The overwhelming consensus among email marketing experts, community members, and official documentation sources is that inbox placement platforms (including email warming services and engagement farms) are generally *not* a good long-term strategy for email deliverability. While some acknowledge potential short-term benefits or niche uses (e.g., warming new IPs), the risks and potential drawbacks far outweigh the advantages. Key concerns include ethical considerations, the potential for detection by mailbox providers, legal implications, and the fact that these services don't address the underlying issues that cause deliverability problems in the first place. The recommended approach is to prioritize building a strong email marketing foundation based on genuine engagement, high-quality content, list hygiene, proper authentication, and consistent sending practices.
17 marketer opinions
The majority of email marketing experts and community members advise caution when considering inbox placement platforms (including email warming services) as a deliverability strategy. While some acknowledge potential short-term benefits, there's a strong consensus that these platforms are not a sustainable solution for long-term deliverability. Many believe they can be risky, bordering on unethical or even fraudulent, and that mailbox providers are increasingly adept at detecting and penalizing such tactics. The overriding recommendation is to focus on building a strong email marketing foundation based on genuine engagement, high-quality content, list hygiene, proper authentication, and consistent sending practices.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests that even if inbox placement platforms work as advertised, any benefits will be temporary unless the sender's practices are already good.
13 Feb 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from ZeroBounce suggests the foundation for email success starts with email verification of your list to remove invalid or risky email addresses. This combined with good sending practices will lead to better inbox placement.
22 Jan 2024 - ZeroBounce
4 expert opinions
Experts across various platforms strongly advise against using inbox placement platforms (including engagement farms) for email deliverability. They raise concerns about legality, sustainability, and the risk of detection by mailbox providers. These services offer no long-term benefit and can actively harm sender reputation by mimicking spam tactics rather than fostering genuine engagement.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks argues that inbox placement platforms will not provide a lasting benefit, as changing to your own audience changes what you're doing.
23 Dec 2021 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource states that mailbox providers are very effective at detecting inauthentic engagement, and using services to generate fake positive engagement signals will, in the long run, do more harm than good to your sending reputation. They highlight the importance of earning genuine engagement through valuable content and permission-based marketing.
27 Jan 2024 - SpamResource
5 technical articles
Email deliverability documentation from major providers like Google, Microsoft, SparkPost, Sendgrid and Mailchimp emphasizes the importance of building a strong sender reputation through consistent sending of valuable emails, proper authentication, list hygiene, and recipient engagement. While warming IP addresses may have a limited role, the documentation consistently recommends focusing on fundamental best practices as the key to long-term deliverability success, with no provider recommending email warming services or inbox placement platforms.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailchimp recommends that ensuring your email is properly authenticated, using a familiar 'From' address, segmenting your lists, and cleaning your audience regularly are all key components of a good deliverability strategy. Mailchimp does not recommend or mention warming services.
7 Jul 2022 - Mailchimp
Technical article
Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools explains that sender reputation is a key factor in deliverability. Consistently sending emails that recipients find valuable is crucial for building a positive reputation and avoiding spam filters. This cannot be bypassed by warming services.
1 Dec 2021 - Google Postmaster Tools
Besides Spamhaus, what blocklists are important for email marketers to monitor?
How accurate are email spam testing tools and what are the alternatives?
How accurate are seed lists for email deliverability testing?
How accurate are seedlists in deliverability platforms like Everest and Glockapps?
How accurate is SNDS and Google Postmaster Tools reputation data?
How can I accurately test and measure email deliverability and sender reputation?
How do I set up Braze with Validity/Everest seed lists?
How reliable are GlockApps deliverability placement reports and what are the alternatives?
What are the best inbox placement testing tools?