Suped

Palisade vs Netcraft Fraud Detection

Choose Palisade for robust policy enforcement, or Netcraft for advanced threat intelligence.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade provides a comprehensive suite for DMARC reporting, offering a detailed view into email authentication results. We find its interface for aggregating DMARC XML reports to be efficient, presenting data in an easily digestible format. It excels at identifying legitimate sending sources and distinguishing them from potential spoofs, giving us a clear picture of our email ecosystem.
The platform's strength lies in its ability to dissect DMARC data, helping us to achieve enforcement policies (p=reject) with confidence. We appreciate its robust filtering capabilities, which allow us to zoom in on specific issues, such as misconfigured SPF or DKIM records, enabling quick remediation without wading through unnecessary noise.
Netcraft Fraud Detection, while also a DMARC reporting tool, brings a strong focus on threat intelligence and the proactive identification of malicious activity. Its DMARC analysis is solid, but we noticed a distinct emphasis on uncovering phishing and spoofing campaigns, often linking DMARC failures to broader fraud attempts.
The tool integrates DMARC data with a wider threat landscape, providing context around identified abuse. We found its ability to cross-reference DMARC reports with known bad actors or suspicious IPs particularly valuable. This allows us to not just see authentication failures, but to understand the potential malicious intent behind them, which is crucial for organizations facing persistent brand impersonation threats.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade's user experience is generally straightforward. The dashboard is well-organized, making it easy to navigate through DMARC reports, SPF and DKIM alignment, and identified sending sources. We found the initial setup process to be relatively smooth, with clear guidance for DNS record configuration.
However, for very large and complex email environments, the sheer volume of data can sometimes feel a little overwhelming, requiring some time to master its advanced filtering and reporting features. While powerful, some advanced functionalities could benefit from more intuitive placement or clearer explanations within the interface itself.
Netcraft Fraud Detection offers a more specialized user experience, tailored for security professionals deeply focused on preventing fraud. The interface reflects this, presenting DMARC data alongside threat intelligence indicators. For those accustomed to security operations centers (SOC) tools, the layout will feel familiar.
While powerful in its fraud-centric approach, the broader security context can sometimes make it less intuitive for users primarily interested in basic DMARC compliance. New users might find the initial learning curve a bit steeper than other DMARC-focused tools, as it expects a certain level of familiarity with threat analysis concepts.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade offers competent support, primarily through email and a ticketing system. We've found their responses to be thorough and helpful when addressing specific DMARC configuration challenges or data interpretation questions. Documentation is generally good, covering most standard use cases and troubleshooting steps.
For advanced or highly technical queries, we sometimes experienced a slightly longer turnaround time, but the quality of the resolution was consistently high. They provide enough resources for self-help, which is a definite plus, allowing us to find answers to common questions independently.
Netcraft Fraud Detection provides support that aligns with its focus on security, often involving direct interaction with security analysts when dealing with complex fraud cases. Their team is knowledgeable, particularly when it comes to leveraging DMARC data for threat intelligence.
While their expertise is undeniable, the support channels feel more geared towards enterprise clients with dedicated account managers. We found that for quick, basic DMARC questions, the process might be less streamlined than with other providers. However, when a real email security incident arises, their specialized knowledge is invaluable.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade is highly suitable for organizations of various sizes looking for a robust and reliable DMARC reporting and enforcement solution. For SMBs, its clear interface helps demystify DMARC, making it accessible even without deep email security expertise. We found it effectively guides users toward a p=reject policy.
For enterprise clients and MSPs, Palisade offers the necessary granularity and reporting capabilities to manage large, complex email infrastructures and multiple client domains. Its scalability and detailed insights into authentication failures make it a strong contender for those prioritizing comprehensive DMARC management and compliance across a broad portfolio.
Netcraft Fraud Detection is best suited for medium to large enterprises, particularly those in industries frequently targeted by phishing and brand impersonation, such as finance or e-commerce. Its advanced threat intelligence capabilities make it a formidable tool for security teams focused on proactive fraud detection and takedowns. For SMBs, its specialized focus might be overkill.
MSPs serving clients with high security requirements or those managing digital risk would find Netcraft Fraud Detection's features beneficial. It’s an ideal choice for organizations that view DMARC not just as an email authentication standard, but as a critical component of their broader cybersecurity and anti-fraud strategy, where connecting DMARC failures to real-world threats is paramount.

How does Palisade compare with Netcraft Fraud Detection?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Palisade provides a solid DMARC reporting experience, but its reporting interface can feel a bit traditional compared to more modern tools. Netcraft Fraud Detection, while powerful for threat intelligence, may have a steeper learning curve for teams not solely focused on fraud, and its pricing model might not be as transparent.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Both Palisade and Netcraft Fraud Detection require direct contact for pricing information, making it difficult to compare costs directly without engaging their sales teams.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Palisade or Netcraft Fraud Detection?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions