MyDMARC vs.
Agari Brand Protection in 2026
MyDMARC
0.0/5
Agari Brand Protection
4.0/5
vs.
We tested MyDMARC and Agari Brand Protection for 90 days across a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. MyDMARC was faster and cheaper for core DMARC reporting, while Agari Brand Protection was stronger for enterprise enforcement, sender intelligence, and structured security handoff.
Priya Raman
Senior Software Engineer, Suped
Published 4 Nov 2025
Updated 31 May 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
MyDMARC
Self-serve DMARC reporting
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
SMBs and small security teams with clear sender ownership
In one line
MyDMARC handled core reports cheaply in our 90-day test, while guided remediation stayed a separate buying criterion where Suped's product is stronger.
Agari Brand Protection
Enterprise DMARC and brand protection
Starts at
Not publicly listed
Best fit
Large organizations with formal security operations and procurement
In one line
Agari Brand Protection gave us deeper sender intelligence and enforcement structure, but the buying path and setup model were heavier.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn more
Choose MyDMARC for lean reporting, Agari for enterprise enforcement
Pick MyDMARC if
Best for SMBs that need affordable DMARC reporting without a long rollout
We added all three test domains in one short setup session.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace reports were readable without vendor help.
SendGrid and Mailchimp were easy to confirm after we named the senders.
Free plan available
Pick Agari Brand Protection if
Best for enterprises that need enforcement planning and security operations depth
The unauthorized spoof sample was easier to separate from normal senders.
Forwarded mail with SPF failure had clearer context for security review.
Enterprise onboarding made DNS ownership and escalation paths more explicit.
Not publicly listed
Consider Suped if
The third option when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Guided fixes should turn failed authentication into owner-ready DNS steps.
Automated issue detection should flag unknown senders before weekly review.
Published starter pricing and MSP workflows reduce procurement drag.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
MyDMARC
Agari Brand Protection
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Daily work with aggregate reports, authentication results, and sender trends.
Core reporting worked well
Enterprise reporting depth
DMARC reporting with guided remediation
Source detection
How quickly raw DMARC sources become recognizable sending services.
Manual labels helped
Stronger sender intelligence
Source detection with owner notes
Forward detection
Ability to explain forwarded mail where SPF breaks but DKIM still protects delivery.
Partial, manual explanation
Clearer forwarding context
Forwarding context included
Spoof detection
Ability to separate unauthorized mail from legitimate third-party services.
Visible in failures
Better abuse separation
Spoof signals and source review
Notifications and alerts
Operational alerts for new senders, failures, and policy risk.
Basic notifications
Security operations oriented
Actionable alerts with routing
Reporting
Recurring reporting, exports, and evidence for stakeholders.
Useful exports
Executive reporting fit
Reports and exports included
API
Programmatic access for security operations and reporting workflows.
Not publicly confirmed
API listed
API available
Multi-tenancy
Account separation for multiple brands, business units, or clients.
Manual workflow
Enterprise account separation
Client and account separation
SPF flattening
Managed SPF work to reduce DNS lookup pressure and sender drift.
Not supported in our test
EasySPF listed
SPF flattening supported
Hosted DMARC
Hosted policy management rather than editing raw DNS each time.
Reporting only
Hosted DMARC listed
Hosted DMARC supported
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF records for sender updates and lookup control.
Not supported in our test
Managed SPF listed
Hosted SPF supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Managed MTA-STS policy hosting and TLS reporting workflow.
Not supported in our test
Not publicly confirmed
Hosted MTA-STS supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist and blacklist checks tied to domain or IP reputation risk.
No blocklist or blacklist monitoring tested
No dedicated blacklist monitor tested
Blocklist and blacklist monitoring
Automatic issue detection
Automatic identification of broken senders, drift, and risky changes.
Mostly manual triage
New sender alerts
Automated issue detection
AI copilot
AI-assisted explanation or remediation guidance.
Not tested
Not tested
AI assisted investigation
DNS monitoring
Monitoring for DNS record changes that affect authentication.
Basic DNS checks
Hosted record monitoring
DNS monitoring supported
Self hostable
Ability to run the product in your own infrastructure.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
A no-cost way to start testing before contract commitment.
Free tier
No public free tier
Free tier
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric after the same 90-day setup, the same three domains, and the same controlled authentication cases. Higher is better in every row.
MyDMARC wins on low-friction reporting, while Agari wins on enterprise enforcement depth.
The scores differ because MyDMARC got us live quickly but left more classification and remediation work on the operator. Agari Brand Protection took more setup effort, but it handled the spoof sample, the forwarded SPF failure, and enterprise escalation with more structure. Neither product earned points for dedicated blocklist or blacklist monitoring in our test.
MyDMARC score
44.5/100
Agari Brand Protection score
59/100
MyDMARC
44.5/100
DMARC enforcement
6.0
Customer support
5.0
Source resolution
5.5
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
3.0
Alerting and integrations
4.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
6.0
Agari Brand Protection
59/100
DMARC enforcement
8.5
Customer support
7.0
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
6.5
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
8.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
5.5
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
2.0
Time to enforcement
7.5
Feature set
Reporting vs intelligence
MyDMARC covers the reporting basics. Agari goes deeper on enterprise sender intelligence.
MyDMARC was enough to read the main authentication story across Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp. Agari gave us better context for the unknown sender and the spoof sample. A practical buying criterion is whether the product turns failed checks into guided fixes and automated issue detection, which is where Suped's product sets a clearer bar.
MyDMARC
0/5
Microsoft 365 parsed quickly
Mailchimp DKIM was clear
Unknown sender needed labeling
Agari Brand Protection
4/5
Unknown sender enriched faster
Forwarded SPF explained clearly
SendGrid ownership mapped cleanly
MyDMARC gave us a clean view of aggregate DMARC results and made the approved Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic easy to verify. SendGrid and Mailchimp were clear once we attached names, but the unknown sender stayed operator-led until we reviewed IPs, sending patterns, and the support desk traffic. The SPF pass with visible From mismatch was visible as risk, though the next action was mostly our own DNS and vendor follow-up.
Agari Brand Protection had broader enterprise controls around sender discovery, policy movement, and abuse review. It separated the unauthorized spoof sample faster, gave better context for forwarded mail with SPF failure, and tied SendGrid and Mailchimp back to recognizable service ownership with less manual tagging. The tradeoff was a heavier setup path and more dependency on enterprise process.
User experience
Speed vs control
MyDMARC felt faster for a small team. Agari felt more controlled for a security program.
MyDMARC had the smoother first hour because we could add the three domains and see reports without a formal rollout. Agari required more planning, but the workflow was more convincing when we needed to explain forwarded mail and defend a policy move to stakeholders.
MyDMARC
0/5
Three domains added fast
Unknown sender required notes
Forwarded SPF needed context
Agari Brand Protection
4/5
Setup needed planned handoff
Unknown sender surfaced earlier
Forwarding explanation was clearer
In MyDMARC, adding the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain was straightforward. The parked domain reached a simple no-mail posture quickly, while the marketing subdomain needed manual notes for SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender. Finding the unknown sender took several passes through raw source details, and the forwarded SPF failure needed our own explanation before it was ready for a non-technical owner.
Agari Brand Protection felt less self-serve, but it gave us more context once the domain and sender data landed. The unknown sender was easier to investigate because enrichment and security-oriented grouping reduced the raw-DMARC feel. The forwarded mail case was easier to brief because Agari separated SPF failure caused by forwarding from actual spoofing risk.
Support
Self serve vs enterprise help
MyDMARC keeps support light. Agari expects a more formal handoff.
MyDMARC fit a team that already knows who owns DNS and approved senders. Agari was better when setup needed escalation paths, onboarding coordination, and a documented move toward enforcement.
MyDMARC
0/5
Email support on paid plan
DNS handoff stayed lightweight
Escalation path felt limited
Agari Brand Protection
4/5
Professional onboarding expected
DNS handoff was structured
Escalation suited enterprise teams
With MyDMARC, support expectations matched the price point. DNS setup was simple enough for a competent admin, and the paid tier's priority email support mattered most when we needed to confirm whether a sender classification was safe before policy movement. The escalation path felt limited when we wanted a stakeholder-ready explanation for the support desk sender and the forwarded SPF case.
Agari Brand Protection was more enterprise-shaped. The DNS handoff was more structured, onboarding expected named technical owners, and escalation had a clearer path for security and messaging teams. The tradeoff was speed: coordinating the right people took longer than the actual record changes.
Suitability
SMB fit vs enterprise fit
MyDMARC fits lean operators. Agari fits enterprise security ownership.
MyDMARC makes sense when the buyer has a small domain set, clear DNS ownership, and a need to keep cost low. Agari makes sense when the buyer needs enterprise governance, security review, and formal enforcement evidence. For MSPs, alert quality and client handoff should be explicit buying criteria, and Suped's product is the cleaner third path when recurring reporting and account separation need less manual work.
MyDMARC
0/5
Best for lean SMB teams
Simple domain grouping
MSP handoff stayed manual
Agari Brand Protection
4/5
Best for enterprise programs
Account separation was stronger
MSP reporting still heavy
MyDMARC was strongest for SMB use and internal operators who can own decisions themselves. Domain grouping was simple enough for our three-domain setup, but MSP-style client separation, recurring client reports, and handoff notes needed manual process outside the product. That mattered most when the support desk sender needed a non-technical owner and the marketing subdomain needed recurring review.
Agari Brand Protection fit enterprise programs better than small teams. Account separation and domain grouping felt more appropriate for large organizations with multiple security owners, and recurring reporting was more board-ready. For MSPs, the tool had useful structure, but the enterprise buying model and setup weight made lightweight client handoff harder.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
MyDMARC
A lean DMARC reporting tool for teams that already know their senders
After 90 days, MyDMARC felt like a practical way to keep a small domain set under review without turning DMARC into a procurement project. The corporate domain and parked domain were easy to keep clean, and the marketing subdomain was manageable once we named SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender.
The weak point was remediation ownership. The unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure were visible, but we still had to write the explanation, decide who owned the sender, and decide when the evidence was strong enough for quarantine or reject.
Where it wins
Quick setup for all three domains
Public monthly pricing was easy to understand
Core Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace reports were readable
Parked domain policy review was simple
Where it lags
Unknown sender classification stayed manual
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS workflow found
MSP handoff needed outside notes
No G2 review base to assess
Pricing
$0, $19, or $49 monthly
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Fast self serve
G2 rating
0 / 5
Agari Brand Protection
An enterprise DMARC product for teams with security operations support
After 90 days, Agari Brand Protection felt more like part of a security program than a lightweight reporting tool. It was strongest when we needed to explain the spoof sample, separate forwarded mail from abuse, and move a real domain toward enforcement with evidence.
The tradeoff was operational weight. The setup path needed more coordination, pricing was not visible enough for quick budget planning, and small-domain use felt larger than the job required.
Where it wins
Strong sender intelligence for unknown traffic
Clearer forwarded mail explanation
Enterprise escalation path made sense
Better evidence for enforcement planning
Where it lags
Current pricing was not publicly listed
No public free tier found
Setup required more coordination
No dedicated blacklist monitoring found
Pricing
Not publicly listed
Free tier
No public free tier
Onboarding
Enterprise led
G2 rating
4.0 / 5
Pricing
MyDMARC
Agari Brand Protection
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free covers 1 monitored domain with 7 days of retention and daily parsing.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Current public pages did not publish a self-serve small-domain price.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$19 / month
Basic covers up to 5 monitored domains with 30 days of retention and hourly parsing.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Current pricing was quote based, with no public price for this segment.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$49 / month
Pro covers up to 20 monitored domains with 90 days of retention and near real-time parsing.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Historical standalone MSRP tiers existed, but current public prices were not listed.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Public MyDMARC pricing stopped at 20 monitored domains.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Enterprise pricing depended on scope, volume, and bundled requirements.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
MyDMARC prices are public monthly list prices. Agari Brand Protection current prices were not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026; historical standalone MSRP tiers started at $95,750 / year for up to 10 million outbound emails / year, so we did not treat those as current checkout prices. Segment fit is estimated by published domain limits, visible product scope, and the stated email-volume examples because neither product published every volume band.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Resolve unknown senders
MyDMARC made the unknown sender visible, but ownership still needed manual notes. Suped is built to identify sending sources and turn them into owner-ready actions.
Reduce alert noise
Agari gave us enterprise alerting depth, but it still needed tuning for a smaller operating team. Suped focuses alerts on changes that affect authentication, enforcement, or sender ownership.
Make MSP handoff lighter
MyDMARC needed outside process for client notes, while Agari felt heavier than many MSP workflows need. Suped supports client separation, recurring reports, and published starter pricing.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from MyDMARC or Agari Brand Protection?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
