MyDMARC vs.
Docker DMARC Reports in 2026
MyDMARC
Docker DMARC Reports
vs.
We tested MyDMARC and Docker DMARC Reports for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. MyDMARC gave us faster hosted onboarding and clearer report views, while Docker DMARC Reports worked for operators who want a free self-hosted parser and accept manual ownership of classification, policy movement, alerts, and support.
Published 4 Nov 2025
Updated 31 May 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
MyDMARC
Hosted DMARC reporting for small teams
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
SMBs that want hosted DMARC visibility without running infrastructure
In one line
MyDMARC handled the three-domain setup quickly and made Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp traffic easier to review.
Docker DMARC Reports
Free self-hosted DMARC reporting
Starts at
Free self-hosted
Best fit
Technical operators who prefer container control over managed guidance
In one line
Docker DMARC Reports parsed aggregate reports reliably after IMAP and database setup; Suped's product is worth checking when guided fixes, sending source identification, and published starter pricing are required.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Pick by ownership model, not dashboard taste
Pick MyDMARC if
Best for small teams that want hosted DMARC reports and light setup help
Three domains were live fastest because DNS instructions were plain and hosted setup was already there.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace grouped cleanly enough for a domain owner to act.
The unknown sender needed manual classification notes before we trusted policy movement.
Free plan available
Pick Docker DMARC Reports if
Best for technical operators who want free self-hosted aggregate report parsing
IMAP collection and MariaDB storage worked after container, mailbox, and environment setup.
Forwarded mail with SPF failure was visible, but the explanation depended on our own notes.
The parked domain stayed cheap to monitor, with infrastructure and patching owned by us.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Suped's product fits teams that want guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Guided fixes matter when Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and marketing senders have different owners.
Automated issue detection should flag spoofing, unknown sources, and domain mismatch cases without daily review.
Published starter pricing helps teams compare DMARC rollout cost before sales calls.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
MyDMARC
Docker DMARC Reports
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report parsing, domain views, and authentication outcomes.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Source detection
Turning report data into recognizable sending services.
Partial service labels
Manual workflow
Supported
Forward detection
Explaining SPF failure caused by mail forwarding.
Partial
Manual workflow
Supported
Spoof detection
Identifying unauthorized mail that fails DMARC.
Supported
Reporting only
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Operational notices for authentication changes and failures.
Basic alerts
Not included
Supported
Reporting
Exports, report views, and recurring review material.
Supported
Web viewer
Supported
API
Programmatic access for automations and integrations.
Not publicly listed
Not included
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Client separation, domain grouping, and account handoff.
Limited
Manual workflow
Supported
SPF flattening
Managing SPF lookup limits through a flattened record.
Not publicly listed
Not included
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Hosted policy records and managed DMARC DNS changes.
Not publicly listed
Not included
Supported
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF records for changing sender lists.
Not publicly listed
Not included
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted MTA-STS policy and TLS reporting support.
Not publicly listed
Not included
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist or blacklist monitoring tied to sender reputation.
Not publicly listed
Not included
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Automatic flags for authentication breaks and suspicious changes.
Basic alerts
Manual workflow
Supported
AI copilot
Assisted interpretation and next-step recommendations.
Not publicly listed
Not included
Supported
DNS monitoring
Ongoing DNS checks after initial setup.
Setup checks only
Not included
Supported
Self hostable
Ability to run the product on your own infrastructure.
Hosted product
Supported
Not self-hostable
Free trial/free tier
A no-cost way to start testing.
Free tier
Free self-hosted
Free tier
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against the same editorial rubric after the 90-day setup. Higher is better in every row, including operational categories such as alert routing, pricing clarity, and time to a defensible enforcement plan.
MyDMARC scored higher on hosted DMARC work, while Docker DMARC Reports scored higher on cost and control.
MyDMARC reduced setup time, showed the unauthorized spoof sample clearly, and made report review easier for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp. It lost points where source classification, forwarding explanations, hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, and blocklist (blacklist) monitoring were absent or thin. Docker DMARC Reports had a clear $0 self-hosted model and strong operator control, but it scored 0 where the product did not include managed support, alerts, hosted DNS workflows, or reputation monitoring.
MyDMARC score
47.5/100
Docker DMARC Reports score
20.5/100
MyDMARC
47.5/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
5.5
Source resolution
6.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
4.0
Alerting and integrations
4.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
6.5
Docker DMARC Reports
20.5/100
DMARC enforcement
2.0
Customer support
0.0
Source resolution
2.5
Setup and onboarding
3.5
MSP workflows
2.0
Alerting and integrations
0.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
2.5
Feature set
Parser depth vs operating breadth
MyDMARC covers more hosted DMARC work. Docker DMARC Reports keeps the parser small.
MyDMARC was the more complete hosted option in our test because it connected sender views, domain status, and report drilldowns without infrastructure work. Docker DMARC Reports was useful when we wanted raw aggregate visibility under our own control, but it did not turn unknown senders into guided fixes. For buyers, the deciding criterion is whether automated issue detection and guided remediation are required, which is where Suped's product belongs in the comparison.
MyDMARC
Microsoft 365 grouped cleanly
Mailchimp subdomain easy to separate
Unknown sender needed manual labeling
Docker DMARC Reports
Self-hosted IMAP ingestion worked
Raw report fields remained visible
Forwarded SPF failure needed notes
MyDMARC ingested reports for the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain without a custom mailbox build. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared as recognizable sources, SendGrid and Mailchimp were easy to separate on the marketing subdomain, and the visible From mismatch case surfaced as a DMARC problem we could hand to the domain owner. The unknown sender still needed a manual label before the account history made sense.
Docker DMARC Reports gave us IMAP collection, parsing, and a web view once the container, database, and mailbox variables were correct. It showed Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp traffic through aggregate report fields, but service naming and ownership mapping stayed with us. The forwarded mail SPF failure was visible in failures, yet the product did not explain the forwarding path or suggest policy next steps.
User experience
Guided setup vs operator setup
MyDMARC is easier for domain owners. Docker DMARC Reports is easier for container owners.
MyDMARC's hosted flow made the three-domain start cleaner, especially when we added the parked domain and marketing subdomain. Docker DMARC Reports had fewer product steps, but more infrastructure steps before any DMARC view was usable. The tradeoff is plain: MyDMARC reduced setup friction, while Docker DMARC Reports kept control in our hands.
MyDMARC
Three domains onboarded quickly
Unknown sender was findable
Forwarding explanation was partial
Docker DMARC Reports
Container setup was explicit
Unknown sender required IP review
Forwarding needed operator notes
MyDMARC made onboarding the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain a sequence of DNS checks and report destination updates. The unknown sender was findable through drilldowns, but classification still needed someone who knew the support desk sender and marketing stack. For the forwarded mail with SPF failure, the UI showed the failure pattern clearly enough for an internal note, but it did not fully explain why forwarding changed the SPF result.
Docker DMARC Reports felt direct once it was running: reports arrived by IMAP, the parser filled the database, and the web view showed aggregate results. Before that, we had to create the mailbox, configure environment variables, expose the viewer safely, and decide retention ourselves. Finding the unknown sender meant comparing IPs and report organization names manually, and the forwarded SPF failure needed our own explanation for non-technical stakeholders.
Support
Hosted help vs self managed
MyDMARC gives a support path. Docker DMARC Reports leaves support with the operator.
MyDMARC had the clearer support expectation because the hosted product had plan-based email support and a known escalation path on paid tiers. Docker DMARC Reports had no managed vendor support in our test, so DNS handoff, mailbox failures, parser errors, and enterprise onboarding belonged to our team. That difference matters more as domain count and sender count grow.
MyDMARC
DNS handoff was simple
Priority support on Pro
Enterprise path was unclear
Docker DMARC Reports
No managed support layer
Container logs drove escalation
Enterprise onboarding was internal
MyDMARC gave us enough setup help to pass DNS tasks to an administrator without writing a separate runbook. On Free and Basic-style use, we treated support as email-based and limited; on the Pro-style tier, priority support was published, which made escalation easier to plan. Enterprise onboarding was not public enough to score highly, especially for SSO, dedicated account management, or formal rollout help.
Docker DMARC Reports required us to own the whole support path. When the parser did not collect a report, our debugging list was IMAP credentials, mailbox folders, container logs, database connectivity, and scheduler timing. DNS handoff also stayed outside the product, and enterprise onboarding meant building access control, backup, patching, monitoring, and incident response around the container.
Suitability
SMB fit vs operator fit
MyDMARC fits hosted SMB reporting. Docker DMARC Reports fits self-hosted operators.
MyDMARC was the better fit for a small team that wants hosted DMARC reporting across a few domains and simple exports. Docker DMARC Reports fit teams that already run containers and want full control over storage, access, and retention. For buyers comparing options, MSP workflow depth and alert quality should be explicit criteria; Suped's product is relevant when client handoff, grouped ownership, and low-noise alerts are required.
MyDMARC
SMB workspace felt natural
MSP grouping was limited
Enterprise detail was thin
Docker DMARC Reports
Operator control was strong
Client handoff was manual
Recurring reports needed process
MyDMARC handled the three-domain account as one practical workspace, which worked for an SMB with a primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain. Account separation and recurring reporting were usable for internal handoff, but we would not treat it as a full MSP console without stronger client grouping, notes, and role separation. For enterprise use, the missing public detail around onboarding, access controls, and advanced reporting left too many procurement questions.
Docker DMARC Reports was best when we treated it as an internal operator tool. We could group domains by deployment choices and database views, but client separation, recurring client reports, and handoff notes were not product workflows. An MSP can wrap process around it, but that means owning the portal, access model, backups, and explanation layer for every client.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
MyDMARC
Hosted DMARC reporting for small teams with clear sender ownership
After 90 days, MyDMARC felt like a practical hosted DMARC workspace for a small team. The primary domain and marketing subdomain had enough history to review Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp patterns without keeping our own parser alive.
The weak point was decision support after the reports were visible. The unauthorized spoof sample was easy to spot, but the unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure still needed manual notes before we were comfortable moving policy on the corporate domain.
Where it wins
Fastest three-domain onboarding
Readable hosted report drilldowns
Public Free, Basic, and Pro tiers
Good separation for marketing senders
Where it lags
Unknown sender classification stayed manual
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
No blocklist (blacklist) monitoring found
Enterprise pricing was not public
Pricing
Free, then $19 / month
Free tier
Yes, 1 domain
Onboarding
Fast hosted setup
G2 rating
0 / 5
Docker DMARC Reports
Free self-hosted reporting for teams that own infrastructure
After 90 days, Docker DMARC Reports felt useful when we wanted a free parser under our control. Once IMAP, MariaDB, scheduling, and the web viewer were working, the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain produced enough aggregate data for manual review.
The work moved outside the product. Sender names, owner mapping, forwarded SPF explanations, alert routing, access control, retention, backups, and policy recommendations all depended on our process, so the tool stayed closer to a reporting component than a managed DMARC workflow.
Where it wins
No vendor subscription cost
Self-hosted data control
Hourly report collection worked
No published domain cap
Where it lags
No managed support path
No built-in alert routing
No guided enforcement workflow
Operations cost moved in-house
Pricing
$0 self-hosted
Free tier
Yes, self-hosted
Onboarding
Slow unless container-ready
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
MyDMARC
Docker DMARC Reports
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free covers 1 monitored domain, 7 days retention, and daily parsing; email volume caps were not published.
$0
Free self-hosted use; hosting, database, mailbox, and maintenance remain your costs.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$19 / month
Basic covers up to 5 monitored domains, 30 days retention, and hourly parsing; email volume caps were not published.
$0
No vendor billing was found; capacity depends on server, database, mailbox, and staff time.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$49 / month
Pro covers up to 20 monitored domains, 90 days retention, near real-time parsing, and priority email support.
$0
No vendor cap was found, but scaling depends on infrastructure and database capacity.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No public enterprise tier above 20 domains, volume bands, SLA, or onboarding price was listed.
$0
No enterprise plan was found; enterprise use requires internal hosting, access control, backups, and operations.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
MyDMARC prices are public monthly list prices from the official pricing data available for Free, Basic, and Pro; annual totals and email-volume caps were not public. Docker DMARC Reports is listed as $0 self-hosted use, with infrastructure and staff time excluded. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Guided sender fixes
In our test, MyDMARC surfaced the unknown sender but still needed manual owner notes, while Docker DMARC Reports left service naming to us. Suped's product pairs source identification with guided fixes so Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and support desk traffic can be assigned cleanly.
Hosted records without container upkeep
Docker DMARC Reports kept subscription cost at $0, but we owned IMAP, database, access control, backups, and patching. Suped's product adds hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, and hosted MTA-STS for teams that do not want DMARC reporting tied to infrastructure chores.
Alerts that match policy risk
MyDMARC gave report visibility, and Docker DMARC Reports showed aggregate failures, but the forwarded SPF failure and spoof sample still needed our own triage rules. Suped's product focuses alerts on authentication breaks, spoofing, and source changes that affect enforcement decisions.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from MyDMARC or Docker DMARC Reports?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
