The prevailing consensus across email marketing experts and documentation is that an email sender's reputation can indeed be permanently damaged by repeated cycles of massive sends and pauses, alongside other detrimental practices. Factors such as inconsistent sending patterns, neglecting list hygiene, sending unsolicited emails, ignoring recipient engagement, and generating spam complaints all contribute to a decline in sender reputation. As reputation diminishes, recovery becomes increasingly difficult, costly, and may ultimately lead to blacklisting. Maintaining consistent sending habits, practicing diligent list hygiene, avoiding spam-like behaviors, and actively monitoring sender reputation are crucial for preserving long-term email deliverability.
10 marketer opinions
The consensus from email marketing experts is that repeatedly engaging in cycles of massive sends followed by pauses, along with other poor email marketing practices, can lead to significant and potentially permanent damage to a sender's reputation. Factors like inconsistent sending patterns, sending to unengaged or purchased lists, ignoring bounce messages, and generating spam complaints contribute to this damage. As the sender reputation decreases, it becomes increasingly difficult and costly to recover, potentially leading to blacklisting and emails consistently being routed to spam folders.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Medium explains that email spam is a quick way to damage your email sender reputation. Email spam is generally defined as unrequested mailshots. Sending email without permission will cause a spike in spam complaints and will hurt your email reputation.
26 Jul 2023 - Medium
Marketer view
Email marketer from Neil Patel explains that poor email marketing habits such as sending to unengaged subscribers, using deceptive subject lines, and having a high spam complaint rate, will negatively impact your sender reputation over time. Repeatedly engaging in these practices can lead to a permanently damaged sender reputation.
13 Aug 2023 - Neil Patel
5 expert opinions
Experts agree that an email sender's reputation is crucial and sensitive to sending habits. While reputation repair is possible if acting in good faith, repeatedly engaging in practices like irregular sending cadences, neglecting list hygiene, and prioritizing short-term gains over long-term health can lead to significant, potentially permanent damage. Human intervention in reputation management can make recovery more difficult, and recipient mail services are less likely to forgive a low reputation sender. Documenting risks and managing client expectations are also crucial to protect deliverability.
Expert view
Expert from Spamresource.com shares that sender reputation is a critical and ongoing element in email. Irregular sending cadence and poor list hygiene leads to a lowering of the reputation. Long term this causes permanent damage that may take a long time to fix.
18 May 2022 - Spamresource.com
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks notes that people and companies often prioritize short-term gains over long-term health, and it's difficult to change their decisions.
20 Sep 2024 - Email Geeks
6 technical articles
Email deliverability documentation across various platforms (Google, Microsoft, SparkPost, AWS, RFC-Editor, and Cisco) emphasizes that sender reputation is critical for email delivery. Poor practices, such as sending spam, ignoring list hygiene, sending unsolicited emails, ignoring unsubscribe requests, and generating high complaint rates, negatively impact sender reputation. This can lead to filtering, blocking, blacklisting, and long-term deliverability issues. DNS information is also used to identify spammers. AWS actively monitors and may block accounts that repeatedly damage their sender reputation. Protecting your reputation and regularly monitoring it is vital.
Technical article
Documentation from Cisco explains that protecting your sender reputation is a vital task. Bad sending behaviour such as large unsolicited mailshots will cause blacklistings that can eventually be impossible to recover from. Monitoring your domain on blacklists should be a standard practice.
17 May 2023 - Cisco
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft shares that maintaining a positive sender reputation is critical for ensuring email delivery to Outlook.com and other Microsoft services. Senders who repeatedly engage in practices that harm their reputation, such as sending unsolicited emails or having high complaint rates, may find their emails being blocked or filtered, with long-term consequences.
24 Feb 2025 - Microsoft
Are IP warming services effective for improving email deliverability?
How can I prevent cold emails from harming my domain reputation?
How do email volume and volume fluctuations affect deliverability and sender reputation?
How do I warm up a new IP address for transactional emails?
How do soft bounces and unsubscribe rates impact Gmail sender reputation during IP warming?
How does pausing email sending affect IP reputation for warmed vs long-term IPs?
Is IP warming necessary for low volume email senders with a dedicated IP?
Is IP warming necessary when migrating ESPs to shared IPs, and what are the best practices?
What should I do if Microsoft blocks my IP address during IP warming?
What steps should I take to recover from a Gmail block and rewarm my IP address?