Suped

URIports vs DMARC-SRG

Choose URIports for comprehensive features, DMARC-SRG for self-hosted control.
LogoCompare to Suped
DMARC-SRG
Compare to Suped
Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers an impressively broad array of features extending beyond just DMARC. It processes all report types for web and email, including Content Security Policy (CSP), Network Error Logging (NEL), SMTP TLS-RPT, Permissions Policy, COOP, and COEP. This makes it a formidable tool for holistic internet security monitoring.
Beyond its expansive reporting capabilities, URIports provides robust SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MTA-STS validation and optimization tools. We found its advanced DMARC explanation tool particularly insightful, helping us quickly decipher complex DMARC records and report data. The automatic subdomain detection is a neat addition for preventing blind spots in your DMARC enforcement.
DMARC-SRG, on the other hand, is a more focused tool, specifically designed as a PHP parser, viewer, and summary report generator for incoming DMARC reports. It excels at its core function, providing detailed breakdowns of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, giving us clear insights into email authentication results.
While not as feature-rich as URIports, DMARC-SRG is open-source and self-hostable, offering complete control over your data. It provides essential DMARC reporting without the additional web security protocols, making it a lean choice for those who only need DMARC monitoring and prefer to manage their infrastructure.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports boasts a slick and intuitive interface that we found remarkably easy to navigate. The dashboards are well-designed, offering instant insights into DMARC compliance, threat landscapes, and domain health. The configurable thresholds and custom views help filter out noise, making data analysis efficient and less overwhelming.
Setting up new domains and configuring policies is straightforward, guided by clear instructions. The data enrichment features, like geocoding and whois data, are seamlessly integrated, adding valuable context without cluttering the user experience. Overall, it feels like a polished, commercial-grade platform.
DMARC-SRG's user experience is fundamentally different, reflecting its open-source, self-hosted nature. Installation involves setting up a PHP environment, a web server, and a database, which requires technical expertise. Once operational, the interface is functional and straightforward, presenting DMARC data in a clear, albeit utilitarian, manner.
The strength of DMARC-SRG lies in its simplicity for its intended purpose. It provides summary reports without the bells and whistles of a commercial SaaS offering. Users comfortable with command-line tools and manual configuration will appreciate the direct access to the data and the control it offers, but it's not a plug-and-play solution for the non-technical user.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers structured support tailored to its pricing tiers. Basic product support is included with all subscriptions, which we found responsive enough for general queries and minor issues. For more complex scenarios, higher tiers, particularly the Himalaya tier, include 'In-Depth Premium Support.'
This tiered approach means that the level of support you receive is directly tied to your subscription level. We appreciate the clarity, but it means that smaller organizations might need to rely more on documentation or community forums if their basic support doesn't cover an advanced issue.
As an open-source project, DMARC-SRG relies primarily on community support and its GitHub repository for issue tracking and documentation. Users looking for direct, dedicated support channels might find this lacking, as there is no formal support team or service level agreements.
Our experience suggests that resolving issues typically involves consulting the project's documentation, searching GitHub issues, or engaging with the open-source community. This model is ideal for developers and technically proficient individuals who are comfortable troubleshooting and contributing to solutions themselves.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is an excellent fit for small to medium businesses (SMBs) and enterprises that require a comprehensive, hands-off solution for email security and DMARC enforcement. Its broad feature set, including CSP and NEL reporting, makes it suitable for organizations looking for a unified security monitoring platform.
Managed Service Providers (MSPs) would also benefit from URIports's multi-tenancy features and centralized dashboard, allowing them to efficiently manage DMARC policies and monitor email health across multiple client domains. The scalability of its plans makes it a viable option as businesses grow.
DMARC-SRG is best suited for technically adept individuals, small teams, or organizations with specific requirements for data control and self-hosting. It's a great choice for those who want to integrate DMARC reporting into their existing infrastructure or who operate under strict data residency mandates.
While not ideal for MSPs due to its single-instance focus, DMARC-SRG can be a cost-effective solution for SMBs with in-house IT expertise. Enterprise environments might use it for specialized internal projects where a lightweight, customizable DMARC parsing engine is preferred over a full SaaS platform.

How does URIports compare with DMARC-SRG?

Logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering the drawbacks, URIports, as a commercial SaaS, can incur escalating costs depending on the volume of reports and number of domains. Its data retention is also limited to 30 or 90 days on lower tiers, which might be a concern for those needing longer archival. DMARC-SRG, while free, requires significant technical expertise for installation, maintenance, and ongoing management, placing the burden of infrastructure and security on the user. Its feature set is also more limited to DMARC report parsing only.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
DMARC-SRG

Pricing

URIports offers tiered pricing based on reports and domains, while DMARC-SRG is an open-source tool with no direct costs.
Logo
DMARC-SRG
Small
USD 1/month (Sand tier)
Open-source
Medium
USD 6/month (Pebble tier)
Open-source
Large
USD 110/month (Mountain tier)
Open-source
Enterprise
USD 440/month (Himalaya tier)
Open-source

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or DMARC-SRG?
Logo
DMARC-SRG
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    URIports vs DMARC-SRG DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped