Suped

Palisade vs DMARC Director

Choose Palisade for robust features, DMARC Director for a straightforward experience.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade offers a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting and enforcement tools. It provides detailed DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, giving us granular insights into email authentication results across all sending sources. This includes a clear breakdown of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC compliance.
Beyond core DMARC, Palisade integrates advanced features like SPF flattening to overcome the 10-DNS lookup limit, hosted DMARC for simplified policy management, and BIMI support to enhance brand presence. We found its multi-tenancy capabilities particularly useful for managing multiple client domains efficiently.
DMARC Director focuses on delivering essential DMARC monitoring and reporting. It processes DMARC aggregate reports, offering a clear overview of email traffic and authentication statuses. The interface is designed to help users quickly identify non-compliant senders and understand DMARC policy enforcement.
While DMARC Director covers the fundamental aspects of DMARC, it appears to be a more streamlined tool compared to Palisade. It concentrates on providing actionable data for DMARC implementation and maintenance without venturing into a broad array of auxiliary email security features. This can be beneficial for those who prefer a less cluttered environment.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Navigating Palisade reveals a robust and feature-rich interface. While it offers extensive customization and detailed reporting, we noticed a steeper learning curve for new users. The sheer volume of data and options might be overwhelming initially, requiring a bit of time to master.
Once accustomed, the dashboard provides powerful filtering and visualization tools, allowing us to drill down into specific data points with precision. Its complexity, however, means that users looking for a quick setup might find themselves spending extra time understanding its functionalities.
DMARC Director provides a more straightforward and intuitive user experience. Its interface is cleaner, with less clutter, making it easier for us to get started and understand the basics of DMARC reporting. The dashboards present key information concisely, which is excellent for quick daily checks.
We appreciate that the focus is clearly on core DMARC data, without extraneous features complicating the view. While it may not offer the same depth of customization as Palisade, its ease of use makes it a strong contender for those who prioritize simplicity and efficiency in their DMARC management.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade offers dedicated support, typically through email and a ticketing system. For complex DMARC deployments or troubleshooting, having access to their expertise is valuable. We found their documentation to be comprehensive, covering a wide range of features and common issues.
However, due to the advanced nature of the platform, some queries might require more in-depth technical assistance. Response times are generally good, but for immediate concerns, we sometimes wished for more real-time support options like live chat.
DMARC Director primarily offers support via phone and email. They emphasize direct communication, which can be reassuring when dealing with critical email deliverability issues. We appreciate having a direct line for assistance, which can be more personal than a ticketing system.
Their support appears to be geared towards guiding users through the core functionalities and initial setup. While the direct contact is a plus, the extent of technical depth and availability for complex, edge-case scenarios might vary compared to more enterprise-focused solutions.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade is highly suitable for enterprise-level organizations with complex email infrastructures and a need for advanced DMARC management. Its extensive features, including SPF flattening and multi-tenancy, make it an excellent choice for large businesses and those requiring granular control and reporting.
MSPs would also find Palisade's multi-tenancy and robust reporting capabilities beneficial for managing numerous client domains from a single platform. For SMBs, the feature set might be overkill, but those with specific, advanced requirements could still benefit from its comprehensive offerings.
DMARC Director is well-suited for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and organizations that need a straightforward, effective DMARC solution without unnecessary complexities. Its user-friendly interface makes DMARC implementation and monitoring accessible, even for those with limited technical expertise.
For enterprise clients, DMARC Director might be considered if their DMARC needs are relatively simple and they prioritize ease of use over an exhaustive feature list. MSPs might find it useful for clients with less complex DMARC requirements, though its multi-tenancy features may not be as developed as Palisade's.

How does Palisade compare with DMARC Director?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Palisade's primary drawback for us was its initial complexity, which could be a barrier for smaller teams or individuals seeking a quick DMARC setup. The extensive feature set, while powerful, also means a longer learning curve.DMARC Director, while user-friendly, has a more limited feature set compared to Palisade. Organizations with very advanced DMARC or email security needs might find it lacking in some areas, particularly advanced forensic reporting or auxiliary security protocols.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Both Palisade and DMARC Director require direct contact for pricing information, making it difficult to compare costs transparently without engaging with their sales teams.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Palisade or DMARC Director?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions