URIports vs.
DMARC Visualizer in 2026
URIports
DMARC Visualizer
vs.
We tested URIports and DMARC Visualizer for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender connected. URIports gave us a packaged monitoring workflow with clearer reporting, alerts, exports, and hosted MTA-STS, while DMARC Visualizer gave us a self-hosted dashboard that worked best when an operator already knew parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana. Our verdict: URIports is the stronger ready-to-run DMARC reporting product, and DMARC Visualizer is useful for teams that want control over their own stack and accept the maintenance work.
URIports
Hosted DMARC and security reporting
Starts at
From $15 / year
Best fit
Teams that want hosted DMARC reporting with clear DNS checks and exports
In one line
URIports processed our three-domain setup quickly, separated known senders from failures cleanly, and added useful TLS, DNS, and blocklist monitoring around DMARC.
DMARC Visualizer
Self-hosted DMARC visualization
Starts at
$0 software cost
Best fit
Technical teams that want to run parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana themselves
In one line
DMARC Visualizer turned aggregate reports into usable Grafana views, but sender classification, alerts, retention, and handoff depended on our own configuration.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
TLDR: pick the operating model first
Pick URIports if
Best for teams that want hosted reporting without running the DMARC stack
Added the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain with clear DNS validation steps.
Grouped Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender into understandable report views.
Explained the forwarded mail SPF failure and spoof sample faster than the self-hosted setup.
From $15 / year
Pick DMARC Visualizer if
Best for operators who want a free self-hosted DMARC dashboard
Accepted aggregate report files and displayed authentication results once parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana were running.
Let us inspect raw provider patterns for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp without SaaS packaging.
Handled aligned SPF and DKIM cases, but unknown sender classification stayed manual.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
The third option for guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Buying criterion: guided fixes should turn failed SPF, DKIM, and DMARC findings into owner-ready next steps.
Buying criterion: automated issue detection and alert quality should reduce noise when forwarding and spoofing create edge cases.
Buying criterion: MSP workflows and published starter pricing should make domain handoff and budgeting clear before rollout.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
URIports
DMARC Visualizer
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report parsing, filtering, and drilldown depth.
Supported with hosted report drilldowns and exports.
Supported through parsedmarc and Grafana.
Supported with report analysis and guided review.
Source detection
Turning report traffic into recognizable sending services.
Strong for known providers, manual review for edge senders.
Partial, depends on operator mapping.
Supported with sending source identification.
Forward detection
Explaining SPF failure caused by forwarding.
Visible in failure drilldowns.
Visible, but explanation is manual.
Supported with issue context.
Spoof detection
Identifying unauthorized mail that fails authentication.
Detected the spoof sample in failed traffic.
Detected as failed authentication data.
Supported with spoof and failure detection.
Notifications and alerts
Useful routing when new failures or senders appear.
Supported with configurable monitoring alerts.
Manual workflow unless separately built.
Supported with alerting workflows.
Reporting
Recurring reports, exports, and stakeholder handoff.
CSV and JSON exports worked cleanly.
Grafana reporting possible with manual setup.
Supported with reporting and exports.
API
Programmatic access or integration path.
Supported for report submission and integrations.
Partial, depends on underlying components.
Supported for operational workflows.
Multi-tenancy
Separating domains, clients, and reporting contexts.
Partial, domain grouping is clear but MSP handoff is lighter.
Manual Grafana and infrastructure separation.
Supported for MSP and multi-domain workflows.
SPF flattening
Managed SPF record optimization.
Validation and optimization tools, not hosted SPF flattening.
Not included.
Supported with hosted SPF workflows.
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record hosting.
Reporting and validation, not hosted DMARC record management.
Not included.
Supported with hosted DMARC workflows.
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record hosting.
Not supported.
Not included.
Supported with hosted SPF.
Hosted MTA-STS
Managed MTA-STS policy hosting.
Paid tier support starts above entry plans.
Not included.
Supported with hosted MTA-STS.
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist or blacklist monitoring and reputation checks.
Supported through wider monitoring views.
Not included.
Supported with blocklist monitoring.
Automatic issue detection
Finding important changes without manual dashboard review.
Supported for monitoring events and failures.
Manual workflow.
Supported with automated issue detection.
AI copilot
Assistant-style interpretation and next steps.
Not supported in our test.
Not included.
Supported for guided interpretation.
DNS monitoring
Watching authentication records for changes.
Paid tier support starts at Pebble Plus.
Not included.
Supported for DNS monitoring.
Self hostable
Running the product in your own environment.
Hosted service only.
Yes, self-hosted open-source setup.
Hosted service.
Free trial/free tier
A no-cost way to start testing.
One-month free trial.
$0 software cost.
Free plan available.
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against a fixed editorial rubric based on the same 90-day setup, the same three domains, and the same sender and authentication cases. Higher is better in every row, and a score of 0 means the product did not support that capability in our test.
URIports scores higher on managed operations, while DMARC Visualizer scores where self-hosting matters
URIports earned stronger scores for onboarding, source resolution, alerts, exports, hosted MTA-STS, and policy movement because those workflows existed inside the product during our test. DMARC Visualizer did well as a free self-hosted dashboard for aggregate report analysis, but it needed manual work for sender naming, recurring reporting, support handoff, and alert routing. The gap was largest when we moved from looking at data to deciding what a team should change next.
URIports score
74/100
DMARC Visualizer score
25/100
URIports
74/100
DMARC enforcement
7.5
Customer support
7.0
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
8.5
MSP workflows
6.5
Alerting and integrations
7.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
5.5
Blocklist monitoring
7.0
Pricing transparency
8.5
Time to enforcement
8.0
DMARC Visualizer
25/100
DMARC enforcement
4.0
Customer support
1.0
Source resolution
4.0
Setup and onboarding
3.5
MSP workflows
2.0
Alerting and integrations
0.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
3.5
Feature set
Managed breadth vs self-hosted visibility
URIports has the fuller product feature set. DMARC Visualizer has the cleaner self-hosted core.
URIports covered more of the work around DMARC reports: source views, exports, DNS checks, TLS reporting, hosted MTA-STS, and blocklist or blacklist monitoring. DMARC Visualizer gave us the underlying visibility we needed, but automated issue detection and guided fixes should be buying criteria if the team wants the product to recommend the next owner action rather than just show the data.
URIports
Clear Microsoft 365 grouping
Unknown sender surfaced quickly
Mismatch case easier to explain
DMARC Visualizer
Self-hosted Grafana views
SendGrid patterns visible
Manual unknown classification
URIports handled our Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic as recognizable approved senders, then separated SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender into useful views for the corporate domain and marketing subdomain. The aligned SPF pass and aligned DKIM pass cases were easy to confirm, the SPF pass with visible from mismatch stood out in failure context, and exports gave us enough detail to brief an application owner without sending raw XML.
DMARC Visualizer parsed the same aggregate reports and made Grafana useful once the pipeline was running, especially for seeing authentication patterns by source IP and domain. We could identify Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp patterns, but the unknown sender needed manual labeling, and the DKIM pass on a subdomain required us to inspect the underlying report fields rather than follow a guided product workflow.
User experience
Packaged workflow vs operator control
URIports is easier for daily use. DMARC Visualizer is easier to bend if you own the stack.
URIports made the first week cleaner because DNS instructions, domain status, and report filters were already packaged. DMARC Visualizer gave us control over storage and dashboards, but onboarding meant configuring ingestion and maintaining the reporting path before the DMARC questions could be answered.
URIports
Three domains validated cleanly
Unknown sender stood out
Forwarding failure easier explained
DMARC Visualizer
Operator-owned dashboards
Setup needs infrastructure work
Manual sender notes required
In URIports, adding the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain took one focused pass through DNS records and validation states. The unknown sender appeared as a classification task inside the reporting flow, and the forwarded mail SPF failure was easier to explain because the pass and fail context sat near the sender and receiver detail.
In DMARC Visualizer, the user experience depended on our Docker, parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana configuration. Once running, the dashboards were direct and useful, but adding the three domains, finding the unknown sender, and explaining the forwarded mail SPF failure required switching between dashboard panels, parsed fields, and our own notes.
Support
Product support vs project ownership
URIports has a clearer support path. DMARC Visualizer leaves support with the operator.
URIports had the stronger support model for a buyer that needs setup help, DNS handoff, and escalation options. DMARC Visualizer worked as open-source software, but support expectations were tied to our own team, our hosting choices, and the public project rather than a managed onboarding process.
URIports
Clear DNS handoff
Enterprise onboarding path
Escalation expectations clearer
DMARC Visualizer
Operator owns support
No managed onboarding found
Retention work is internal
For URIports, setup support expectations were clear enough for a commercial rollout: the pricing tiers described product support, enterprise options named onboarding and procurement help, and DNS handoff was practical because the product showed record states. We still had to write our own internal owner notes for SendGrid and the support desk sender, but escalation and enterprise onboarding were understandable.
For DMARC Visualizer, support was an engineering responsibility. DNS handoff, mailbox ingestion, Elasticsearch retention, Grafana access, and escalation all belonged to the operator, which is acceptable for a technical team but harder for an enterprise program that needs accountable setup help and a documented support route.
Suitability
Hosted buyer vs technical operator
URIports suits hosted DMARC operations. DMARC Visualizer suits teams that want to operate their own reporting stack.
URIports fits SMB and enterprise teams that want packaged reporting, monitored domains, exports, and a clearer path toward enforcement. DMARC Visualizer fits technical teams that value self-hosting over packaged workflow. For MSPs or teams handling many domains, account separation, alert quality, recurring reporting, and clean client handoff should weigh heavily in the buying decision.
URIports
Good domain grouping
Enterprise fit is clearer
MSP handoff needs process
DMARC Visualizer
Best for operators
Manual client separation
Recurring reports need setup
URIports gave us better account and domain organization for the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain, with recurring report material that was easier to share with non-specialists. For MSP-style work, it was useful but not perfect: client grouping and handoff notes still needed process around the product, especially when explaining the unknown sender and the support desk sender.
DMARC Visualizer worked best as a technical SMB or internal engineering tool, not as a managed client-facing product. Account separation, recurring reporting, and client handoff all depended on how we configured Grafana, folders, permissions, screenshots, and external notes, so an MSP would need to build a service layer around it.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
URIports
A hosted product for teams that want DMARC work to move each week
After 90 days, URIports felt like a DMARC reporting product that wants the operator to get through review quickly. We could open the corporate domain, check Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace alignment, inspect SendGrid and Mailchimp patterns, and export evidence for owner follow-up without rebuilding the workflow ourselves.
The strongest practical difference appeared when we moved from data review to decisions. The parked domain made the spoof sample obvious, the forwarded mail SPF failure had enough context for a non-specialist explanation, and the unknown sender became an action item instead of another raw report row.
Where it wins
Quick three-domain onboarding
Useful failure drilldowns
Clear exports for handoff
Hosted MTA-STS on paid tiers
Where it lags
SPF hosting was not included
MSP workflow needs more structure
Advanced capabilities sit behind tiers
Some sender ownership stayed manual
Pricing
From $15 / year
Free tier
One-month free trial
Onboarding
Fast hosted setup
G2 rating
0 / 5
DMARC Visualizer
A self-hosted dashboard for teams that want control and accept upkeep
After 90 days, DMARC Visualizer felt useful when we treated it as an engineering-owned reporting stack. Parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana gave us real visibility into aggregate reports, and the dashboards were enough to confirm aligned SPF, aligned DKIM, and provider-level traffic patterns.
The tradeoff was operational load. We had to own mailbox ingestion, retention, dashboard permissions, sender naming, alert gaps, and the handoff notes for the unknown sender, forwarded mail SPF failure, and unauthorized spoof sample.
Where it wins
No software subscription cost
Self-hosted data control
Useful Grafana inspection
Flexible retention by infrastructure
Where it lags
No managed support found
No built-in alert workflow
Manual sender classification
No hosted DNS capabilities
Pricing
$0 software cost
Free tier
Free self-hosted software
Onboarding
Infrastructure required
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
URIports
DMARC Visualizer
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$15 / year
Sand covers 3 monitored domains and 10,000 reports per month for personal use.
$0
Software is free, but hosting, storage, and maintenance are not included.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$7 / month
Pebble covers 5 monitored domains and 100,000 reports per month.
$0
No published usage limit, with capacity controlled by your infrastructure.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$33 / month
Stone covers 25 monitored domains and 500,000 reports per month, so report volume should be checked.
$0
Software cost remains zero, but Elasticsearch storage and retention planning become material.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Custom
Enterprise options cover custom quotas, retention, onboarding, procurement, and invoice needs.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No commercial enterprise subscription or managed support package was found.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
URIports prices are public list prices checked as of May 15, 2026, with the large segment mapped to the closest public tier and report-volume fit estimated because URIports prices by received reports rather than sent emails. DMARC Visualizer has a $0 public software cost, while infrastructure and staff time are estimates owned by the operator.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Turn failures into fixes
URIports surfaced the spoof sample and forwarding failure, but some sender ownership still needed manual notes. Suped's workflow is built to connect failed authentication findings to guided owner actions.
Reduce self-hosting work
DMARC Visualizer required us to maintain ingestion, Elasticsearch retention, Grafana access, and alert routing. Suped keeps those reporting operations inside a hosted product for teams that do not want to run that stack.
Make client handoff cleaner
Both products needed extra process for MSP-style account separation, recurring reporting, and client handoff. Suped's MSP workflows are designed around multi-domain review, recurring communication, and per-domain pricing.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from URIports or DMARC Visualizer?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
