Suped
Summary
Determining Gmail spam folder placement rate is challenging due to the lack of a direct metric in Google Postmaster Tools (GPT). While GPT provides some insights, the spam rate it shows is based on user-reported spam, not actual inbox placement. As such, a combination of approaches is necessary. Domain and IP reputation are sometimes considered meaningless, and the focus should instead be on spam rates. Seed lists are valuable for testing inbox placement by tracking where test emails land across various email providers. Several deliverability testing tools, like GlockApps and MailMonitor, can automate this process and provide detailed reports. In addition to testing, improving sender reputation, authenticating emails (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), maintaining consistent sending volumes, segmenting email lists, and promoting high engagement rates (opens, clicks) are crucial for avoiding the spam folder. Understanding how different ISPs filter spam and utilizing feedback loops (FBLs) to analyze user-reported complaints can also inform deliverability strategies. Finally, maintaining consistent IP address activity, delivering relevant content, regularly cleaning email lists, and avoiding blacklists are essential for optimizing email delivery.

Key findings

  • No Direct Metric in GPT: Google Postmaster Tools does not directly provide the spam folder placement rate.
  • User-Reported Spam in GPT: The spam rate in GPT is based on user-reported spam, not actual inbox placement.
  • Seed Lists for Testing: Seed lists provide insights into inbox placement by tracking where test emails land.
  • Deliverability Testing Tools: Deliverability testing tools automate seed list testing and provide comprehensive reports.
  • Importance of Authentication: Proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) improves deliverability.
  • Feedback Loops: Feedback Loops help you see user reported spam.

Key considerations

  • Multi-Faceted Approach: Use a combination of methods, including seed lists, deliverability tools, and monitoring GPT metrics.
  • Proactive Monitoring: Regularly monitor deliverability metrics and respond to any issues promptly.
  • Continuous Improvement: Continuously work on improving sender reputation, email authentication, and list hygiene.
  • Relevant content: Consistently create quality and relevant content.
  • Feedback Loops: Utilize and understand data received from Feedback Loops.
What email marketers say
13 marketer opinions
Determining Gmail spam folder placement rate is a complex task, as Google doesn't directly provide this metric. While domain and IP reputation data from Google Postmaster Tools (GPT) can offer some insights, its relevance is debated. The spam rate in GPT is based on user-reported spam, not actual inbox placement. To gauge deliverability, marketers rely on a combination of methods, including inbox placement testing using seed lists and deliverability testing tools like GlockApps and MailMonitor. These tools send test emails to various providers and report inbox vs. spam placement. Maintaining a good sender reputation, authenticating emails (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), consistent sending volumes, list segmentation, and high engagement rates are also crucial in avoiding the spam folder.

Key opinions

  • No Direct Metric: Google Postmaster Tools does not explicitly provide Gmail spam folder placement rates.
  • User-Reported Spam: The 'Spam Rate' in GPT reflects user-reported spam, not actual inbox placement.
  • Deliverability Tools: Deliverability testing tools and seed lists are used to estimate inbox vs. spam placement across various email providers.
  • Sender Reputation: Improving sender reputation and authenticating emails are key to improving deliverability.

Key considerations

  • Holistic Approach: Rely on multiple data points (seed lists, engagement, complaints) rather than solely on GPT metrics.
  • Tool Selection: Choose a deliverability testing tool that provides comprehensive reporting across various email providers.
  • Authentication: Ensure proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) to improve sender reputation and trust.
  • Engagement Matters: Focus on improving email engagement (opens, clicks) to signal positive sender reputation.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks shares that domain and IP reputation data is meaningless from his point of view, so he ignores it and focuses on spam rate.
26 Jul 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from GMass Blog shares that you can use tools like GlockApps to run deliverability tests and seed list testing by sending your campaigns through them. You’ll then receive a report of how many emails went to the inbox vs. spam folder for various mailbox providers.
17 May 2023 - GMass Blog
What the experts say
2 expert opinions
Determining Gmail spam folder placement rate requires monitoring alternative data sources due to the lack of direct metrics. Experts recommend using seed lists to track where test emails land and implementing feedback loops (FBLs) to analyze user-reported spam complaints. Understanding how ISPs filter spam and responding to feedback from FBLs are crucial steps for addressing deliverability issues and improving inbox placement.

Key opinions

  • Seed Lists: Seed lists reveal where test emails land (inbox or spam).
  • Feedback Loops (FBLs): Feedback loops provide data on user-reported spam complaints.
  • ISP Understanding: Understanding ISP-specific filtering is essential.

Key considerations

  • Proactive Monitoring: Regularly monitor seed list results and FBL data.
  • Respond to Feedback: Address issues identified through FBLs promptly to improve deliverability.
  • ISP-Specific Strategies: Develop deliverability strategies based on the filtering practices of different ISPs.
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource explains that while a precise spam folder placement rate is difficult to obtain, monitoring seed list results and feedback loops (FBLs) helps gauge deliverability. Seed lists show where test emails land, while FBLs provide data on user-reported spam complaints, offering insights into potential issues.
16 Feb 2023 - SpamResource
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise shares that understanding how different ISPs filter spam and implementing feedback loops are essential. By analyzing the feedback received from ISPs, senders can identify and address issues that lead to spam complaints, ultimately improving inbox placement.
21 Feb 2023 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
While Google Postmaster Tools offers insights into email performance, it doesn't directly show Gmail spam folder placement rate. Instead, monitoring spam complaints, authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and reputation metrics can help infer deliverability issues. Seed lists are also a valuable resource, as they are collections of email addresses used to test inbox placement. Sending test emails to these lists and tracking where they land (inbox vs. spam folder) provides insights into deliverability rates across various email providers. DKIM and DMARC help verify the domain and prevent email spoofing, which can both improve email deliverability and reduce spam folder placement.

Key findings

  • No Direct Metric: Google Postmaster Tools doesn't directly provide spam folder placement rate.
  • Inference Through Metrics: Deliverability issues can be inferred from spam complaints, authentication status, and reputation.
  • Seed Lists for Testing: Seed lists offer insights into deliverability by tracking email placement in inboxes or spam folders.
  • DKIM Authentication: DKIM provides a method for verifying the domain name associated with a message through cryptographic authentication.
  • DMARC: DMARC helps prevent email spoofing by telling receiving mail servers what to do with messages that fail SPF and DKIM checks.

Key considerations

  • Monitor Postmaster Tools: Regularly monitor metrics within Google Postmaster Tools.
  • Implement Seed Lists: Utilize seed lists to actively test inbox placement.
  • Implement DMARC: Implement DMARC to prevent email spoofing and tell receiving mail servers what to do with messages that fail SPF and DKIM checks.
  • Authentication: Properly configure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records.
Technical article
Documentation from DMARC.org explains DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance) helps prevent email spoofing. Implementing a DMARC policy can improve email deliverability by telling receiving mail servers what to do with messages that fail SPF and DKIM checks, reducing the likelihood of spam folder placement.
13 Feb 2025 - DMARC.org
Technical article
Documentation from RFC-Editor explains DKIM provides a method for verifying the domain name associated with a message through cryptographic authentication. This can improve email deliverability and reduce spam folder placement by confirming the sender's authenticity.
25 Jul 2021 - RFC-Editor
Start improving your email deliverability today
Get a demo