Palisade offers a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting and management features. We found its platform to be quite robust, providing granular insights into email authentication results, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC failures, all presented in an digestible format.
Beyond core DMARC, Palisade extends its capabilities with advanced features like SPF flattening, MTA-STS and TLS-RPT configuration guidance, and detailed forensic reports. It's designed for organizations that need deep visibility and control over their email security posture.
Fraudmarc focuses primarily on core DMARC reporting and enforcement. We appreciate its straightforward approach to aggregating and presenting DMARC data, making it easy to identify legitimate email sources and potential spoofing attempts.
While it may not offer the same breadth of advanced tools as some competitors, Fraudmarc covers all essential DMARC compliance requirements. Its strength lies in providing a solid, reliable foundation for DMARC implementation without overwhelming users with excessive features.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Palisade's user interface is professional and feature-rich, offering extensive customization options for dashboards and reports. For those familiar with email security, navigation is intuitive, allowing for quick access to detailed data and configuration settings.
However, the sheer depth of features means there can be a slight learning curve for new users, especially those less experienced with complex email authentication protocols. Once accustomed, we found the powerful filtering and visualization tools to be highly effective.
Fraudmarc excels in user-friendliness, offering a clean and uncluttered interface that prioritizes ease of use. Setting up DMARC records and monitoring reports is straightforward, making it an excellent choice for users who want to get started quickly.
The dashboards provide clear, actionable insights without unnecessary complexity. We found that even users with minimal DMARC experience could easily understand their email traffic patterns and progress towards DMARC enforcement.
Which product has the best support
Support
Palisade provides robust support channels, typically including email, phone, and a knowledge base. For enterprise clients, we experienced dedicated account management and more personalized assistance, which is crucial when dealing with complex deployment scenarios.
Their documentation is extensive, covering intricate aspects of DMARC and related protocols. While response times can vary depending on the severity of the issue, we generally found their support team to be knowledgeable and capable of handling advanced queries.
Fraudmarc offers responsive customer support, primarily through email and a well-organized FAQ section. Their team is quick to answer basic DMARC questions and help with initial setup, reflecting their focus on a streamlined user experience.
For more advanced configurations or troubleshooting, we sometimes found that the support was more geared towards general guidance rather than deep technical diving. However, for most users, their assistance is perfectly adequate and helpful.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Palisade is an excellent fit for larger enterprises and managed service providers (MSPs) handling multiple client domains. Its extensive feature set, detailed reporting, and multi-tenancy capabilities make it ideal for environments requiring deep insights and scalable management.
For small to medium businesses (SMBs), Palisade might offer more functionality than immediately needed, potentially leading to higher costs and a steeper learning curve. However, for SMBs with a strong focus on email security and growth, it provides a powerful platform.
Fraudmarc is highly suitable for SMBs and organizations that need a straightforward, effective DMARC reporting solution without excessive complexity. Its ease of use and focused feature set allows for quick implementation and monitoring of email authentication.
For larger enterprises and MSPs, Fraudmarc might require supplementing with other tools if highly advanced features like extensive blocklist monitoring or bespoke API integrations are critical. It offers solid DMARC protection but with a simpler approach.
How does Palisade compare with Fraudmarc?
DMARC report analysis
Aggregating and interpreting DMARC aggregate reports.
Source detection
Identifying legitimate and unauthorized email sending sources.
Forward detection
Insight into email forwarding issues that affect DMARC alignment.
Spoof detection
Pinpointing attempts to send emails fraudulently using your domain.
Notifications and alerts
Automated alerts for DMARC failures or policy changes.
Reporting
Customizable reports and data visualization.
Advanced, customizable reports with deep insights.
Clear, concise reports focusing on DMARC core data.
API
Programmatic access to DMARC data and management features.
Comprehensive API for integration and automation.
Basic API for essential data retrieval.
Multi-tenancy
Managing multiple domains or client accounts from a single interface.
SPF flattening
Mechanism to simplify complex SPF records to avoid lookup limits.
Hosted DMARC
Managing DMARC records on behalf of the user.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security and TLS Reporting.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring email sending reputation and blocklist (blacklist) status.
Advanced monitoring of various blocklists.
Basic blocklist (blacklist) reputation checks.
AI copilot
AI-powered assistant for DMARC analysis and recommendations.
DNS monitoring
General DNS record monitoring beyond DMARC.
Self hostable
Option to host the DMARC reporting solution on your own infrastructure.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free version or trial period.
Offers a free trial period.
Offers a free trial period.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Both Palisade and Fraudmarc are competent DMARC reporting tools, but each has areas where we've noted potential drawbacks. Palisade, while powerful, can be overwhelming for users new to DMARC due to its extensive feature set and interface complexity. Fraudmarc, conversely, while user-friendly, might lack the depth and advanced features that larger organizations or MSPs require for comprehensive email security management.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
0 / 5(0)
0 / 5(0)
Pricing
Palisade and Fraudmarc both offer DMARC reporting services, but their pricing models are not publicly disclosed, requiring direct contact for quotes.