Suped

Mail Tower vs DMARCPal

Choose Mail Tower for advanced features, DMARCPal for simplicity and a free trial.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower provides a robust suite of features designed for comprehensive DMARC monitoring and enforcement. We found its reporting interface to be quite detailed, offering granular insights into authentication results, sending sources, and potential threats. It's clear they aim to cover all bases.
Beyond core DMARC reporting, Mail Tower includes advanced capabilities such as MTA-STS/TLS-RPT configuration, BIMI support, and extensive blocklist monitoring, allowing for a more complete email security posture. Its multi-tenancy and API access also make it suitable for managed service providers and larger organizations seeking integration.
DMARCPal focuses on simplicity and ease of use, particularly for those new to DMARC or managing fewer domains. Its primary strength lies in basic DMARC reporting, giving users a clear overview of email authentication status without overwhelming them with too much data.
While DMARCPal covers the essentials like source detection and spoof detection, we noted a lack of more advanced features present in Mail Tower, such as MTA-STS/TLS-RPT or integrated blocklist monitoring. It's a solid choice for fundamental DMARC visibility, but may require supplementing with other tools for a full security stack.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower's user interface is professional and feature-rich, providing a dashboard that offers a quick overview of DMARC compliance. We found navigation generally intuitive, though the sheer number of options and reports can take some getting used to for new users.
Its strength lies in its ability to present complex data in an organized manner, with various filtering and customization options. While effective, it might feel a bit dense for those looking for a truly minimalist experience. We appreciate the depth, but acknowledge a potential learning curve.
DMARCPal excels in user experience for those prioritizing simplicity. The interface is clean, uncluttered, and designed to provide essential DMARC information without unnecessary complexities. Setting up and getting initial reports is straightforward.
The guided setup and clear explanations make it very approachable for individuals or small teams who might not be DMARC experts. We found it quick to understand email flows and identify issues, making it a good entry point into DMARC management. However, this simplicity means less in-depth customization.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower offers standard support channels, including email and often a ticketing system. We found their responses to be thorough and technically informed, which is crucial given the complexity of DMARC. They appear capable of assisting with intricate setup or reporting questions.
For users with advanced needs or enterprise-level deployments, the quality of Mail Tower's technical assistance is a significant asset. They demonstrate a strong understanding of email deliverability and security nuances, which we found reassuring when troubleshooting issues.
DMARCPal provides accessible support, often through email and online documentation. We found their assistance helpful for basic inquiries and initial setup. The resources provided are generally clear and geared towards users who might be less familiar with DMARC intricacies.
While effective for general guidance, more complex DMARC challenges might require additional self-research or deeper technical engagement. Their support is well-suited for their target audience, offering straightforward answers to common questions.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower is exceptionally well-suited for enterprises, larger organizations, and Managed Service Providers (MSPs). Its robust feature set, including multi-tenancy, API access, and advanced security protocols like MTA-STS, caters to complex DMARC deployments and the need for scalable management across multiple clients or departments.
While an SMB could certainly use Mail Tower, its full capabilities might be more than what's needed for simpler use cases. It truly shines where comprehensive DMARC enforcement, detailed reporting, and integration into existing security frameworks are paramount.
DMARCPal is an excellent fit for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs), independent IT professionals, and individuals who need a straightforward and cost-effective solution for DMARC monitoring. Its user-friendly interface and focus on core DMARC reporting make it ideal for those who want to get started quickly without extensive technical overhead.
MSPs might find DMARCPal less feature-rich for managing a large client portfolio, particularly concerning multi-tenancy and advanced automation. Similarly, enterprises with highly complex email ecosystems might seek more granular control and integration options.

How does Mail Tower compare with DMARCPal?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Mail Tower, while powerful, might present a steeper learning curve for users less familiar with advanced email security concepts, and it lacks a free tier for initial exploration. DMARCPal, conversely, while user-friendly and offering a free trial, has a more limited feature set, potentially requiring additional tools for comprehensive protection, and its pricing is not transparent upfront.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Mail Tower offers annual, Euro-based tiered pricing without explicit figures provided, while DMARCPal details plan features but requires direct contact for pricing, though it does offer a 14-day free trial.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing (Lite plan)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing (Standard plan)
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing (Premium plan)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Mail Tower or DMARCPal?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions