Suped

KDmarc vs Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer

Choose KDmarc for a managed service, or Techsneeze for a free, self-hosted option.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc provides a comprehensive DMARC reporting and monitoring solution. Its primary strength lies in its ability to parse DMARC XML reports into easily digestible insights, helping users understand their email traffic and DMARC compliance.
We've found its dashboard to be intuitive, offering clear visualisations of DMARC authentication results, including SPF and DKIM pass/fail rates. It's designed for users who want a managed service that handles the complexities of DMARC report processing without requiring deep technical intervention.
Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is a self-hosted, open-source tool. It focuses on providing a basic yet functional way to view DMARC aggregate reports, essentially acting as a local DMARC report parser and visualiser. It requires users to set up and maintain their own server infrastructure, including a web server and database.
While it lacks advanced features like alert systems or comprehensive threat intelligence found in commercial offerings, it serves its purpose for those needing a free, on-premise solution for DMARC data analysis. Its raw nature means less abstraction, which can be a plus for highly technical users.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc aims for simplicity and ease of use. The setup process is straightforward, primarily involving creating a DMARC record that points to their service for report aggregation. Once data starts flowing, the dashboard is well-organised, presenting key metrics like email volume, DMARC compliance, and authentication failures in an accessible format.
We appreciate the visual cues and the clear breakdown of sending sources, making it easy to identify legitimate senders versus potential spoofing attempts. The learning curve is relatively gentle, making it suitable for users who prefer a 'set it and forget it' approach to DMARC monitoring.
The Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer, being a self-hosted solution, requires a more hands-on approach to user experience. The initial setup involves configuring a web server, database, and PHP environment, which demands a certain level of technical proficiency. Installing and getting the viewer running can be a project in itself.
Once operational, the interface is functional but lacks the polish and intuitive design of commercial platforms. Data is presented in tables and basic charts. For those accustomed to command-line interfaces or managing their own servers, this might be a familiar and acceptable experience, but for others, it could feel cumbersome and less user-friendly.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc offers dedicated support as part of its commercial service. While we don't have direct experience with their support channels, commercial DMARC providers typically offer email support, documentation, and sometimes live chat or phone support.
The expectation for a paid service is that you have a team to turn to for troubleshooting, configuration assistance, and general DMARC guidance. This managed approach ensures that users can resolve issues without needing extensive internal expertise.
As an open-source project, Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer's support model is community-driven. This means assistance primarily comes from forums, GitHub issues, and self-help documentation. There's no dedicated support team or service level agreement.
Users needing help must rely on the goodwill and expertise of other users or developers within the open-source community. While this can sometimes be effective, it often requires more patience and self-sufficiency, which might not be ideal for urgent or complex issues.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc is well-suited for businesses that need a robust, managed DMARC solution without the overhead of self-hosting. It's particularly good for SMBs and enterprise clients who value ease of use, comprehensive reporting, and dedicated support. MSPs could also leverage KDmarc for their clients, benefiting from its clear dashboards and reduced management burden.
Organizations that are less technically inclined or prefer a hands-off approach to DMARC implementation and monitoring will find KDmarc a suitable choice. It abstracts much of the complexity, allowing teams to focus on their core business rather than DMARC mechanics.
Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is ideal for individual developers, small technical teams, or organizations with a strong preference for open-source software and self-hosting. It fits well within a tight budget where the cost of a commercial solution is prohibitive, provided there is internal technical expertise available for setup and maintenance. It is less suitable for typical MSPs or enterprise clients.
It's a strong contender for those who want full control over their data and infrastructure, and who are comfortable with the challenges of maintaining an open-source solution. SMBs with strong IT capabilities might consider it, but it's generally not the best fit for those seeking a plug-and-play experience.

How does KDmarc compare with Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering drawbacks, KDmarc, being a commercial service, might present a cost barrier for smaller organisations or those with extremely tight budgets. Its reliance on a managed platform means less control over the underlying infrastructure compared to a self-hosted solution. For Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer, the primary drawback is the significant technical overhead for setup and maintenance, coupled with the lack of dedicated support and advanced features typically found in commercial tools. It's a DIY project.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

KDmarc operates on a subscription model, while Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is a free, open-source tool with associated self-hosting costs.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with KDmarc or Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    KDmarc vs Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped