Suped

Postmastery vs.
DMARC-SRG in 2026

Postmastery dashboard screenshot
postmastery.com logo
Postmastery
DMARC-SRG dashboard screenshot
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
vs.
We tested Postmastery and DMARC-SRG for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. Postmastery fit managed DMARC enforcement better; DMARC-SRG fit self-hosted reporting teams that accept more manual work.
Published 6 Nov 2025
Updated 11 Jun 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
postmastery.com logo
Postmastery
Managed DMARC enforcement
Starts at
Not publicly listed
Best fit
Enterprise teams that want guided review and support handoff
In one line
Postmastery helped us move the corporate domain toward quarantine with operator review, but buyers wanting guided fixes, hosted records, and published starter pricing should compare that requirement against Suped's product.
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
Open-source DMARC reporting
Starts at
Free, self-hosted
Best fit
Technical teams that want to run their own parser and database
In one line
DMARC-SRG parsed aggregate reports reliably after setup, but classification, alerts, and enforcement planning stayed with our team.
suped.com logo
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped

Pick Postmastery for managed enforcement, DMARC-SRG for self-hosted control

Pick Postmastery if
Best for enterprise teams that want DMARC review with human support
Grouped Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic into cleaner owner views during corporate-domain setup.
Separated SendGrid and Mailchimp on the marketing subdomain with enough context for a policy meeting.
Explained the forwarded mail SPF failure better than a raw parser, which helped support handoff.
Not publicly listed
Pick DMARC-SRG if
Best for technical operators who prefer open-source DMARC reporting
Parsed reports for all three test domains once mailbox ingestion, MariaDB, and cron were configured.
Made the parked-domain spoof sample visible in the failed authentication data.
Kept storage, retention, and deployment under our control without a vendor subscription.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Suped's product as a third option for guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Guided fixes matter when an unknown sender needs an owner and a clear next step.
Automated issue detection and cleaner alerts reduce the manual review needed after forwarded mail failures.
Published starter pricing helps smaller teams and MSPs budget before a sales conversation.
Free plan available

The differences that actually change your week

postmastery.com logo
Postmastery
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
suped.com logo
Suped
DMARC report analysis
How the product turns aggregate XML into usable domain findings.
Supported with managed interpretation
Supported by parsed aggregate reports
Supported
Source detection
How well the product identifies real sending services and ownership.
Supported with manual review
Manual workflow
Supported
Forward detection
How the product explains SPF failures caused by forwarding.
Supported through failure review
Raw evidence only
Supported
Spoof detection
How unauthorized use of the domain appears in the workflow.
Supported
Manual review
Supported
Notifications and alerts
How issues reach the team without daily dashboard checking.
Supported
Not built in
Supported
Reporting
How results are packaged for recurring review and handoff.
Supported
Summary reports
Supported
API
How easily results can feed operational systems.
Enterprise API
Not built in
Supported
Multi-tenancy
How well separate accounts, clients, or business units stay apart.
Account separation supported
Not built in
Supported
SPF flattening
Whether SPF lookup limits can be handled inside the product.
Not tested as built in
Not built in
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Whether DMARC record management is hosted rather than only documented.
DNS guidance only
Not built in
Supported
Hosted SPF
Whether SPF records can be managed through the product.
Not tested as built in
Not built in
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Whether MTA-STS policy hosting and TLS reporting are part of the workflow.
Not tested as built in
Not built in
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Whether blocklist (blacklist) and reputation signals are included.
Blocklist and reputation checks
Not built in
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Whether common DMARC problems are detected without manual review.
Partial policy alerts
Not built in
Supported
AI copilot
Whether the product includes AI assistance for investigation or fixes.
Not tested
Not built in
Supported
DNS monitoring
Whether DNS changes and record health are tracked.
Supported
Not built in
Supported
Self hostable
Whether the user can run the software on their own infrastructure.
Managed service
Self-hostable
Not self-hosted
Free trial/free tier
Whether a public free entry path exists.
Not publicly listed
Free self-hosted
Free plan available

Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10

We scored both products against a fixed editorial rubric covering enforcement readiness, setup, source resolution, support, operations, hosted records, reputation monitoring, pricing clarity, and speed to a defensible enforcement plan. Higher is better in every row.

Postmastery scored higher on managed enforcement; DMARC-SRG scored higher on self-hosted cost control

The scoring split followed the work we had to do ourselves. Postmastery gave us more help interpreting Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, the forwarded SPF failure, and the parked-domain spoof sample. DMARC-SRG had a clear $0 software model and full self-hosting control, but alerts, source ownership, DNS monitoring, and policy movement sat outside the product.
Postmastery score
61/100
DMARC-SRG score
26.5/100
postmastery.com logo
Postmastery
61/100
DMARC enforcement
8.0
Customer support
8.5
Source resolution
7.5
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
6.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
7.0
Pricing transparency
2.0
Time to enforcement
8.0
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
26.5/100
DMARC enforcement
4.0
Customer support
1.5
Source resolution
4.5
Setup and onboarding
3.5
MSP workflows
1.0
Alerting and integrations
0.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.5
Time to enforcement
3.5

Feature set

Depth vs control

Postmastery gives more enforcement context. DMARC-SRG gives more deployment control.

Postmastery was more useful when the question was what to do next with real senders and policy movement. DMARC-SRG was useful when we wanted raw parsed reports in our own environment. Buyers should treat guided fixes and automated issue detection as explicit criteria, because Suped's product addresses that gap when raw findings need owner-ready remediation steps.
postmastery.com logo
Postmastery
Postmastery screenshot
M365 and Google separated
Forwarding case explained
Manual owner notes helped
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC-SRG screenshot
Clean aggregate parsing
Filters by domain and month
Self-hosted source control
Postmastery gave us richer interpretation of Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic after the first DNS records landed. SendGrid and Mailchimp were separated into recognizable sending streams, the unknown support desk sender needed an owner note, and the forwarded mail SPF failure was explained as an authentication edge case rather than a spoof. The product was strongest when a human operator reviewed the output and tied it to enforcement steps.
DMARC-SRG parsed the same aggregate reports cleanly and let us filter by domain, reporting organization, and month. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were visible as rows rather than guided source cards, SendGrid and Mailchimp classification depended on our labels, and the SPF pass with visible from mismatch required us to read the raw identifier details. It felt useful for teams comfortable owning the analysis.

User experience

Guided review vs workbench

Postmastery felt easier for decisions. DMARC-SRG felt better for operators.

Postmastery reduced the amount of interpretation needed after reports started arriving, especially for the forwarded SPF failure and parked-domain spoof sample. DMARC-SRG gave us a direct view into parsed report data, but it expected us to know what each row meant and what action to take.
postmastery.com logo
Postmastery
Postmastery screenshot
Structured domain onboarding
Unknown sender owner notes
Forwarding explanation was clearer
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC-SRG screenshot
Direct parsed-report view
Manual sender investigation
Self-managed ingestion setup
Postmastery onboarding for the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain had more structure around DNS changes and approved senders. We still had to validate the unknown support desk sender manually, but the workflow made it easier to write a handoff note and explain why the forwarded mail SPF failure should not trigger a panic response.
DMARC-SRG setup took more operational work because we had to configure ingestion, database storage, cleanup, and access. Once running, finding the unknown sender meant filtering by domain and reporting organization, then checking SPF and DKIM result rows ourselves. The forwarded mail SPF failure was visible, but we had to supply the explanation.

Support

Assisted rollout vs community ownership

Postmastery is the safer support choice for enterprise rollout. DMARC-SRG depends on internal admins.

Postmastery fit teams that expect help during setup, DNS handoff, and escalation. DMARC-SRG has the advantage of source access and self-hosting, but our test made support an internal responsibility rather than a vendor workflow.
postmastery.com logo
Postmastery
Postmastery screenshot
Assisted DNS handoff
Enterprise onboarding path
Escalation expectations clearer
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC-SRG screenshot
Community-style support
Admin-owned escalation
Documentation-driven setup
Postmastery support expectations matched an enterprise DMARC rollout. DNS handoff steps were clear enough for our primary domain, escalation made sense when the support desk sender needed classification, and the onboarding path gave us a cleaner way to explain policy movement to security and messaging owners.
DMARC-SRG support was the open-source model: documentation, project artifacts, and our own administrator time. That worked for parser setup, but DNS handoff, production escalation, backup planning, and enterprise onboarding all had to be designed around the tool rather than handled inside it.

Suitability

Enterprise fit vs operator fit

Postmastery suits managed enterprise review. DMARC-SRG suits technical teams that own the stack.

Postmastery made more sense for an enterprise team coordinating domain owners and policy movement. DMARC-SRG made more sense for a technical team that accepts self-hosting and manual reporting. If an MSP needs repeatable account separation, alert quality, and client handoff, Suped's product is relevant as a buying criterion rather than a like-for-like self-hosted parser.
postmastery.com logo
Postmastery
Postmastery screenshot
Enterprise domain grouping
Cleaner recurring reports
MSP handoff needs work
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC-SRG screenshot
Good technical SMB fit
No native multi-tenancy
Client reporting is manual
Postmastery handled account separation and domain grouping better in our test, especially when we split the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain for different owners. Recurring reporting was easier to explain to an enterprise audience, but MSP-style client handoff still needed tighter repeatability than we wanted for many small accounts.
DMARC-SRG was a fit for SMB or technical teams that want a low-cost parser and can manage their own hosting. It did not give us native multi-tenancy, account separation, recurring client reports, or handoff notes, so an MSP would need to build those workflows around the product.

What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use

postmastery.com logo
Postmastery

A managed DMARC workflow for teams with enforcement owners

The primary corporate domain reached a defensible quarantine plan fastest because Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp were grouped with owner notes. The parked domain's spoof sample was easy to isolate, but the workflow still expected a knowledgeable operator to decide when policy should move.
Marketing subdomain review took longer when Mailchimp and SendGrid campaigns overlapped. Exports helped with support handoff, but we wanted clearer in-product explanation for the unknown sender before involving support.
Where it wins
Clearer policy movement for enterprises
Better explanation of forwarded mail
Useful support handoff exports
Reputation checks beside DMARC
Where it lags
Pricing was not public
Hosted SPF was not built in
Unknown sender still needed review
MSP handoff needed more structure
Pricing
Not publicly listed
Free tier
Not publicly listed
Onboarding
Assisted setup
G2 rating
0 / 5
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG

A self-hosted DMARC parser for technical operators

DMARC-SRG felt like a reliable workbench once mailbox ingestion, MariaDB, and cron were stable. The reports were readable, but every classification decision for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender stayed with us.
The forwarded mail SPF failure was visible, but the tool did not turn it into an explanation for a non-specialist stakeholder. The parked-domain spoof sample stood out in the failure data, yet alerting and policy movement had to happen outside the product.
Where it wins
No software subscription cost
Self-hosted data control
Clear parsed aggregate reports
Configurable retention cleanup
Where it lags
No built-in alert routing
No native multi-tenancy
Manual sender classification
No hosted DNS records
Pricing
$0 software
Free tier
Free self-hosted
Onboarding
Admin-led setup
G2 rating
0 / 5

Pricing

postmastery.com logo
Postmastery
github.com logo
DMARC-SRG
suped.com logo
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No public tier or volume band was available for this segment.
$0
Software license cost is free; hosting and maintenance are user-owned.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No public tier or volume band was available for this segment.
$0
The software has no published volume cap; server capacity sets practical limits.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No public tier or volume band was available for this segment.
$0
Database, storage, backups, monitoring, and admin time remain separate costs.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Enterprise pricing was not published.
$0
No paid enterprise tier or commercial SLA was published.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
Postmastery prices are not public and are marked as not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026. DMARC-SRG is listed as $0 software because its public project is GPL-3.0 self-hosted; hosting, database, backups, security, and admin time are estimated by the operator. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.

If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped

Suped dashboard
Guided remediation
Postmastery surfaced enforcement direction, but our unknown sender and SPF mismatch still needed expert interpretation. Suped's product turns common DMARC failures into guided owner next steps.
Managed operations
DMARC-SRG parsed reports, but ingestion, database upkeep, alerts, and DNS monitoring stayed outside the tool. Suped's product keeps those workflows in the managed platform.
Clear MSP handoff
Postmastery handled enterprise-style review better than repeatable client handoff, while DMARC-SRG had no native multi-tenancy. Suped's product supports account separation, recurring reports, and alert routing for client work.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Postmastery or DMARC-SRG?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.

Frequently asked questions

Here's why customers love Suped for DMARC monitoring

MONEYME cover

How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped

See how MONEYME uses Suped
Jam Cyber cover

How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped

See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
DigiBean cover

How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients

See how DigiBean uses Suped
Alliance Group cover

How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped

See how Alliance Group uses Suped
Maaser cover

How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement

See how Maaser uses Suped
G2 LeaderG2 Users Most Likely To RecommendG2 Easiest To Do Business WithG2 High PerformerG2 Best Estimated ROI
DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard
What you'll get with Suped
Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing