Suped

VerifyDMARC vs Fraudmarc

Choose VerifyDMARC for broad DMARC security features, choose Fraudmarc for a minimalist, core DMARC reporting experience.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
VerifyDMARC provides a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting and enforcement features. We found its capabilities extend beyond basic reporting, offering detailed aggregate and forensic reports that help us pinpoint email authentication issues and identify potential spoofing threats quickly. It is designed for those who need an expansive view of their email security.
The platform includes robust analytics, allowing for granular inspection of email streams and authentication results. We appreciate its ability to break down data by sending source, geographical location, and authentication status, which is crucial for managing complex email infrastructures and ensuring compliance across various domains.
Fraudmarc, in our experience, focuses on delivering core DMARC reporting functionality in a straightforward manner. It processes DMARC aggregate reports, presenting them in an understandable format without overwhelming us with too many advanced options. This simplicity can be a significant advantage for organizations primarily concerned with basic DMARC monitoring and compliance.
While its feature set may be less extensive than some competitors, Fraudmarc efficiently provides the essential data needed to monitor DMARC implementation. We found it effective for identifying DMARC compliance rates, authorized sending sources, and common authentication failures, making it a reliable choice for foundational DMARC management.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
VerifyDMARC offers an intuitive dashboard that, while feature-rich, manages to remain user-friendly. We found the navigation logical, allowing us to drill down into specific reports and data points with ease. The visualisations are clear, making it simple to interpret DMARC results and identify trends or issues.
Setting up DMARC records and configuring alerts within VerifyDMARC is a streamlined process. Despite the depth of its features, we were able to onboard new domains and adjust settings efficiently, suggesting a well-thought-out user interface design. It feels like a platform built for both DMARC experts and those newer to the subject.
Fraudmarc excels in providing a clean, minimalist user experience. The interface is uncluttered, focusing on presenting DMARC data without unnecessary complexity. We appreciated how quickly we could grasp the layout and locate the essential information, which is ideal for users who prefer a no-frills approach to DMARC reporting.
The onboarding process with Fraudmarc is notably straightforward. We found it easy to add domains and begin receiving reports, making it an excellent option for those looking to implement DMARC monitoring without a significant learning curve. Its simplicity allows for quick deployment and immediate insight into DMARC compliance.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
VerifyDMARC provides responsive customer support channels, including email and in-platform chat. We found their team knowledgeable, offering timely assistance for both technical inquiries and DMARC best practices. They also maintain a comprehensive knowledge base with articles and guides to help users navigate the platform and understand DMARC concepts.
For larger accounts or more complex needs, VerifyDMARC often provides dedicated account management, which enhances the support experience. We observed a proactive approach to helping users maximize their DMARC protection and resolve deliverability issues efficiently, ensuring a high level of client satisfaction.
Fraudmarc offers essential support through email, ensuring that users can get assistance when needed. We found their responses helpful for general inquiries and setup guidance. While perhaps not as extensive as platforms offering multiple channels, the support provided is sufficient for managing core DMARC reporting tasks.
The platform also provides documentation to assist users with common questions and DMARC implementation. We found the self-service resources helpful for understanding the basics and troubleshooting minor issues, aligning with its overall philosophy of simplicity and efficiency.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
VerifyDMARC is particularly well-suited for enterprises and managed service providers (MSPs) that require robust, scalable DMARC reporting and enforcement. Its extensive feature set, including advanced analytics, API access, and multi-tenancy capabilities, makes it an excellent choice for managing numerous domains or complex email ecosystems.
Small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) can also benefit from VerifyDMARC's comprehensive protection, especially if they anticipate growth or have stringent security requirements. While it offers deep functionality, its user-friendly interface ensures that organizations of all sizes can effectively leverage its capabilities for enhanced email security and deliverability.
Fraudmarc is ideal for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and individual users who need a straightforward and efficient DMARC reporting solution. Its focus on core functionality and ease of use means that organizations can quickly implement DMARC monitoring without requiring extensive technical expertise or a large budget.
While it can serve smaller MSPs with basic DMARC needs, large enterprises might find its feature set less comprehensive for complex, multi-domain environments that demand advanced analytics, custom integrations, or extensive compliance features. It is best for those prioritizing simplicity and essential DMARC insights.

How does VerifyDMARC compare with Fraudmarc?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering drawbacks, VerifyDMARC's extensive feature set might present a steeper learning curve for users new to DMARC, potentially leading to initial setup complexities. Fraudmarc, conversely, might be perceived as lacking advanced features, which could necessitate using additional tools for more in-depth analysis or comprehensive email security management.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

VerifyDMARC offers transparent tiered pricing starting as low as $1 per month with a free trial, while Fraudmarc requires direct contact for all pricing information.
Logo
Logo
Small
$1/month
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with VerifyDMARC or Fraudmarc?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions