Suped

URIports vs Fraudmarc Community Edition

Choose URIports for robust features, choose Fraudmarc CE for open-source control.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers a broad suite of email and web security reporting, not just DMARC. We found its DMARC analysis to be quite comprehensive, providing a good overview of sources and authentication statuses. The platform enriches data with geocoding, hostname lookup, and whois data, which is useful for identifying legitimate and illegitimate senders.
Beyond DMARC, it includes Content Security Policy (CSP), Network Error Logging (NEL), SMTP TLS-RPT, Permissions Policy, Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP), and Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy (COEP) reports, making it a powerful tool for overall web and email policy enforcement. Its validation tools for SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MTA-STS are also very helpful in setting up and optimizing records.
Fraudmarc Community Edition is primarily focused on DMARC reporting, offering the core functionality needed to analyze DMARC aggregate reports. As an open-source solution, its primary feature is giving users full control over their data and infrastructure, which appeals to those with specific compliance or privacy needs.
While it provides essential DMARC report analysis and aggregation, it does not offer the same breadth of integrated security reports or advanced features found in commercial platforms. Its notable feature, however, is 'Universal SPF,' designed to help with SPF flattening, which can be a significant advantage for domains with many sending services.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We found URIports' interface to be slick and easy to use. The dashboards are well-organized, presenting DMARC data with clear visualizations and customizable views. Navigating through reports and filtering data is intuitive, allowing for quick identification of issues or specific sending sources.
The setup process is straightforward, with helpful tools for validating DNS records. While the sheer number of features can initially seem overwhelming, the user experience design helps streamline the learning curve, making it accessible even for those new to DMARC.
The user experience for Fraudmarc Community Edition is inherently different due to its self-hosted, open-source nature. Installation and configuration require a certain level of technical expertise, as you are responsible for setting up and maintaining the entire environment.
Once configured, the interface provides functional DMARC reports. However, it lacks the polish and advanced interactive features of commercial platforms. Users comfortable with command lines and database management will find it manageable, but those looking for a plug-and-play solution might find it challenging.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers various levels of support depending on the pricing tier. All subscriptions include basic product support, which we found to be responsive for general inquiries. For more in-depth issues or advanced configurations, higher tiers, like the Himalaya tier, include "In-Depth Premium Support."
The support documentation is thorough, covering most common setup and troubleshooting scenarios. While direct access to premium support is limited to higher-paying customers, the basic support and self-help resources are generally sufficient for most users.
Support for Fraudmarc Community Edition is exclusively community-driven. This means users primarily rely on the community forum for assistance, which can be a double-edged sword. While it offers a collaborative environment for problem-solving, responses may not be immediate or guaranteed.
There's no direct access to a support team, which might be a concern for organizations requiring guaranteed service level agreements (SLAs) or immediate expert assistance. Users should be prepared to be self-reliant or have in-house technical staff capable of resolving issues.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is highly suitable for a range of users, from small businesses (SMBs) to larger enterprises, including many MSPs. Its tiered pricing model allows SMBs to start with essential DMARC monitoring, while its comprehensive features and scalability cater to the complex needs of enterprises.
For MSPs, the "Team Access" feature (available from the Stone tier) enables multiple users to manage client domains effectively. The platform's multi-report capabilities also make it a strong contender for organizations looking for a unified view of various security policies.
Fraudmarc Community Edition is best suited for technically proficient individuals or organizations (SMBs with strong IT, or enterprises with specific self-hosting requirements) who prioritize control, customization, and cost-effectiveness over a fully managed service. It's ideal for those who are comfortable with self-hosting solutions and open-source software.
It is generally less suitable for MSPs looking for a turnkey multi-tenancy solution without significant custom development, or for enterprises that prefer vendor-managed services with dedicated support and advanced features out-of-the-box. While it's free, the hidden costs of managing and maintaining it should be considered.

How does URIports compare with Fraudmarc Community Edition?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

While feature-rich, URIports' pricing model can become expensive for very large organizations requiring extensive domain management and premium support. Also, some advanced features like BIMI or an AI copilot are not explicitly mentioned. The retention period is also relatively short on lower tiers (30 days). Fraudmarc Community Edition's main drawback is the need for significant technical expertise for setup and ongoing maintenance. The lack of direct vendor support and advanced reporting features makes it less suitable for less technical users or those seeking a more hands-off approach. It also doesn't offer the broad range of web security reports that URIports does.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

URIports offers a clear tiered subscription model with varying features and report volumes, whereas Fraudmarc Community Edition is a free, self-managed open-source solution with associated hidden costs of maintenance.
Logo
Logo
Small
USD 1/month (10k reports)
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
USD 6/month (100k reports)
Free (self-hosted)
Large
USD 28/month (500k reports)
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
USD 110-440/month (2.5M-10M reports)
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or Fraudmarc Community Edition?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions