Suped

URIports vs DMARCwise

Choose URIports for comprehensive security reports, or DMARCwise for flexible MSP options.
LogoCompare to Suped
LogoCompare to Suped
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We found URIports to be a robust platform, not just for DMARC, but also for a suite of other security reporting, including Content Security Policy (CSP), Network Error Logging (NEL), and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT. This broader scope gives it an edge for organizations looking for a centralized security monitoring solution beyond just email authentication.
Its comprehensive reporting includes advanced data enrichment with geocoding, hostname lookup, whois data, and abuse contact information, which we found incredibly useful for deep dives into suspicious activity. The platform also includes specific SPF flattening functionality, which is a great help in managing complex SPF records and avoiding the 10-lookup limit.
DMARCwise focuses primarily on DMARC reporting, offering a streamlined experience that covers all the essential aspects of DMARC implementation and monitoring. We appreciate its explicit DMARC record hosting feature, simplifying the setup process significantly for users who prefer to manage their DNS records directly within the platform.
While its feature set is more concentrated on DMARC, it effectively covers key elements like DMARC aggregate reporting, SMTP TLS reporting, and robust domain checks. The platform also offers unlimited email volume reporting across its paid tiers, which is a strong point for high-volume senders, ensuring that all data is captured without volume-based limitations.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports presents a slick and feature-rich interface that, while powerful, can sometimes feel a bit overwhelming for new users due to the sheer volume of data and options. We found that once you get past the initial learning curve, the dashboards become intuitive for navigating various security reports and detailed analytics.
The platform excels in offering configurable thresholds and custom views, which allows for a highly personalized reporting experience, reducing noise and highlighting critical issues. Setting up new domains and configuring DMARC records is straightforward, supported by their advanced DMARC explanation tool.
DMARCwise offers a more focused and, in our opinion, slightly more intuitive user experience, particularly for those whose primary concern is DMARC. The interface is clean, making it easy to grasp the DMARC authentication status of your domains at a glance.
We appreciate the straightforward navigation to key features like DMARC record validation, history, and weekly email digests. The process of adding and managing domains is simple and efficient, allowing users to quickly gain insight into their email security posture without unnecessary complexity.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports provides basic product support across all tiers, with an option for 'In-Depth Premium Support' available only for their highest tier, Himalaya. We found the self-help resources and documentation to be quite thorough, allowing us to resolve many common issues independently.
For routine inquiries, the basic support is responsive enough. However, for complex DMARC configurations or troubleshooting issues that require deeper expertise, access to premium support is limited, which might be a consideration for larger organizations or those with intricate setups.
DMARCwise offers email support and guidance across all paid plans, and 'best-effort support' for its free plan. We found their support team to be knowledgeable and helpful, providing clear answers and assistance with DMARC-related queries. This consistent level of support across paid tiers is a definite plus.
Their focus on DMARC means their support is highly specialized in this area, which can be advantageous when you encounter specific DMARC challenges. We felt well-supported, and the guidance offered was practical for improving our email authentication posture.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is particularly well-suited for organizations that require a broad security monitoring solution, extending beyond DMARC to encompass CSP and other web security policies. Its granular control and advanced data enrichment make it an excellent choice for enterprises that need deep insights and robust reporting across multiple security vectors. It is also suitable for SMBs who want to go beyond DMARC.
For MSPs, the 'Team Access' feature and expandable domain bundles in higher tiers offer some utility, but its primary strength lies in its comprehensive security suite rather than specific multi-tenant management features. It also has a competitive entry price for smaller teams seeking a rich feature set.
DMARCwise truly shines for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) and agencies, with its 'Pay-as-you-go' plan explicitly designed for their flexible needs, offering unlimited domains and dedicated features. Its straightforward DMARC focus and unlimited team members in Growth and Scale plans also make it a strong contender for medium to large enterprises looking to master their email authentication without getting bogged down by extraneous security data.
SMBs and even personal users will find the free and starter plans very accessible for basic DMARC monitoring. Non-profit organizations also benefit from special discounts, making DMARCwise a highly inclusive option for various organizational types.

How does URIports compare with DMARCwise?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Both URIports and DMARCwise are capable DMARC reporting tools, but each has areas where it could improve. URIports, while feature-rich, can feel complex for those solely focused on DMARC and has limited premium support options for lower tiers. DMARCwise, though user-friendly, has a more narrow focus on DMARC, potentially missing broader security insights that some organizations might need.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

URIports generally offers more granular tiers with a lower entry point for basic DMARC monitoring, while DMARCwise provides more generous domain allowances and unlimited reports volume across its paid plans, with specific MSP-focused options.
Logo
Logo
Small
1 USD/month (Sand tier: 10k reports, 3 domains)
0 EUR/month (Free: 1k emails, 1 domain) / 15 EUR/month (Starter: 3 domains)
Medium
6 USD/month (Pebble: 100k reports, 5 domains) / 11 USD/month (Pebble Plus: 100k reports, 5 domains)
39 EUR/month (Growth: 20 domains, unlimited reports)
Large
28 USD/month (Stone: 500k reports, 25 domains)
99 EUR/month (Scale: 100 domains, unlimited reports)
Enterprise
110 USD/month (Mountain: 2.5M reports, 100 domains) / 440 USD/month (Himalaya: 10M reports, 400 domains)
Contact for pricing (Pay-as-you-go / Custom)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or DMARCwise?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions