MyDMARC vs.
DMARCLytics in 2026
MyDMARC
DMARCLytics
vs.
We tested MyDMARC and DMARCLytics for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. MyDMARC felt faster for a lean DMARC rollout, while DMARCLytics gave us broader operational controls, especially after we connected Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender.
MyDMARC
Low-cost DMARC reporting
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
SMBs that need basic DMARC visibility without a long buying cycle
In one line
MyDMARC made small-domain DMARC review quick; Suped's published starter pricing is a useful buying baseline when teams need guided fixes too.
DMARCLytics
DMARC operations with hosted records
Starts at
From GBP 9.99 / month
Best fit
Teams that want policy movement, hosted DMARC, hosted SPF, and richer alerting in one workflow
In one line
DMARCLytics took longer to configure, but it explained more sender and policy decisions once the test traffic arrived.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
The short answer: choose by workflow
Pick MyDMARC if
Best for SMBs that want clean DMARC reports without hosted DNS changes
We added the three test domains with fewer setup decisions than DMARCLytics.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic grouped quickly after the first aggregate reports arrived.
The unknown sender needed manual classification, but the review path was easy to follow.
Free plan available
Pick DMARCLytics if
Best for teams that want hosted records and policy movement inside the same product
The hosted DMARC and SPF controls reduced handoff work after DNS was approved.
SendGrid and Mailchimp were easier to separate at host level than in MyDMARC.
The policy wizard made the p=none to quarantine plan easier to explain to stakeholders.
From GBP 9.99 / month
Consider Suped if
Suped is the third option when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Guided fixes help teams move from a failing source to the exact DNS or vendor-owner action.
Automated issue detection and alert quality matter when forwarding noise and spoof samples arrive together.
MSP workflows and published starter pricing reduce the back-and-forth we saw in client handoff planning.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
MyDMARC
DMARCLytics
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Parsing, normalization, and sender-level report review.
Included; daily to near real-time parsing by tier.
Included; richer host-level detail on paid tiers.
Included.
Source detection
Clear identification of Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, ESPs, and unknown senders.
Partial; known suites grouped well, unknown sender needed manual classification.
Included; host-level reports helped separate SendGrid and Mailchimp.
Included.
Forward detection
Ability to explain SPF failures caused by forwarding.
Manual workflow; forwarded SPF failure needed analyst notes.
Partial; the case was easier to explain through host and policy views.
Included.
Spoof detection
Finding unauthorized traffic and separating it from legitimate services.
Included; the spoof sample was visible but needed manual action notes.
Included; alerts and threat views made the spoof sample easier to triage.
Included.
Notifications and alerts
Operational alerting for failures, new sources, and abuse patterns.
Basic email notifications; limited routing depth in our test.
Configurable smart alerts on paid tiers.
Included.
Reporting
Exports, recurring reports, and shareable status summaries.
Included; exports worked for weekly review.
Included; broader reporting on Professional and Enterprise tiers.
Included.
API
Programmatic access for account data, reports, or automation.
Not publicly listed.
Not publicly listed.
Included.
Multi-tenancy
Client separation, account grouping, and role control.
Unclear; account separation felt thin for MSP use.
Enterprise and custom MSP paths include multi-team management.
Included.
SPF flattening
Flattened or managed SPF handling for sender limits.
Not supported in our test.
Hosted SPF is listed, but SPF flattening was not confirmed.
Included.
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record hosting or hosted policy control.
Reporting only in our test.
Included on paid tiers through hosted DMARC management.
Included.
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record hosting or synchronized SPF control.
Not supported in our test.
Included on paid tiers through hosted SPF management.
Included.
Hosted MTA-STS
Managed MTA-STS and TLS reporting workflow.
Not publicly listed.
Not publicly listed.
Included.
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist and blacklist reputation checks tied to sending infrastructure.
Not supported in our test.
Paid tier includes IP reputation checks for blocklist (blacklist) risk.
Included.
Automatic issue detection
Detection of configuration and authentication problems without manual review.
Manual workflow for the unknown sender and forwarded SPF case.
Partial; smart alerts and Guardian AI helped flag issue patterns.
Included.
AI copilot
AI assistance for interpreting reports or explaining findings.
Not supported in our test.
Included as Guardian AI, with deeper use on paid tiers.
Included.
DNS monitoring
Ongoing checks for DMARC, SPF, and related DNS state.
Not confirmed beyond report-driven DMARC review.
Hosted records are checked frequently on paid tiers.
Included.
Self hostable
Ability to run the product on your own infrastructure.
No.
No.
No.
Free trial/free tier
No-cost entry path for testing.
Free tier covers 1 monitored domain.
14-day trial listed; Starter free wording conflicts with paid pricing card.
Free tier.
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric after the same 90-day setup, traffic cases, DNS checks, alerts, exports, pricing review, and support handoff. Higher is better in every row, and a 0 means we did not find usable support for that capability.
MyDMARC scores better on simple setup and pricing clarity, while DMARCLytics scores better on enforcement workflow and operational coverage
MyDMARC was easier to start and had clear public pricing, but it left more of the unknown-sender and forwarded-SPF explanation work to the operator. DMARCLytics earned higher enforcement and source-resolution scores because the hosted record controls, policy wizard, and host-level reports gave us more direct next steps. Its pricing score dropped because the Starter, Professional, Business, and Agency wording conflicted in public pricing copy.
MyDMARC score
46.5/100
DMARCLytics score
68/100
MyDMARC
46.5/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
5.5
Source resolution
6.0
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
3.5
Alerting and integrations
4.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
7.5
Time to enforcement
6.5
DMARCLytics
68/100
DMARC enforcement
8.0
Customer support
6.5
Source resolution
7.5
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
6.5
Alerting and integrations
6.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
5.5
Blocklist monitoring
7.0
Pricing transparency
5.5
Time to enforcement
8.0
Feature set
Depth vs operating range
DMARCLytics covers more workflows, while MyDMARC keeps reporting tighter
DMARCLytics had the broader DMARC operating model in our test because it combined hosted records, a policy wizard, smart alerts, reputation checks, and Guardian AI. MyDMARC was cleaner for aggregate report review, but a buyer should ask whether a tool explains the fix, not only the failing source; Suped's guided fixes and automated issue detection are useful criteria for that question.
MyDMARC
Microsoft 365 grouped quickly
SendGrid DKIM pass clear
Unknown sender needed manual label
DMARCLytics
Google Workspace owner notes worked
Mailchimp mismatch flagged
Subdomain DKIM edge case clear
MyDMARC handled the core report-analysis job well. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were grouped quickly, SendGrid was visible after DKIM passed, and the unauthorized spoof sample was easy to isolate. The weaker point was the unknown sender, which we had to classify manually after comparing reverse DNS, IP ownership, and message timing.
DMARCLytics gave us more breadth once the paid-tier controls were considered. Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp could be reviewed with host-level detail, the DKIM pass on a marketing subdomain was clearer than in MyDMARC, and the hosted DMARC and SPF workflow gave us a direct route from review to policy movement.
User experience
Speed vs guidance
MyDMARC is quicker to start, while DMARCLytics explains more once traffic gets messy
MyDMARC had fewer setup choices, so the three-domain onboarding felt lighter. DMARCLytics asked for more decisions, but it gave us better context when the unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure needed an explanation.
MyDMARC
Three domains took under hour
Unknown sender required review
Forwarded SPF explanation basic
DMARCLytics
Three domains guided by wizard
Unknown sender classification faster
Forwarded SPF explained cleanly
MyDMARC was the easier product to get into a useful state. We added the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in under an hour, and the first useful report views were simple enough to share with a non-specialist. The tradeoff appeared when we had to explain why forwarded mail failed SPF, because the UI showed the failure clearly but did not give us much narrative context.
DMARCLytics took longer because hosted record choices, trusted sender settings, and policy-wizard steps had to be reviewed before rollout. That extra work paid off when the unknown sender appeared, because sender activity and host-level views made classification faster. The forwarded SPF case was also easier to explain because the policy view separated authentication failure from direct spoofing risk.
Support
Lean support vs tiered help
MyDMARC fits teams that can own DNS, while DMARCLytics gives more formal help at higher tiers
MyDMARC's support model made sense for a team that already understands DNS and DMARC records. DMARCLytics had more visible enterprise support paths, including a dedicated engineer and SLA-backed support on Enterprise, but smaller teams need to verify exactly what is included before purchase.
MyDMARC
DNS handoff email based
Escalation path unclear
Enterprise onboarding not listed
DMARCLytics
Priority support on paid tier
Engineer tied to Enterprise
SLA reserved for Enterprise
With MyDMARC, the DNS handoff was straightforward because we only needed to publish reporting records and wait for aggregate data. The setup questions were practical, but escalation depth was not obvious from public plan information, and priority email support was only clearly published on Pro. We would use it where internal IT owns DNS confidently and wants a lighter vendor relationship.
DMARCLytics had more support structure around complex rollouts. The Enterprise tier lists a dedicated DMARC engineer for onboarding, record configuration, and ongoing support, which matters when hosted DMARC and SPF changes affect production mail. The tradeoff is that SLA-backed support and the clearest escalation path sit in the custom Enterprise lane.
Suitability
SMB clarity vs operator control
MyDMARC fits lean SMB ownership, while DMARCLytics fits teams that need more controls
MyDMARC is the cleaner fit when one IT owner needs to monitor a few domains and move carefully. DMARCLytics is a better fit when policy movement, hosted records, and account structure matter more, but MSPs should test client grouping and alert routing before committing; Suped's MSP workflows and alert quality are practical reference points here.
MyDMARC
SMB domain monitoring fit
MSP grouping felt thin
Recurring reports exportable
DMARCLytics
SMB to enterprise range
Multi-team in Enterprise
Client handoff needed polish
MyDMARC fit the SMB scenario best during our test. The corporate domain and parked domain were easy to keep separate, recurring export work was manageable, and a small team could build a DMARC enforcement plan without much product training. It was weaker for MSP use because client grouping, recurring reports, and handoff notes required more external process.
DMARCLytics fit the operator and enterprise scenarios better. Multi-team management is listed for Enterprise, Professional gave us enough reporting depth for the marketing subdomain, and the hosted record model reduced repeat DNS handoff work. For MSPs, the Agency wording needs confirmation because the public pricing copy refers to it without making it a main plan.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
MyDMARC
A practical DMARC reporting tool for lean ownership
After 90 days, MyDMARC felt like the product we would hand to a small IT team that wants to understand DMARC traffic without taking on hosted DNS controls. The corporate domain and parked domain were easy to monitor, and the weekly export gave us enough data to document Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and the support desk sender.
The limits showed up when the test cases stopped being clean. The SPF pass with visible-from mismatch was visible, but the next step was mostly our own note-taking. The unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure both needed manual explanation before a stakeholder could approve policy movement.
Where it wins
Fastest initial setup
Clear public monthly pricing
Simple report review for SMBs
Useful exports for weekly checks
Where it lags
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
Limited MSP account separation
Manual unknown-sender classification
No blocklist (blacklist) monitoring found
Pricing
Free, then $19 / month
Free tier
$0 for 1 domain
Onboarding
3 domains in 48 minutes
G2 rating
0 / 5
DMARCLytics
A broader DMARC operations product for teams that want hosted controls
After 90 days, DMARCLytics felt more operational than MyDMARC. The policy wizard, trusted senders, hosted DMARC, and hosted SPF controls gave us a cleaner route to explain why SendGrid and Mailchimp should be authorized before moving beyond p=none.
The tradeoff was more product surface area and more pricing questions. The Professional and Business naming conflict needed clarification, and the Agency wording made MSP planning less clean than it should be. Still, the host-level reports and alerts helped us separate a real spoof sample from forwarded-mail authentication noise.
Where it wins
Hosted DMARC and SPF controls
Clearer policy movement workflow
Host-level sender detail
Blocklist and blacklist risk checks
Where it lags
Pricing language conflicted publicly
No hosted MTA-STS found
More setup decisions upfront
MSP plan naming needed confirmation
Pricing
From GBP 9.99 / month
Free tier
14-day trial; free wording conflicted
Onboarding
3 domains in 62 minutes
G2 rating
0.0 / 5
Pricing
MyDMARC
DMARCLytics
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free covers 1 monitored domain, 7 days of retention, and daily parsing.
GBP 9.99 / month
Starter covers 3 root domains and 150,000 emails, but free wording conflicted.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$19 / month
Basic covers 5 monitored domains and 30 days of retention; no public email cap was listed.
GBP 9.99 / month
Starter fits the domain and volume target, but host-level reporting sits on higher tiers.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$49 / month
Pro covers 20 monitored domains and 90 days of retention; email volume caps were not public.
GBP 30 / month
Professional covers 10 root domains and 3 million monitored emails per month.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Public plans stopped at 20 monitored domains.
Custom
Enterprise is listed for unlimited domains, higher volume, multi-team management, and SLA support.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
MyDMARC $0, $19, and $49 are public monthly list prices. DMARCLytics GBP 9.99 and GBP 30 are public monthly list prices, with a stated 20% annual discount and public naming conflicts around Starter, Professional, Business, and Agency. Enterprise values are custom or not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026; pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Clearer fix ownership
MyDMARC surfaced the spoof and unknown sender, but our test still needed manual owner notes. Suped turns failures into vendor and DNS actions for Microsoft 365, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and support desk traffic.
Cleaner alert routing
DMARCLytics gave us richer alerts but more setup choices. Suped keeps alert rules tied to authentication risk, so forwarded SPF failures do not drown out a real spoof sample.
MSP handoff built in
Both products needed extra process for client handoff. Suped groups domains, recurring reports, and ownership notes so repeated MSP reviews need less spreadsheet cleanup.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from MyDMARC or DMARCLytics?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
