving comprehensive deliverability
Measuring email deliverability effectively requires a multi-faceted approach that extends well beyond traditional campaign metrics. By integrating insights from seed list testing tools like GlockApps, leveraging direct feedback from ISP postmaster tools, diligently monitoring sender reputation and blacklists (or blocklists), and ensuring robust email authentication, you can gain a complete and accurate understanding of your email program’s health.