Suped

KDmarc vs DMARC-SRG

Choose KDmarc for managed DMARC services, choose DMARC-SRG for self-hosted control.
DMARC-SRG
Compare to Suped
Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc offers a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting and enforcement features. We have found it provides robust data analysis, allowing us to delve deeply into DMARC reports to identify authentication issues, sending sources, and potential spoofing attempts.
Beyond basic reporting, KDmarc includes advanced functionalities such as detailed forensic reporting, alert systems for policy changes or suspicious activity, and guided workflows to help us move towards a DMARC enforcement policy. It is designed to offer an end-to-end solution for DMARC management.
DMARC-SRG, being an open-source PHP script, focuses primarily on parsing, viewing, and summarizing incoming DMARC reports. It serves as a foundational tool for understanding DMARC data, allowing us to generate raw and aggregated reports from our collected XML files. Its feature set is, by nature, more basic.
While DMARC-SRG provides essential insights into DMARC compliance and email sources, it lacks the sophisticated automation, advanced threat detection, and policy management capabilities found in commercial platforms. It's a solid starting point for those who prefer a hands-on approach and are comfortable with scripting.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc provides a polished, intuitive web interface that simplifies DMARC management. We found its dashboards easy to navigate, presenting complex DMARC data in digestible charts and graphs. The guided setup and policy wizards are particularly helpful for new users or those less familiar with DMARC intricacies.
The overall user journey in KDmarc is geared towards efficiency. Actions like adding domains, setting up alerts, or reviewing aggregate reports are streamlined, allowing us to focus on analysis rather than struggling with the interface. It's designed for users who expect a managed, user-friendly experience.
The user experience with DMARC-SRG is fundamentally different, reflecting its nature as a self-hosted script. It doesn't offer a traditional graphical user interface out-of-the-box; instead, it relies on command-line operations and a basic web-based viewer that we set up ourselves. This requires a level of technical comfort.
Getting DMARC-SRG up and running involves server configuration, PHP knowledge, and a good understanding of how to manage DMARC XML files. While effective for its purpose, the UX is more about functional access to data than a guided, aesthetically pleasing experience. It's a tool for engineers who enjoy tinkering.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc, as a commercial product, typically offers dedicated customer support channels. We expect to find various tiers of support, including email, chat, and potentially phone support, depending on the subscription level. This provides a clear point of contact for any issues or questions that arise.
The support team is usually well-versed in DMARC best practices and the specifics of their platform, making them valuable resources for troubleshooting and strategic guidance. For users who prioritize direct assistance and expert advice, KDmarc's structured support is a significant advantage.
DMARC-SRG, being an open-source project, relies primarily on community support. If we encounter problems or have questions, our main avenues are GitHub issues, forums, or other public community channels. This means response times can vary, and solutions often require self-reliance.
While the open-source community can be incredibly helpful and knowledgeable, it lacks the formal service level agreements (SLAs) and dedicated resources of commercial support. Users must be prepared to troubleshoot independently or rely on the collective wisdom of other users, which might not be ideal for urgent situations.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc is highly suitable for organizations of all sizes seeking a robust, managed DMARC solution without the burden of self-hosting. For MSPs, it offers multi-tenancy and streamlined management across client domains. Enterprises will appreciate its scalability, advanced features, and dedicated support for complex environments.
SMBs can also benefit from KDmarc's user-friendly interface and automation, enabling them to implement DMARC effectively even with limited in-house expertise. It's an excellent choice for any entity that values a comprehensive platform, proactive threat detection, and professional guidance.
DMARC-SRG is best suited for technically proficient individuals or small organizations with specific requirements for data control and a preference for open-source tools. For MSPs, integrating DMARC-SRG for multiple clients would require significant custom development and management overhead, making it less ideal.
Enterprises would find DMARC-SRG's feature set too basic for their complex needs, lacking the required scale, advanced analytics, and security features. SMBs, unless they have dedicated IT staff with scripting expertise, might find the self-hosting and manual management aspects challenging. It truly shines for those who want a free, customizable parser and are happy to build around it.

How does KDmarc compare with DMARC-SRG?

Logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

KDmarc offers a comprehensive, managed DMARC solution, but its main drawback might be the cost associated with its advanced features and support, which could be prohibitive for very small businesses or those with extremely tight budgets. On the other hand, DMARC-SRG is free and self-hostable, yet its primary drawbacks are the significant technical expertise required for setup and maintenance, and its limited feature set compared to commercial offerings. It truly is a DIY project.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
DMARC-SRG

Pricing

KDmarc typically operates on a subscription model with varying tiers based on email volume or features, requiring contact for specific pricing, whereas DMARC-SRG is open-source and free, though it incurs self-hosting costs.
Logo
DMARC-SRG
Small
Contact for pricing
Open-source, self-hosted (requires infrastructure)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Open-source, self-hosted (requires infrastructure)
Large
Contact for pricing
Open-source, self-hosted (requires infrastructure)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Open-source, self-hosted (requires infrastructure)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with KDmarc or DMARC-SRG?
Logo
DMARC-SRG
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    KDmarc vs DMARC-SRG DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped