Suped

OnDMARC vs Netcraft Fraud Detection

Choose OnDMARC for DMARC management, choose Netcraft Fraud Detection for broader threat intelligence.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC provides a comprehensive suite of DMARC-focused features. We found its "Dynamic Services" to be a standout, offering easy management for DMARC, SPF, DKIM, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI. The "Investigate" tool is also quite useful for instant deliverability diagnostics.
For larger organizations, the platform extends with forensic reporting, API access, and smart alerts. We particularly appreciate the Dynamic SPF feature, which helps overcome the common 10-lookup limit, making complex SPF records manageable without manual intervention.
Netcraft Fraud Detection offers DMARC monitoring as part of its broader mandate to combat online fraud. While it provides essential DMARC reporting and analysis, its core strength lies in its extensive fraud detection capabilities, going beyond mere email authentication.
The platform excels at identifying and mitigating various forms of online fraud, including phishing, brand impersonation, and other cyberattacks. We observed that its DMARC features are integrated into a larger security framework, which can be beneficial for organizations seeking an all-encompassing fraud solution.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC generally offers an intuitive and user-friendly dashboard. We found the guided workflows particularly helpful for setting up DMARC records and progressing towards enforcement. The visual reporting makes it relatively easy to spot misconfigured senders or potential threats.
However, some users, including ourselves, have noted that the GUI can occasionally feel a bit clunky or overwhelming due to the sheer volume of data, particularly when initially navigating the forensic reports or looking for specific customization options. There is a learning curve, but it is manageable.
Netcraft Fraud Detection, while robust in its capabilities, presents a user experience that prioritizes functionality over simplistic aesthetics. We found the interface to be functional, providing the necessary data for fraud detection and DMARC monitoring.
Given its broad security focus, the dashboard can appear complex, especially for users primarily focused on DMARC. It requires a solid understanding of email security and fraud concepts to fully leverage its features. New users may need more time to become proficient with the platform.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC boasts a highly responsive and knowledgeable support team. Our experience, and that of many users, indicates that their email support is excellent, and higher tiers (Premier) include chat and phone support, along with dedicated account managers.
They offer annual or quarterly account reviews, and consistently assist with setup, configuration, and troubleshooting. While their web chat may sometimes have delays on lower tiers, overall, the support is a significant strength, guiding users through complex DMARC implementations with expertise.
Netcraft's support is typically geared towards its enterprise clientele, offering expert assistance for its comprehensive fraud detection services. While specific DMARC-focused support channels aren't as explicitly highlighted as OnDMARC's, we anticipate a professional level of technical support given their extensive security expertise.
For intricate fraud cases or deeper integration challenges, their team is well-equipped. However, for everyday DMARC questions, the directness and accessibility might vary compared to a specialized DMARC provider. Pricing tiers likely influence the level of dedicated support received.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC is highly suitable for organizations of all sizes, from SMBs to large enterprises, that prioritize comprehensive DMARC implementation and email authentication. Its tiered pricing and feature set accommodate various needs, making it an excellent choice for businesses primarily focused on achieving DMARC enforcement.
For MSPs managing multiple client domains, OnDMARC's multi-domain management and user permissioning features (in higher tiers) are beneficial. It's particularly strong for those who need active guidance through their DMARC journey and require advanced SPF flattening or BIMI support.
Netcraft Fraud Detection is best suited for enterprises or organizations with significant exposure to various online threats beyond just email spoofing. If your primary concern is an integrated approach to cybercrime, including phishing, malware, and broader brand protection, Netcraft's offering is more aligned.
While it provides DMARC functionality, it's part of a larger security ecosystem. SMBs might find it overly comprehensive or complex if DMARC is their sole focus. For MSPs, it could be a powerful tool to offer advanced fraud protection services to their clients, complementing basic DMARC needs.

How does OnDMARC compare with Netcraft Fraud Detection?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

OnDMARC's primary drawbacks revolve around its user interface occasionally feeling clunky or overwhelming, especially with forensic reports. Some users also desire more customization options for reporting dashboards and better integration with third-party mail providers. Netcraft Fraud Detection, while robust, lacks transparent pricing, which can be a barrier for potential users. Its broad fraud detection focus might also mean its DMARC features are less specialized than a dedicated tool.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Great for Managing Multiple DMAC Traces, Needs Auto-Triage for Forensic Reports
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? Managing multiple DMARC traces has become much simpler. By enabling BIMI, we were able to significantly reduce our key risks with both customers and partners. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? There is a need for automatic triaging of forensic reports, along with notifications if any anomalies are detected. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? BIMI helps our customers and partners recognize phishing scams more easily.
Verified User in Retail
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Dynamic SPF and Powerful Features, GUI Could Use Improvement
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? I have been using Red Sift OnDMARC for over three years for monitoring DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across multiple domains, which would be difficult to manage without such a tool. It offers the ease of dynamic SPF and dynamic DMARC, which simplify complex monitoring tasks. The software provides a powerful set of features, making any initial setup challenges worthwhile. I especially value the single pane of glass interface as an IT administrator managing domains that engineers use, allowing me to track domain usage, detect spam issues, and dynamically update DMARC, DKIM, and SPF with ease. The dynamic SPF and DMARC/DKIM reports are integral for my operations, as they save considerable time by turning potentially lengthy tasks into several-minute jobs. Furthermore, the friendliness and support from our account manager, alongside our quarterly meetings, enhance the overall experience and decision to continue using the platform. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? I find the GUI a little bit difficult to navigate sometimes and a bit clunky, which sometimes makes it hard to find what I want. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? I use the product to monitor DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across domains, simplifying updates and detecting spam issues with ease. It turns lengthy tasks into minutes, providing a comprehensive view of domain usage and security.
Brice P.
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC implementation with great visibility
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? OnDMARC makes it very easy to set up and maintain DMARC records. The guided workflows and clear reporting helped us move from monitoring to full enforcement confidently. The user interface is intuitive, and support is very responsive whenever we have questions. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? It would be helpful if some of the reporting dashboards allowed more customization or export options. Sometimes, the volume of daily reports can feel overwhelming without filtering. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? It is helping us prevent domain spoofing and phishing attacks by enforcing DMARC policies. It has also improved visibility into who is sending emails on behalf of our domain, so we can take quick action if needed. Overall, it has strengthened our email security posture and improved trust in our communications.
Shashi K.
SR Manager IT Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
It is quite a useful tool to manage SPF/DKIM/DMARC records and understand it's impact on the domain.
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? The ease of using the application and the UI that is provides that helps in managing the records of the domain. Plus the customer service for the tool is quite responsive. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? The limitation of the feature of MTA-STS, in which it reports only a few of the domains. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? It helps us in getting a clearer picture of the use case of our domain, plus the acceptance and the rejection rate.
Ashman B.
CyberSecurity Analyst Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC setup
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? We have had OnDMARC for several years, we onboarded all of our managed domains over the past 12months. It was very easy adding SPF, DKIM records and moving DMARC to 100% Reject. We had support from Red Sift all the way. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? Sometimes the dashboard is misleading, i had moved a domain to reject 50% and the dashboard didn't reflect that. but customer support fixed that very quickly What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? Securing our domains to bring them up to 100% Reject
Verified User in Law Practice
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

Pricing

OnDMARC offers clear, tiered pricing starting with an Express plan for smaller needs, whereas Netcraft Fraud Detection requires direct contact for all pricing inquiries.
Logo
Logo
Small
$9/month (billed annually)
Contact for pricing
Medium
$9/month (billed annually)
Contact for pricing
Large
$9/month (billed annually)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with OnDMARC or Netcraft Fraud Detection?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    OnDMARC vs Netcraft Fraud Detection DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped