Summary
The influence of X-Headers on email deliverability is nuanced and not definitively negative. While some experts suggest X-Headers can be a signal for spam filters if they appear more frequently in spam emails, many consider their impact minimal compared to factors like sender reputation, authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and content quality. RFC 6648 discourages the standard for adding them, considering it obsolete. X-Headers can introduce security risks like header injection if implemented incorrectly. When used for tracking or internal analysis, adhering to email standards and avoiding security vulnerabilities is vital. Documentation and community sources still provide guidance and tools for managing X-Headers, but a cautious and well-informed approach is crucial.
Key findings
- Limited Direct Impact: X-Headers generally have a limited direct impact on deliverability compared to core factors like sender reputation and authentication.
- Contextual Significance: If X-Headers contain elements disproportionately found in spam, they can serve as a signal for spam filters.
- Security Vulnerabilities: Incorrectly implemented X-Headers can introduce vulnerabilities like header injection.
- RFC Discouragement: The official standard for adding X-Headers is considered obsolete and discouraged.
- Useful for Tracking: X-Headers can be valuable for internal tracking and analysis, but should be implemented correctly.
Key considerations
- Prioritize Authentication: Focus primarily on implementing and maintaining robust authentication mechanisms (SPF, DKIM, DMARC).
- Maintain Sender Reputation: Prioritize building and safeguarding a positive sender reputation.
- Secure Implementation: Implement X-Headers with meticulous security measures to prevent header injection and other exploits.
- Adhere to Email Standards: Strictly adhere to email standards and best practices when configuring and utilizing X-Headers.
- Monitor Spam Trends: Stay informed about current spam trends and avoid incorporating elements commonly found in spam within X-Headers.
- Use Sparingly: Use X-Headers sparingly, only when necessary and with clear justification.
What email marketers say
8 marketer opinions
The impact of X-Headers on email deliverability is complex and debated. Some experts suggest that while X-Headers were considered in older spam filters, their influence today is minimal compared to factors like sender reputation, authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and content quality. However, X-Headers can pose risks if used incorrectly, potentially leading to header injection vulnerabilities. Additionally, while they can be employed for internal tracking, adhering to email standards and avoiding security vulnerabilities is crucial. Some sources don't mention X-Headers at all, focusing instead on broader deliverability factors.
Key opinions
- Limited Impact: The consensus is that X-Headers have a limited direct impact on deliverability compared to sender reputation, authentication, and content.
- Historical Relevance: X-Headers were more significant in older spam filtering systems but are less important now.
- Tracking Potential: X-Headers can be used for tracking purposes, but this introduces potential security risks.
- Overall Quality: Deliverability issues related to X-Headers often indicate broader problems with the email's overall quality and sending practices.
Key considerations
- Security: Implement X-Headers carefully to avoid header injection vulnerabilities.
- Email Standards: Ensure X-Headers comply with email standards to prevent triggering spam filters.
- Authentication: Focus on core authentication methods (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) as primary drivers of deliverability.
- Sender Reputation: Prioritize building and maintaining a good sender reputation.
- Content Quality: Ensure email content is relevant, engaging, and avoids spam triggers.
Marketer view
Email marketer from EmailToolTester responds that email deliverability is impacted by many factors, including but not limited to, sender reputation, authentication, content, and spam complaints. X-Headers are not mentioned specifically.
17 Feb 2022 - EmailToolTester
Marketer view
Email marketer from Postmark discusses best practices for email headers, focusing on standard headers like From, To, Subject, and Date, but does not specifically address X-Headers and their potential impact on deliverability.
30 Sep 2021 - Postmark
What the experts say
4 expert opinions
Experts generally agree that X-Headers can be a potential signal for spam filters if they are more common in spam than in legitimate emails. However, good sending practices and overall email quality are more important factors. Using X-Headers for tracking purposes carries risks, and it's crucial to implement them correctly, adhering to email standards and avoiding security vulnerabilities. Experts recommend using them sparingly and ensuring they don't open the door to exploitation.
Key opinions
- Potential Signal: X-Headers can act as a signal for spam filters if they are disproportionately present in spam emails.
- Good Practices Matter: Good overall email sending practices can outweigh the potential negative impact of X-Headers.
- Security Risks: Using X-Headers for tracking can create security vulnerabilities exploitable by malicious actors.
- Responsible Use: When used, X-Headers should be implemented correctly and sparingly to avoid negative consequences.
Key considerations
- Monitor Spam Trends: Be aware of elements commonly found in spam and avoid using them in your X-Headers.
- Prioritize Sending Practices: Focus on maintaining good sender reputation, authentication, and content quality.
- Secure Implementation: Implement X-Headers with robust security measures to prevent header injection and other exploits.
- Use Sparingly: Limit the use of X-Headers to only essential purposes and avoid unnecessary customization.
- Adherence to Standards: Follow email standards and best practices when implementing X-Headers.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise responds that X- headers can be valuable for internal tracking and analysis but emphasizes the importance of ensuring they do not violate email standards or introduce security vulnerabilities that spammers could exploit. Using them correctly and sparingly is recommended.
24 Jun 2022 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that using X-Headers for tracking purposes can present risks, especially if not implemented correctly. Malicious actors can potentially exploit vulnerabilities in custom headers to inject spam or phishing attempts.
23 Apr 2022 - Spam Resource
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
The documentation presents a mixed view on X-Headers. RFC 6648 discourages their use, considering them obsolete. However, tools and configurations from Microsoft, cPanel, and DKIM Proxy still support their use, providing methods for analysis, customization, and integration, particularly for DKIM signatures. This suggests that while best practices might discourage them, they are still actively used and supported in various email systems.
Key findings
- Obsolete Standard: RFC 6648 considers the standard for adding X-Headers obsolete and discourages their use.
- Analysis Tools: Microsoft provides tools to analyze X-Headers within email messages.
- Customization Support: cPanel provides methods for adding custom X-Headers by editing Exim configuration files.
- DKIM Integration: DKIM Proxy documentation details how to add a DKIM signature to outbound email messages as an X-Header.
Key considerations
- Weigh RFC Recommendations: Consider the RFC's recommendation against using X-Headers when designing email systems.
- Utilize Analysis Tools: Use available analysis tools to understand the content and impact of X-Headers in email messages.
- Proper Configuration: If using X-Headers, ensure they are configured correctly according to the relevant system documentation (e.g., cPanel, Exim).
- DKIM Integration: If implementing DKIM, consider the available methods for adding the signature as an X-Header.
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft explains how to use the Message Header Analyzer tool to get insights into the x-headers of emails.
6 Apr 2024 - Microsoft
Technical article
Documentation from DKIM Proxy shares how to configure the proxy to add a DKIM signature to outbound email messages as an X-Header.
14 Mar 2024 - DKIM Proxy
Are spam trigger word lists accurate and should I be concerned about them?
Are spam trigger word lists still relevant for email deliverability?
Can an email template trigger spam filters and cause deliverability issues?
Do secure HTTPS links improve email deliverability?
Does the X-Mailer header impact email deliverability in Zoho Campaigns?
How accurate are email spam testing tools and what are the alternatives?
How can I effectively avoid spam filters when sending emails?
How do ESPs manage IP pools and how does it affect deliverability?
What are spam trigger words and how do they impact email deliverability?
Why are my emails landing in spam even though they pass SPF, DKIM, and DMARC?
