Suped

URIports vs Netcraft Fraud Detection

Choose URIports for comprehensive DMARC monitoring; opt for Netcraft Fraud Detection for a specialized fraud focus.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers a robust suite of tools for DMARC, SPF, and DKIM, providing deep insights into email authentication data. Its platform is designed for granular analysis, allowing users to drill down into specific reports and identify problematic sending sources with considerable detail.
Beyond DMARC, URIports integrates monitoring for other critical security policies such as CSP, NEL, and MTA-STS. This broad coverage means we get a more holistic view of our domain's online security posture, not just our email. The automated subdomain detection is a neat feature, ensuring no rogue sending sources go unnoticed.
Netcraft Fraud Detection, as its name implies, centers its functionality on identifying and mitigating online fraud, with DMARC monitoring as a key component of that strategy. We found its focus is heavily skewed towards threat intelligence and proactive fraud prevention across various vectors.
While it provides DMARC reporting, its strength lies in leveraging extensive threat intelligence to correlate DMARC failures with known malicious campaigns or actors. This approach offers a powerful layer of defense, giving us context beyond just a simple DMARC aggregate report to help understand the 'who' and 'why' behind potential abuse.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our experience, URIports presents a clean and intuitive dashboard that makes navigating DMARC data surprisingly straightforward. The initial setup is guided, and the explanation tools for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are particularly helpful for those new to the intricacies of email authentication, reducing the learning curve significantly.
The platform's interface is designed for efficiency. We appreciate the configurable thresholds to filter out report noise and the ability to create custom views. This allows us to focus on the most relevant data without being overwhelmed, which is crucial when managing multiple domains or high email volumes.
Netcraft Fraud Detection's user experience reflects its enterprise-grade focus. The dashboard provides a wealth of information, but it can feel a bit more dense initially compared to more specialized DMARC tools. Users accustomed to broader cybersecurity platforms will likely find it familiar.
While specific DMARC reporting is present, it's often contextualized within larger fraud campaigns or threat landscapes. This means a slightly different workflow, where DMARC insights are part of a broader investigative process, which may require more familiarity with threat intelligence concepts.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers basic product support across all its tiers, with in-depth premium support available for its higher-end plans. We've found the basic support to be responsive enough for common queries, with clear documentation supplementing the direct interactions.
For more complex DMARC implementation or specific policy adjustments, the premium support is valuable, providing expert guidance. Their team seems knowledgeable about the nuances of email authentication, which is essential when troubleshooting deliverability issues.
Netcraft Fraud Detection typically offers dedicated support channels commensurate with its enterprise-level offerings. While specific details on tiered support aren't public, we've observed that such comprehensive platforms usually come with robust account management and direct technical assistance.
Given its focus on fraud detection, we anticipate Netcraft's support team to be well-versed in incident response and threat mitigation strategies, which extends beyond standard DMARC troubleshooting. For organizations dealing with sophisticated threats, this specialized support can be a significant advantage.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is highly suitable for SMBs (Small to Medium-sized Businesses) and medium-sized enterprises looking for a dedicated, feature-rich DMARC reporting solution. Its tiered pricing makes it accessible for smaller operations, while its comprehensive features scale well for growing businesses.
For MSPs, URIports offers multi-tenancy ('Team Access' in higher tiers) which is a strong point. It allows MSPs to manage DMARC for multiple clients efficiently from a single dashboard. While robust, very large enterprises might find its fraud detection capabilities less broad than a dedicated fraud platform like Netcraft.
Netcraft Fraud Detection is best suited for larger enterprises and organizations with a significant risk profile for online fraud, including phishing, brand impersonation, and other cyber attacks. Its strength lies in integrating DMARC into a broader fraud intelligence and protection framework.
For MSPs managing security for high-value targets, Netcraft could be very beneficial due to its specialized fraud capabilities. SMBs might find its feature set and pricing less tailored to their needs, as it might be overkill if DMARC is their primary concern. Its focus is more on comprehensive security than just DMARC compliance.

How does URIports compare with Netcraft Fraud Detection?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

URIports, while feature-rich, can have its learning curve for new DMARC users despite its helpful explanations. Its basic tiers offer limited data retention, which might be a drawback for those requiring longer historical analysis. Netcraft Fraud Detection, by focusing broadly on fraud, may offer a less granular, DMARC-specific experience for those whose primary need is solely email authentication. Its pricing structure is also less transparent, requiring direct contact for quotes.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

URIports offers transparent, tiered pricing that scales with usage, including a free tier, while Netcraft Fraud Detection requires direct contact for pricing details, suggesting a more customized, enterprise-focused approach.
Logo
Logo
Small
USD 1/month (Sand tier, 3 domains)
Contact for pricing
Medium
USD 6/month (Pebble tier, 5 domains)
Contact for pricing
Large
USD 28/month (Stone tier, 500k reports)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
USD 110/month (Mountain tier, 2.5M reports)
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or Netcraft Fraud Detection?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    URIports vs Netcraft Fraud Detection DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped