SendForensics vs.
OnDMARC in 2026
SendForensics
OnDMARC
vs.
We tested SendForensics and OnDMARC for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender connected. OnDMARC gave us a clearer path to enforcement and hosted record management, while SendForensics made more sense when DMARC reporting had to sit beside campaign deliverability testing.
SendForensics
Deliverability testing with DMARC analytics
Starts at
From $49 / month
Best fit
Marketing teams that want DMARC visibility beside pre-send testing
In one line
SendForensics handled the three-domain DMARC setup, but we had to do more manual ownership work before moving policy.
OnDMARC
Enterprise DMARC enforcement
Starts at
From $9 / month
Best fit
Security and IT teams moving domains toward quarantine or reject
In one line
OnDMARC was stronger for enforcement planning, hosted SPF, and MTA-STS, while Suped is the compact third option when guided fixes and published starter pricing matter.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Pick SendForensics for deliverability testing, OnDMARC for enforcement
Pick SendForensics if
Best for marketing teams that already care about inbox placement
We connected Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace without waiting for a sales-led implementation.
SendGrid and Mailchimp appeared in DMARC reports, but owner tagging took manual work.
The parked domain spoof sample was easy to spot, while the forwarded SPF failure needed explanation outside the tool.
From $49 / month
Pick OnDMARC if
Best for IT and security teams that need a controlled enforcement path
Dynamic SPF and hosted MTA-STS made the Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace setup more complete.
The unknown support desk sender was easier to classify because source labels and investigation views were tied together.
Policy movement felt safer because OnDMARC separated forwarding noise from spoofing risk more clearly.
From $9 / month
Consider Suped if
Choose Suped when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Guided fixes should assign each failing source to an owner with a concrete DNS or vendor action.
Automated issue detection should flag the unauthorized spoof sample without burying it in daily report noise.
Published starter pricing and MSP workflows matter when multiple client domains need repeatable handoff.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
SendForensics
OnDMARC
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Turns aggregate reports into source and pass or fail views.
Included
Included
Included
Source detection
Identifies sending services and unknown senders.
Partial manual workflow
Clearer source labels
Included
Forward detection
Separates forwarding failures from true unauthorized mail.
Report clues only
Clearer investigation path
Included
Spoof detection
Flags unauthorized mail using the protected domain.
Included
Included
Included
Notifications and alerts
Sends operational alerts when new risk appears.
Basic alerting
Smart alerts
Included
Reporting
Exports and recurring views for review or handoff.
Advanced reporting on Agency
Included, export limits noted
Included
API
Programmatic access for reporting and operations.
Custom integrations only
REST API
Included
Multi-tenancy
Account separation for departments, clients, or business units.
Agency segmentation
RBAC and grouping
Included
SPF flattening
Reduces DNS lookup pressure in SPF records.
Not supported
Dynamic SPF
Included
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC records instead of manual DNS changes each time.
Not supported
Dynamic DMARC
Included
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF records for changing sender lists.
Not supported
Dynamic SPF
Included
Hosted MTA-STS
Managed MTA-STS policy and TLS reporting workflow.
Not supported
Included
Included
Blocklists and reputation
Blacklist and blocklist views plus reputation context.
Blacklist and blocklist visibility
No dedicated blacklist/blocklist workflow tested
Included
Automatic issue detection
Highlights likely problems without manual report review.
Partial, deliverability-led
Smart recommendations
Included
AI copilot
AI assistance for interpreting issues and next actions.
Not supported
Radar AI available
Included
DNS monitoring
Watches DNS state and related record changes.
Not tested
DNS Guardian on higher tier
Included
Self hostable
Can be run on customer-owned infrastructure.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
A no-cost way to start testing.
No free plan listed
14-day free trial
Free plan available
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against a fixed editorial rubric covering enforcement readiness, setup, source resolution, alerting, hosted record workflows, reputation coverage, pricing clarity, and operational handoff. Higher is better in every row, and a product with no tested support for a capability received 0.0 for that dimension.
OnDMARC leads on enforcement infrastructure, while SendForensics holds value for deliverability teams
OnDMARC scored higher where hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, policy movement, and support handoff changed the amount of work left for our team. SendForensics scored well on pricing clarity and reputation context, but the unknown sender and forwarded SPF case required more manual interpretation before we could assign owners. SendForensics also took a zero on hosted SPF and MTA-STS because we did not find supported managed-record workflows in the test.
SendForensics score
53/100
OnDMARC score
70/100
SendForensics
53/100
DMARC enforcement
5.5
Customer support
5.5
Source resolution
5.0
Setup and onboarding
6.5
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
5.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
6.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
5.5
OnDMARC
70/100
DMARC enforcement
8.5
Customer support
8.5
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
6.5
Alerting and integrations
8.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
9.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
5.5
Time to enforcement
8.5
Feature set
Breadth vs operating context
OnDMARC wins on DMARC infrastructure. SendForensics wins when campaign testing matters too.
OnDMARC covered more of the authentication stack in our test, especially hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, investigation views, and API access. SendForensics was narrower for DMARC operations, but it added inbox placement, previews, reputation, and blacklist/blocklist context that a marketing team will use outside pure DMARC work. A Suped buying criterion belongs here: guided fixes and automated issue detection should convert each failing source into an owner task, not just another report row.
SendForensics
Microsoft 365 mapped cleanly
Mailchimp needed manual ownership
Subdomain DKIM needed notes
OnDMARC
Google Workspace grouped quickly
SendGrid source labels clearer
Forwarded SPF failure explained
SendForensics gave us usable DMARC analytics for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace within the first reporting cycle, and it grouped SendGrid and Mailchimp once we tagged the related IPs and DKIM selectors. The unknown support desk sender took longer because the interface showed the source pattern, but ownership notes and the DKIM pass on a subdomain had to be recorded manually before the policy recommendation felt defensible.
OnDMARC had the broader feature set for the authentication cases we created. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were identified cleanly, SendGrid and Mailchimp had clearer source labels, the unknown support desk sender was easier to classify, and the forwarded mail with SPF failure was easier to explain without confusing it with the unauthorized spoof sample.
User experience
Testing console vs enforcement workflow
SendForensics is quick to start. OnDMARC is better once policy work begins.
SendForensics was easier to approach when we treated DMARC as one part of a broader deliverability review. OnDMARC had more screens and more terminology, but the workflow did a better job of keeping setup, investigation, and enforcement in the same path.
SendForensics
Three domains added quickly
Unknown sender required tagging
Forwarding case felt manual
OnDMARC
Setup checklist reduced misses
Unknown sender easier to classify
Forwarding explanation was clearer
Onboarding the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in SendForensics was straightforward, and the DNS collection steps were easy enough for a marketing operations user to follow. The weak point appeared after data arrived: finding the unknown support desk sender meant moving between report views and our own notes, and the forwarded mail SPF failure needed a written explanation before a non-DMARC stakeholder understood why it was not a spoof.
OnDMARC took more concentration during setup because hosted services, dynamic records, and investigation views add more choices. Once the domains were reporting, the unknown sender was easier to classify, the forwarded SPF failure had better context, and the policy movement workflow made it clearer which senders still blocked quarantine or reject.
Support
Self serve vs implementation help
OnDMARC has the clearer support model for complex rollouts.
SendForensics support was enough for basic DNS setup and product questions, but our test still needed internal notes for source ownership and escalation. OnDMARC was more structured for implementation, especially when we needed DNS handoff and a defensible enforcement plan.
SendForensics
Setup docs handled basics
DNS handoff needed screenshots
Escalation path less clear
OnDMARC
Implementation calls had structure
DNS fixes were reviewed
Enterprise handoff felt clearer
With SendForensics, we could complete the first DNS setup steps without a call, and that suited the corporate domain and marketing subdomain. When we asked how to hand off the unknown sender to an application owner and how to explain the forwarded SPF failure, the help material answered part of the issue, but our escalation path and final owner notes stayed mostly manual.
OnDMARC set stronger expectations around implementation help. The DNS handoff was easier to document, the support path fit enterprise onboarding better, and the review points gave us a cleaner way to discuss Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the parked domain spoof sample with security stakeholders.
Suitability
Marketing fit vs enterprise fit
SendForensics fits smaller deliverability teams. OnDMARC fits security-led enforcement.
SendForensics is the better fit when the same team owns campaign testing, inbox placement, and a small number of DMARC domains. OnDMARC fits better when domain count, hosted records, support handoff, and enforcement governance matter more than campaign previews. Suped's MSP workflow and alert-quality lens is useful here: buyers should check whether client grouping, recurring reports, and alert routing work before the rollout grows.
SendForensics
Agency segmentation helps teams
Recurring reports need setup
SMB pricing is clear
OnDMARC
Enterprise grouping is stronger
Authorization groups need care
MSP handoff needs planning
SendForensics made sense for SMB and marketing-led use because public pricing was clear, the Brand plan covered our first two sending domains, and the deliverability tools gave the same team more than DMARC reports. For MSP-style work, the Agency tier added segmentation, but recurring client reports and handoff notes still needed more setup than we wanted during the 90-day test.
OnDMARC was more suitable for enterprise and security-led teams because RBAC, unlimited users, hosted records, and implementation support matched how larger teams divide responsibility. Domain grouping and authorization groups took care, so MSPs and multi-department enterprises should test account separation, recurring reporting, and client handoff before assuming the workflow is ready at scale.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
SendForensics
Good for deliverability-led teams with a controlled domain set
After 90 days, SendForensics felt like a deliverability product with enough DMARC reporting for small teams that want one place to review campaign tests and domain authentication. Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp data arrived without major setup trouble, and the parked domain spoof sample was visible enough to act on.
The friction showed up when we needed to turn DMARC evidence into ownership. The unknown support desk sender needed manual classification, the forwarded SPF failure needed a written explanation, and moving policy required more internal review because the tool did not give us hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, or hosted MTA-STS.
Where it wins
Clear public pricing
Easy initial DNS setup
Useful deliverability testing context
Reputation and blacklist/blocklist visibility
Where it lags
Manual unknown sender ownership
No hosted SPF workflow tested
No hosted MTA-STS workflow tested
Less structured enforcement guidance
Pricing
From $49 / month
Free tier
No free plan listed
Onboarding
Fast for three domains
G2 rating
3.8 / 5
OnDMARC
Better for security teams moving multiple domains to enforcement
After 90 days, OnDMARC felt like a DMARC enforcement platform first. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were easier to validate, SendGrid and Mailchimp classification took less manual work, and the unknown support desk sender moved through investigation with clearer evidence.
The tradeoff was operational weight. The interface had more concepts to learn, pricing beyond Express was not fully public, and domain grouping needed care when we simulated MSP and departmental handoff. Once configured, the hosted SPF and hosted MTA-STS workflows reduced the number of DNS changes we had to coordinate.
Where it wins
Clearer policy movement
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
Better forwarding explanation
Structured implementation support
Where it lags
Public pricing stops early
More complex setup path
Domain grouping needs care
No dedicated blacklist/blocklist workflow tested
Pricing
From $9 / month
Free tier
14-day free trial
Onboarding
Structured, more involved
G2 rating
4.8 / 5
Pricing
SendForensics
OnDMARC
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
From $49 / month
Brand covers 2 sending domains and 100,000 DMARC reports.
From $9 / month
Express covers up to 4 domains and 1 million monthly emails when billed annually.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
From $49 / month
Brand fits this volume without add-ons.
From $9 / month
Express fits this volume, with a 14-day free trial available.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
From $129 / month
Estimated from Company plus five public extra-domain add-ons.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Essentials is the likely fit, but current public pricing is gated.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
From $349 / month
Enterprise starts publicly at this price before optional extras.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Enterprise and Premier are sales-led tiers with custom scope.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
SendForensics Small, Medium, and Enterprise use public list prices checked as of May 15, 2026. SendForensics Large is estimated from the public Company plan plus public extra-domain add-ons. OnDMARC Small and Medium use the public Express annual entry price, while Large and Enterprise were not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Source ownership
In SendForensics, the unknown support desk sender still needed manual notes. Suped turns unknown sources into guided fixes with owner assignment, vendor context, and a clear next action.
Hosted record gaps
SendForensics did not give us hosted SPF or hosted MTA-STS in the test. Suped keeps those record changes in the same DMARC workflow so teams can move policy without a separate DNS handoff loop.
MSP handoff
OnDMARC had stronger enterprise controls, but domain authorization groups and recurring client handoff still needed planning. Suped keeps client grouping, alerts, and recurring reports closer to day-to-day MSP work.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from SendForensics or OnDMARC?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
