Suped

URIports vs Palisade

Choose URIports for comprehensive features and transparent pricing, or Palisade for streamlined DMARC management.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers a robust suite of tools that extend beyond basic DMARC reporting. We've found their platform to be quite comprehensive, handling not just DMARC, but also other security policies like Content Security Policy (CSP) and Network Error Logging (NEL). This breadth of coverage is a significant advantage for organizations looking for a centralized security monitoring solution.
Their platform excels in data enrichment, providing valuable context with geocoding, hostname lookups, and WHOIS data, which helps us quickly identify the legitimacy of sending sources. The ability to filter out noise with configurable thresholds is also a welcome feature, allowing us to focus on critical issues rather than sifting through minor, irrelevant reports.
Palisade positions itself as a streamlined DMARC reporting and enforcement tool. While it may not offer the same wide array of policy monitoring as URIports, its focus on core DMARC functionalities makes it straightforward for teams primarily concerned with email authentication. We appreciate its emphasis on simplifying the DMARC journey from monitoring to enforcement.
The platform provides essential DMARC report analysis, giving us visibility into sending sources, authentication results, and potential spoofing attempts. It aims to make the complex world of DMARC more accessible, which can be beneficial for users who prefer a less overwhelming interface dedicated purely to DMARC.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We found URIports' interface to be slick and easy to use, as they claim. The dashboard provides a good overview of DMARC compliance and other policy reports, allowing us to quickly grasp the overall health of our email security. Navigating through the various report types and drilling down into specific data points is intuitive.
The advanced filtering and search capabilities are particularly useful when we need to investigate specific issues or identify patterns across different sending sources. While the sheer volume of data and features might seem daunting at first glance for a newcomer, seasoned email security professionals will likely appreciate the depth of information available.
Palisade generally offers a clean and focused user experience, which is advantageous for those new to DMARC or who prefer a minimalist approach. The platform emphasizes clarity in its reporting, ensuring that key DMARC metrics are easily digestible without unnecessary clutter.
Its strength lies in guiding users through the DMARC adoption process, often making recommendations or flagging critical areas for attention. While it might not offer the same level of customization or granular detail as URIports, its straightforward design reduces the learning curve and allows for quicker action on DMARC-related issues.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports provides tiered support, with basic product support included in all subscriptions and 'In-Depth Premium Support' available at their highest tier. Our experience with their basic support has been generally positive, with prompt responses to standard queries.
For more complex DMARC implementations or specific policy configurations, the premium support option would likely be beneficial, particularly for larger organizations with intricate email ecosystems. It's good to see varying levels of support tailored to different user needs.
Palisade offers standard support channels typical of SaaS products, including email and potentially in-app chat. From our perspective, their support team is generally responsive and knowledgeable about DMARC specifics, helping users navigate common challenges.
Given its more focused DMARC approach, support interactions tend to be concentrated on DMARC implementation, troubleshooting, and policy adjustments. We anticipate that most users will find their support adequate for their DMARC-specific needs, even if premium tiers aren't as explicitly defined as with URIports.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is particularly well-suited for a broad range of users. Small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) can benefit from its comprehensive features, especially if they anticipate needing broader email security policy monitoring beyond DMARC. Larger enterprises will appreciate the scalability, team access, and robust data retention offered in higher tiers, along with features like OpenID Connect for SSO.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), URIports' multi-domain management capabilities and detailed reporting make it an excellent choice for overseeing multiple client domains efficiently. The ability to expand domains and access detailed analytics for each client is a strong selling point for managing a diverse portfolio.
Palisade is an ideal fit for SMBs that are primarily focused on achieving DMARC compliance without getting bogged down by an overly complex platform. Its streamlined approach makes it accessible for teams with limited resources or DMARC expertise. It's also suitable for larger organizations seeking a dedicated, easy-to-manage DMARC solution.
For MSPs, Palisade could work for clients with simpler DMARC needs, where a quick and efficient setup is prioritized. While it may not offer the same depth of multi-policy monitoring as URIports, its ease of use for DMARC can be a significant advantage for rapidly onboarding clients and managing their DMARC posture.

How does URIports compare with Palisade?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When assessing URIports, a potential drawback is the sheer number of features, which, while powerful, could overwhelm new users not deeply familiar with all aspects of email security. For Palisade, while its simplicity is a strength, it might be seen as a limitation for organizations needing more advanced, multi-policy monitoring or very granular customization options beyond core DMARC.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

URIports offers clear, tiered pricing based on report volume and domains, including a free tier, while Palisade's pricing information is not publicly available and requires direct contact.
Logo
Logo
Small
USD 1/month (Sand tier, up to 10k reports)
Contact for pricing
Medium
USD 6/month (Pebble tier, up to 100k reports)
Contact for pricing
Large
USD 28/month (Stone tier, up to 500k reports)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
USD 110/month (Mountain tier, up to 2.5M reports)
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or Palisade?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions