Suped

URIports vs DMARCAnalyzer

Choose URIports for technical depth, DMARCAnalyzer for enterprise-grade integration.
LogoCompare to Suped
LogoCompare to Suped
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports provides a comprehensive suite of features, extending beyond DMARC to include CSP, NEL, SMTP TLS-RPT, Permissions Policy, COOP, and COEP reporting. We appreciate this broader scope for holistic security monitoring. Their advanced DMARC explanation tool is particularly useful for understanding complex reports, and they offer robust data enrichment with geocoding, hostname lookups, and WHOIS data.
We found URIports's focus on detailed technical insights to be a strong point. Features like automatic subdomain detection, configurable thresholds to filter out report noise, and DMARC failure report encryption highlight a commitment to granular control and security. The inclusion of SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MTA-STS validation and optimization tools within the platform streamlines the entire email authentication setup process.
DMARCAnalyzer, now part of Mimecast, offers a focused and robust DMARC reporting solution. Its strength lies in its ability to quickly provide actionable insights from DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, helping users move to enforcement with confidence. We noted their intuitive interface designed to simplify the often complex world of email authentication.
Their platform effectively identifies email authentication issues, potential spoofing attempts, and provides clear recommendations for DMARC implementation. While perhaps not as broad in its scope as URIports for non-DMARC reports, DMARCAnalyzer excels at its core mission. They offer essential DMARC setup tools like SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and BIMI record checks, making it easier for new users to get started.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports features a sleek and user-friendly interface that we found easy to navigate, even with its extensive feature set. The dashboards are logically organized, providing quick access to critical DMARC data, historical trends, and detailed report analysis. The ability to create predefined and custom views greatly enhances the user's ability to quickly analyze specific data points.
For users who appreciate deep dives into data, URIports's interface is a boon. The search and filter capabilities are powerful, allowing us to drill down into specific sources, domains, or types of reports. While its comprehensive nature means there's a slight learning curve, the logical layout and helpful explanations mitigate this, making advanced features accessible.
DMARCAnalyzer offers a very clean and intuitive user experience. We found the setup process to be straightforward, and the dashboards immediately present actionable insights without overwhelming the user with excessive data. This ease of use is particularly beneficial for organizations new to DMARC or those with limited email security expertise.
The platform prioritizes clarity, offering visual representations of DMARC compliance and threat detection. While it might not offer the same level of granular customization as URIports in terms of report views, its strength lies in distilling complex DMARC data into easily understandable formats. The integration with Mimecast potentially adds a layer of unified management for existing Mimecast customers.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers basic product support across all tiers, which we found to be responsive for general inquiries and technical assistance. For users on their higher tiers, specifically the Himalaya plan, they provide 'In-Depth Premium Support,' indicating a tiered support structure based on subscription level.
Our experience suggests that their support team is knowledgeable, particularly concerning the deeper technical aspects of email authentication and the diverse reporting types the platform handles. The availability of robust documentation and tools within the platform also helps users self-serve solutions to common issues.
DMARCAnalyzer, being part of Mimecast, leverages Mimecast's established support infrastructure. While specific details on DMARCAnalyzer-only support tiers aren't publicly detailed, the Mimecast ecosystem generally provides comprehensive support options, often including dedicated account managers for larger clients.
We anticipate that support for DMARCAnalyzer users would be integrated into the broader Mimecast support framework, offering a professional and scalable service. For those already familiar with Mimecast's support, this could be a significant advantage, providing a consistent experience across their security products.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is highly suitable for organizations that require deep technical insights into email security and broader web security policies (CSP, NEL, etc.). Its detailed reporting, data enrichment, and advanced tools cater well to technically proficient IT and security teams. For SMBs, the lower tiers offer an accessible entry point.
While it includes team access for larger organizations, URIports also suits MSPs looking for a powerful tool with multi-domain management and expandable domain bundles. However, larger enterprises might find the 'In-Depth Premium Support' only being available on the highest tier a consideration.
DMARCAnalyzer is an excellent choice for organizations seeking a streamlined, enterprise-grade DMARC solution, especially those already utilizing Mimecast's broader security offerings. Its user-friendly interface makes it suitable for businesses that need clear, actionable DMARC insights without deep technical dives.
MSPs would find its multi-domain capabilities and ease of management beneficial for client portfolios. For enterprise clients, the Mimecast integration and robust reporting capabilities provide a scalable solution. SMBs might find the lack of transparent pricing a hurdle, potentially leading to higher costs compared to URIports's smaller tiers.

How does URIports compare with DMARCAnalyzer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When evaluating these platforms, we noted a few areas for consideration. URIports's lower tiers have a limited data retention period of 30 days, which might be restrictive for long-term trend analysis for some users. While it is feature-rich, the sheer volume of data and options could be overwhelming for less technical users. DMARCAnalyzer, on the other hand, lacks public pricing information, which necessitates direct engagement with sales, potentially slowing down the decision-making process for some. Its integration within the larger Mimecast ecosystem, while beneficial for existing Mimecast customers, could make it less flexible for organizations looking for a standalone DMARC solution.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

URIports offers transparent, tiered pricing that scales with usage, while DMARCAnalyzer requires direct contact for a custom quote, reflecting its enterprise focus.
Logo
Logo
Small
USD 1/month
Contact for pricing
Medium
USD 6/month
Contact for pricing
Large
USD 28/month (500k reports)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
USD 110/month (2.5M reports)
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or DMARCAnalyzer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    URIports vs DMARCAnalyzer DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped